Off topic I realize but, while there are many incidents of frivolous lawsuits in the U.S., Liebeck vs McDonald's should not be the poster child for them. I honestly question the reasonableness of the settlement in the suit and the percent that McDonald's was found at fault for but it was definitely a reasonable case to take to court given the evidence.Google search helped:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...-owner-sues-google-over-sporadic-3g-speed.ars
Well, if such claim was submitted in a normal jurisdictional system, he'd have his ass kicked out of the court and pay Google instead. In US, though, with McDonalds coffee case and the likes, he might even have a chance.
The T-Mo subsidized actually costs more...Gotta love the pentiles, and the fact that this moron paid all those fees rather than getting subsidized by TMobile. And the whole thing is rediculous, did anyone sue TMobile when they were selling the "TMobile 3G" when there was no 3G available on TMobile?
I hope this guy pays thousands of dollars of legal fees and the first judge throws it in the shredder.
So are you telling me that if you didn't have subsidized you wouldn't have a monthly bill from t-mobile?The T-Mo subsidized actually costs more...
If you go subsidized you have to sign a 2 year contract. If you go month by month, it's $20 less a month, which is $480 over 2 years, and then there's tax on top...
Still, it is ridiculous!
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
No?So are you telling me that if you didn't have subsidized you wouldn't have a monthly bill from t-mobile?
thats a good one.I might as well sue ferarri because my potholed streets don't allow my ferarri to exceed 150mph![]()
Thats not Ferarris fault though is it.I might as well sue ferarri because my potholed streets don't allow my ferarri to exceed 150mph![]()
And the bars represent what measure exactly? Did you compare reception values? I can bet you that there won't be lab results proving any significant reception faults in comparison with any other phone.Thats not Ferarris fault though is it.
Where as the weaker antenna on the Nexus One is Google/HTCs fault.
In places where I used to get 4 bars on my Magic, I now only get 2 or 3 on my N1.
My point is that HTC have a radio and build that can give me 4 bars of GSM and in some parts of my house 2 bars of 3G. Thats on my Magic.And the bars represent what measure exactly? Did you compare reception values? I can bet you that there won't be lab results proving any significant reception faults in comparison with any other phone.
And how exactly lack of proper 3G coverage is Google's fault? Just like the bumpy streets are Ferrari's fault? Ferrari is also marketed as "super-fast experience", the analogy is perfect.