Themes / Apps / Mods Gcam Discussion Thread

[antykat]

Antykat. AGC 8.8 with your lib is awesome for rear camera, very nice details and colors I like it a lot, but frot camera need tweaks, its oversharp.

Because the lib is optimised for main camera. You have to set corrections in libpatcher for other cameras, probably to change noise models too.

 

[godfather01020]

Because the lib is optimised for main camera. You have to set corrections in libpatcher for other cameras, probably to change noise models too.

I don't get why instead of making an less than 1mb xml you chose to make a lib and giving hassel for people(unless you're hiding something).

1."but it can be used for many xmls" this argument is garbage because if every new xml would use your lib, there would be practically no difference between any xmls.

Gcam isn't supposed to be the "everything edited color Photoshop preset " that you're making it. That is the only thing your lib does

(For the people who had to use laptappers and antykats worse config because the post was deleted, here is the updated V9 attached(daily driver)xml by intro555 for the lmc8.4r17/18)

Please read the attached screenshots for the amount of hard work and changelogs and everything(trust me you won't regret it and learn something new too )

Spoiler

 

[roirraW "edor" ehT]

Hi @godfather01020,

Would you mind please editing and putting all those images in that most recent post above into spoiler tags [SPOILER] & [/SPOILER]?

Much appreciated.

Thank you!

 

[Laptapper]

Which picture is better and why?

 

[Dayuser]

Which picture is better and why?

I like picture number 2 because it has darker shadows and it is not so bright.

 

[antykat]

I don't get why instead of making an less than 1mb xml you chose to make a lib and giving hassel for people(unless you're hiding something).

1."but it can be used for many xmls" this argument is garbage because if every new xml would use your lib, there would be practically no difference between any xmls.

Gcam isn't supposed to be the "everything edited color Photoshop preset " that you're making it. That is the only thing your lib does

(For the people who had to use laptappers and antykats worse config because the post was deleted, here is the updated V9 attached(daily driver)xml by intro555 for the lmc8.4r17/18)

Please read the attached screenshots for the amount of hard work and changelogs and everything(trust me you won't regret it and learn something new too )View attachment 5947089View attachment 5947095View attachment 5947093View attachment 5947097View attachment 5947099View attachment 5947101View attachment 5947103View attachment 5947105

Yeah, he is a great writer Let's wait for his own, created from the scratch xml (see attachment, I compared Prashant's and "his" xmls). It takes much more time than changing a few settings in somebody's xml and writing a few pages. Sometimes months from first to final version. But how can you know that?
I create libs because I want, I can and they are useful for me and other people. I've explained that to you already (see attachment). I don't understand why that bothers you so much. Most of the most popular creaters make libs. Nobody forces you to use them. So, what's the problem? You always can use copies of Prashant's xmls that you find the best.

 

[Case_]

Which picture is better and why?

Depends on the definition of "better". Both are good, depending on what you're after.

(I prefer a more natural - or more photographic, if you will - lighting in general in photos, so second one for me, even though it's a bit underexposed. People that like the more flat "HDR-ish" photos will undoubtedly prefer the first one.)

 

[roirraW "edor" ehT]

Which picture is better and why?

Interestingly, I first thought the one on the left was better because it was brighter, and I could see more detail of the chairs in the background.

But...after looking at both several more times, I like the one on the right better. I think it looks more "realistic", not artificially bright, or "too bright" like the one on the left... if that's even what's going on. It's such a fine line, and of course unless I was trying to achieve some particular effect, if there were people in the photo, I would normally prefer the brighter one.

 

[Laptapper]

I like picture number 2 because it has darker shadows and it is not so bright.

Depends on the definition of "better". Both are good, depending on what you're after.

(I prefer a more natural - or more photographic, if you will - lighting in general in photos, so second one for me, even though it's a bit underexposed. People that like the more flat "HDR-ish" photos will undoubtedly prefer the first one.)

Interestingly, I first thought the one on the left was better because it was brighter, and I could see more detail of the chairs in the background.

But...after looking at both several more times, I like the one on the right better. I think it looks more "realistic", not artificially bright, or "too bright" like the one on the left... if that's even what's going on. It's such a fine line, and of course unless I was trying to achieve some particular effect, if there were people in the photo, I would normally prefer the brighter one.

The latest configs are all nearly equal imo
It depends only on personal feelings...
Picture 1 is my latest lmc attached and picture 2 is introV9

 

[andermendz]

The latest configs are all nearly equal imo
It depends only on personal feelings...
Picture 1 is my latest lmc attached and picture 2 is introV9

how is the front camera working on introV9?

 

[antykat]

The latest configs are all nearly equal imo
It depends only on personal feelings...
Picture 1 is my latest lmc attached and picture 2 is introV9

I took a few photos with both xmls with default settings on 11T Pro. Sorry, but I must say Prashant/intro555 is much better. First of all, your xml gives very overexposed photos when there is more light. But also more noise and worse details. Photos with IMG prefix are Prashant/intro555's

 

[andermendz]

I took a few photos with both xmls with default settings on 11T Pro. Sorry, but I must say Prashant/intro555 is much better. First of all, your xml gives very overexposed photos when there is more light. But also more noise and worse details. Photos with IMG prefix are Prashant/intro555's

Trying to get selfies as preview but even if i set the config con the intro555's one, still can't if i do it with my other configs it works.

 

[godfather01020]

Update for the intro 555 config to intro555v12 :

Changelogs:
1. macro: returned softened contrast
- macro: returned color correction, with it colors are better in some conditions
- macro: made a little more saturated, brighter and more contrast
2.small tweaks in the libpatchers for consistent photos.
3. English translation to the in camera options

Announcement:

This config has been selected to be the Official config to the config section of lmc for the (Redmi note 10 pro)of the Celsoazevedo website (hub of all GCam mods): on the link to download LMC download page. So more people can easily start shooting better stock.

Intro555v12 is attached below:

 

[antykat]

Intro555 v12 vs AGC8.8 + my upcoming v3 lib. Both taken with HDR+Enhanced and 20 hdr frames.

 

[antykat]

Intro555 v12 vs AGC8.8 + my upcoming v3 lib. Both taken with HDR+Enhanced and 20 hdr frames.

 

[godfather01020]

It's okay to be salty. Everybody knows that there is nobody in the universe who makes better gcam config than you.

I request everyone to at least try his lib/xml it would seriously make his(anticats) day and he would sleep peacefully at night.

(For the moderator: this is not a insult, I'm genuinely trying to help my little friend)

 

[antykat]

It's okay to be salty. Everybody knows that there is nobody in the universe who makes better gcam config than you.

I request everyone to at least try his lib/xml it would seriously make his(anticats) day and he would sleep peacefully at night.

(For the moderator: this is not a insult, I'm genuinely trying to help my little friend)

Thank you for your kind words and caring about me
BTW, I've noticed that Intro changed Prashant's sharpness settings. Now results are worse, but still very good

 

[antykat]

@godfather01020

"I don't get why instead of making an less than 1mb xml you chose to make a lib and giving hassel for people(unless you're hiding something)."

Yes, you don't get it and I'm not surprised. Except very important reasons that I've already told you twice, there is one more the most important reason. I use hex editor for patching a lib. This way I can set values that are not in libpatcher, more precise. For exemple for Sharp mini you can set ...4.5, 5, 5.5... and nothing between. I can set every value that I want. Do you get it now? So, maybe learn little more first instead of insinuating that someone is hiding something.

 

[SupremeLeader_]

Any comparison between intro555 vs Prashant XML? Which do you recommend to use for lmc8.4?

 

[godfather01020]

<Moderator Edit>: Edited out disrespectful parts of post.

Any comparison between intro555 vs Prashant XML? Which do you recommend to use for lmc8.4?

You don't need any comparing