GCam for Poco X3

surferbyter

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2007
291
139
73
In burial v9.2 all cameras are functional. Compared to Ngcam 1.7 the settings render photos with less sharpness and detail because it is possible to install both of them, you can choose according to the type of photo you are trying to make which one to use. The front camera of the Burial is much more balanced in detail and in the color rendering of the Ngcam. Furthermore, the LDR mode is always available in the Burial. Dynamic band control that allows you to balance, even if to do this you need to know how to set it so it is advisable to do several tests to learn, very unbalanced areas of light and shadow. Example build on a strong backlight a silhouette with the subject very dark but with the background perfectly exposed. Or on the contrary, always in a strong backlight it balances subject and background. Furthermore, in some situations of night photos the LDR mode allows photos with deeper blacks and a more pronounced "night" effect. The photos attached to the post are respectively the first in LDR, the second in normal mode.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

zpower

Senior Member
Oct 21, 2007
201
48
58
So, you suggest burial instead ngcam?

That version of burial it's the last one?
Tomorrow I'll test

Any possibility to active all camaras on trCamara?
 
Last edited:

surferbyter

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2007
291
139
73
So, you suggest burial instead ngcam?

That version of burial it's the last one?
Tomorrow I'll test

Any possibility to active all camaras on trCamara?
No gcam is recommended over another. I try to give all the possibilities set at best, auxiliary cameras working, useful options activated, for example saber or stream configs7, in each gcam. Then everyone can choose one or the other according to their tastes or even keep as many as they want using them for how they work best depending on the shooting occasions. Even in the settings, if someone tries an xml finds something they don't like, for example oversharpnees can always lower the sharpness, or find the colors too bright to lower the saturation. XML is not "law" because each of us has our own visual taste. In my considerations I can tell those who want to keep a single gcam that the ngcam gives more details and less noise of all, the MJL miniqueta is the most versatile due to the interchangeable xml with a single click and the burial has more balance between the various modes shutter for those who do not like extreme details and want softer photos.

Yes burial posted is the release mod on based last original Burial beta for Percifhm34, developer for gcam on RN8P who bought the POCOX3 and tests his gcam also on our device so they are quite guaranteed. Also on the gcam that I place I can personally guarantee if there was something on them that does not work I would indicate it.

As regards the trcamera, all three auxiliary camera can be activated. I'm not testing it for now because the new version based on google camera 7.4 should come out in the next few days, so it would be a waste of time to set an xml on the old one and then start over on the new one.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

amnher

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2011
3,074
585
253
33
Taguig
No gcam is recommended over another. I try to give all the possibilities set at best, auxiliary cameras working, useful options activated, for example saber or stream configs7, in each gcam. Then everyone can choose one or the other according to their tastes or even keep as many as they want using them for how they work best depending on the shooting occasions. Even in the settings, if someone tries an xml finds something they don't like, for example oversharpnees can always lower the sharpness, or find the colors too bright to lower the saturation. XML is not "law" because each of us has our own visual taste. In my considerations I can tell those who want to keep a single gcam that the ngcam gives more details and less noise of all, the MJL miniqueta is the most versatile due to the interchangeable xml with a single click and the burial has more balance between the various modes shutter for those who do not like extreme details and want softer photos.

Yes burial posted is the release mod on based last original Burial beta for Percifhm34, developer for gcam on RN8P who bought the POCOX3 and tests his gcam also on our device so they are quite guaranteed. Also on the gcam that I place I can personally guarantee if there was something on them that does not work I would indicate it.

As regards the trcamera, all three auxiliary camera can be activated. I'm not testing it for now because the new version based on google camera 7.4 should come out in the next few days, so it would be a waste of time to set an xml on the old one and then start over on the new one.
Thank you for the work you are doing. Isa miniqueta and burial the same?ifnot you have xml for miniqueta?
 

ollie2012

Member
May 26, 2014
35
0
0

amnher

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2011
3,074
585
253
33
Taguig
In burial v9.2 all cameras are functional. Compared to Ngcam 1.7 the settings render photos with less sharpness and detail because it is possible to install both of them, you can choose according to the type of photo you are trying to make which one to use. The front camera of the Burial is much more balanced in detail and in the color rendering of the Ngcam. Furthermore, the LDR mode is always available in the Burial. Dynamic band control that allows you to balance, even if to do this you need to know how to set it so it is advisable to do several tests to learn, very unbalanced areas of light and shadow. Example build on a strong backlight a silhouette with the subject very dark but with the background perfectly exposed. Or on the contrary, always in a strong backlight it balances subject and background. Furthermore, in some situations of night photos the LDR mode allows photos with deeper blacks and a more pronounced "night" effect. The photos attached to the post are respectively the first in LDR, the second in normal mode.
I tried burial with xml you provided and flash on portrait seems bluish on white balance?
 

farsang

Member
Dec 24, 2015
9
2
23
Ok tried burial gcam port for first time. Although results are better on gcam as compared to stock but excessive processing time is disappointing. Moreover in selfie mode my face complexion shows very dark. I was last using BSG gcam mod made on redmi note 7 and processing times were way faster even in night mode and results were also good including selfie. Although i must admit that BSG worked extensively for reliable port on redmi note 7.

Is there any way to reduce no of frames in burial port?
 

surferbyter

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2007
291
139
73
Can someone repost Ngcam 1.7 POCOX3 v8².xml please. The links down.
https://mega.nz/file/XvQVSarT#F39xDiDkpCJLcsiDwZzgdb8yrxzMZlBkGO9GeqMLyz8

---------- Post added at 04:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:29 PM ----------

Ok tried burial gcam port for first time. Although results are better on gcam as compared to stock but excessive processing time is disappointing. Moreover in selfie mode my face complexion shows very dark. I was last using BSG gcam mod made on redmi note 7 and processing times were way faster even in night mode and results were also good including selfie. Although i must admit that BSG worked extensively for reliable port on redmi note 7.

Is there any way to reduce no of frames in burial port?
To lower the processing time you can reduce the number of frames in the HDR + even if at the expense of a small loss of detail. As for selfies in my opinion there is no gcam that gives good selfies ...

---------- Post added at 04:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:36 PM ----------

What are we up to now?
YOU need your own thread, man!! So you can control the OP and update the new files??
Post a link when you start one and lets keep the discussion going, thanks
Forgive me but I am Italian and I use the google translation which did not allow me to understand what you mean ...
If I understand correctly you suggest me to open my own thread where you can manage various indexes and links. I had tried but I was closed because this already existed. I know well that by doing so, that is, posting on the various gcam without index of apk xml links and information on how the various gcam work are dispersed, it creates confusion but it is not my choice.
 
Last edited:

surferbyter

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2007
291
139
73
Thank you for the work you are doing. Isa miniqueta and burial the same?ifnot you have xml for miniqueta?

To use XML in the MJL miniqueta unzip the zip and copy the entire "miniqueta" folder to the path:
/storage/emulated/0/gcam/Configs7.

The XML must be entered from the settings in the various sections found in Standard Configuration so as to have them available for change with a single click on the appropriate button at the bottom left of the interface. Do not use the classic procedure of double tap in the black space between the buttons of the interface to load XML because the miniqueta has its own main xml which includes many main settings and loading an xml from them would be skipped.

Xml:
https://mega.nz/file/LugAGJTJ#mehSuV75ZCDZCiGmcXWB7YsN2Rm3CT4G6dHgdNCJLDI

Video guide:
https://mega.nz/file/eugUELrJ#akX2Rm_5FswB43hrsVHOSV6uVy1LXXdwlul4Fsdf01c
 

zpower

Senior Member
Oct 21, 2007
201
48
58
As regards the trcamera, all three auxiliary camera can be activated. I'm not testing it for now because the new version based on google camera 7.4 should come out in the next few days, so it would be a waste of time to set an xml on the old one and then start over on the new one.
Hope you can test new version of Trcam (when released)
 

AgentCooper01

Member
Apr 26, 2015
23
1
0
Last edited:
Our Apps
Get our official app!
The best way to access XDA on your phone
Nav Gestures
Add swipe gestures to any Android
One Handed Mode
Eases uses one hand with your phone