EdXposed vs Lsposed

[AllanonMage]

I'm not clear on the differences between them, and it seems that there are even more alternatives.

Is one better than another?

I just got an Android 10 phone, was previously on 7 for a short time, but was otherwise still on 5 and 6.

 

[Lord Sithek]

I'm not clear on the differences between them, and it seems that there are even more alternatives.

Is one better than another?

I just got an Android 10 phone, was previously on 7 for a short time, but was otherwise still on 5 and 6.

The main difference is that in LSPosed you have to whitelist apps to be hooked instead of blacklist. The second one is that EdXposed seems to break SafetyNet in latest version. And it seems that it's not that actively developed as LSPosed

 

[Arakawa.]

They both have whitelist and on LSPosed it set in default. But only EdXposed have blacklist. I saw some comment like "have too much modules and too much apps to hook, how painful to check everything by manually".
Yes, Edxposed still break SafetyNet.
Yes, now Edxposed is not that actively update than LSPosed.

Something about LSPosed

If you can read Chinese, maybe you can read these below: https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603603/ https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603669/ https://www.zhihu.com/question/442534533 https://www.zhihu.com/question/442531709 I am very troubled by...

forum.xda-developers.com

I personally tried both. Not that much difference. Yeah, because basically LSPosed just forked Edxposed and did a little improvement.

In the end I choose Edxposed rather than LSPosed. Because I can't trust one dev who made a prank about "rm -rf" and the rest dev have no objection to this and even help him to hide it. And those personal attack with filthy language of course.

 

[cracky.ice]

They both have whitelist and on LSPosed it set in default. But only EdXposed have blacklist. I saw some comment like "have too much modules and too much apps to hook, how painful to check everything by manually".
Yes, Edxposed still break SafetyNet.
Yes, now Edxposed is not that actively update than LSPosed.

Something about LSPosed

If you can read Chinese, maybe you can read these below: https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603603/ https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv9603669/ https://www.zhihu.com/question/442534533 https://www.zhihu.com/question/442531709 I am very troubled by...

forum.xda-developers.com

I personally tried both. Not that much difference. Yeah, because basically LSPosed just forked Edxposed and did a little improvement.

In the end I choose Edxposed rather than LSPosed. Because I can't trust one dev who made a prank about "rm -rf" and the rest dev have no objection to this and even help him to hide it. And those personal attack with filthy language of course.

The developer you mentioned has left the development group long ago

 

[Michael Westen]

All I wanna know is which one passes safetytest. Installed edxposed for the first time in 2 years only to discover that safetytest is completely fubar'd. And all the tutorials I've found are old and seemingly obsolete.

 

[VD171]

This moment, LSPosed is alot better than EdXposed.
Simple that.
I say many thanks to EdXposed, but LSPosed is the future.
We Love EdXposed
We Love LSPosed
We Love Better Future

 

[VD171]

More than 100 commits less than 20 days

Commits · LSPosed/LSPosed

LSPosed Framework. Contribute to LSPosed/LSPosed development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com

 

[Md Husain]

who made a prank about "rm -rf"

Which prank? Will you share the source of the prank? Plz let us know.

Edit: Sorry, haven't noticed the quoted post, got it.

 

[mlgmxyysd]

The developer you mentioned has left the development group long ago

The man left temporarily, but what he had done was still there. And the rest of the developers don't think rm -rf is wrong. The whole development team had problems, they even excused the malicious code. Communities should not forgive this.

 

[mlgmxyysd]

LSPosed is not a good choice for Xposed: from the software itself, module scopes and Xposed Hide (White) were designed as advanced features for advanced users only, and forcing them to be enabled is abusive and will increase the learning cost for users, increase the cost for module developers, break the functionality of global modules, and make modules much less compatible. On the developer level, the LSPosed development team has been suppressing and abusing other Xposed implementations and their developers since the project's inception, attacking third-party ROM developers with web violence, and committing community divisive acts like this; one of the development team members submitted rm -rf /* malicious code to EdXposed, which was responsible for emptying CI user data. The culprit has no credibility.

 

[VD171]

The man left temporarily, but what he had done was still there. And the rest of the developers don't think rm -rf is wrong. The whole development team had problems, they even excused the malicious code. Communities should not forgive this.

We will never forgive.
But it is past.
We just need MORE attention before to accept any commit.
We will have bad people everywhere.
Nothing more.

 

[VD171]

LSPosed is not a good choice for Xposed: from the software itself, module scopes and Xposed Hide (White) were designed as advanced features for advanced users only, and forcing them to be enabled is abusive and will increase the learning cost for users, increase the cost for module developers, break the functionality of global modules, and make modules much less compatible. On the developer level, the LSPosed development team has been suppressing and abusing other Xposed implementations and their developers since the project's inception, attacking third-party ROM developers with web violence, and committing community divisive acts like this; one of the development team members submitted rm -rf /* malicious code to EdXposed, which was responsible for emptying CI user data. The culprit has no credibility.

YES.
Xposed is for ADVANCED USERS only !!!!
Xposed is not a play for kids.
I agree with you about the difficulty for developers, but well, the future is here.
And we will not accept to remain in the past.
Long Life to LSPosed
But, we love EdXposed too

 

[mlgmxyysd]

YES.
Xposed is for ADVANCED USERS only !!!!
Xposed is not a play for kids.
I agree with you about the difficulty for developers, but well, the future is here.
And we will not accept to remain in the past.
Long Life to LSPosed
But, we love EdXposed too

Put away your false future, Xposed (even ROMs) will die because of LSPosed Developers. You don't know what disgusting things LSPosed Developers are doing behind the scenes.

 

[VD171]

Put away your false future, Xposed (even ROMs) will die because of LSPosed Developers. You don't know what disgusting things LSPosed Developers are doing behind the scenes.

The point is we need xposed for Android 9, Android 10, Android 11, Android 12, Android 13, Android 14...
We currently have no choices.
Or do you have any?

 

[mlgmxyysd]

The point is we need xposed for Android 9, Android 10, Android 11, Android 12, Android 13, Android 14...
We currently have no choices.
Or do you have any?

There will be, just need to wait.

 

[VD171]

There will be, just need to wait.

I can't wait.
I have a solution, so I will use it.

 

[VD171]

But, I'm totally open for new XPOSED alternatives.
Let's keep watching

 

[jason382]

I did a test with the old original Xprivacy app. Oreo 8.1, Magisk v23, Riru v 25.4.4

With EdXposed: it works, but whole phone is slowed down. Every app is checked and Xprivacy popup asks you how to proceed (accept or deny internet/load/whatever request). It works how it should but sadly phone is slowed down and wallpaper doesn't load after phone bootup

With LSposed: it doesn't work, because: Every app just bypasses most Xprivacy functions, you only get a meaningless Binder Xprivacy popup. Xprivacy has no control over what apps do. Apps do what they want and don't ask for your permission

With Xposed Installer: it runs perfectly, flawlessly. Using the good old "Xposed Installer" with Xposed Framework version 90-beta3, the original. You know every url and request every app does, if they scan your nearby wifi, if or when they use record in cam or audio, scan your contacts, request some device identifiers, you can whitelist the urls, internet requests and loads you want. All app requests logged, apps can't do nothing without your permission. Very useful because you can use (whitelist) the functions in any app that you use and want, and dismiss the rest that's bundled within the app (ad networks, telemetry requests, proprietary functions. resource-hungry unnecessary actions). In the new XprivacyLua these features and logs and this sort of control is not possible. This is why the old original Xprivacy is superior.

 

[VD171]

I did a test with the old original Xprivacy app. Oreo 8.1, Magisk v23, Riru v 25.4.4

With EdXposed: it works, but whole phone is slowed down. Every app is checked and Xprivacy popup asks you how to proceed (accept or deny internet/load/whatever request). It works how it should but sadly phone is slowed down and wallpaper doesn't load after phone bootup

With LSposed: it doesn't work, because: Every app just bypasses most Xprivacy functions, you only get a meaningless Binder Xprivacy popup. Xprivacy has no control over what apps do. Apps do what they want and don't ask for your permission

With Xposed Installer: it runs perfectly, flawlessly. Using the good old "Xposed Installer" with Xposed Framework version 90-beta3, the original. You know every url and request every app does, if they scan your nearby wifi, if or when they use record in cam or audio, scan your contacts, request some device identifiers, you can whitelist the urls, internet requests and loads you want. All app requests logged, apps can't do nothing without your permission. Very useful because you can use (whitelist) the functions in any app that you use and want, and dismiss the rest that's bundled within the app (ad networks, telemetry requests, proprietary functions. resource-hungry unnecessary actions). In the new XprivacyLua these features and logs and this sort of control is not possible. This is why the old original Xprivacy is superior.

No. Xprivacy is NOT superior.
Xprivacy is totally deprecated and uses old methods and old functions.

XPRIVACYLUA is totally better, superior and CUSTOMIZABLE.
XprivacyLua WORKS PERFECTLY WITH LSPOSED, because I am using it on my main phone.
I LOVE XPRIVACYLUA.
I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT ROOT, XPOSED AND XPRIVACYLUA !!!!
I LOVE YOU @M66B

 

[TaZeR369]

LSPosed is the future and as of this date clearly the winner as Edxposed development has halted, it's incompatible with the latest Riru and breaks Safetynet.