Well that sucks...Not gonna happen
Check out @djrbliss's Tweet: https://twitter.com/djrbliss/status/497552086171533312
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Well that sucks...Not gonna happen
Check out @djrbliss's Tweet: https://twitter.com/djrbliss/status/497552086171533312
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
With the recent statement by Qualcomm on the topic...Not gonna happen
Check out @djrbliss's Tweet: https://twitter.com/djrbliss/status/497552086171533312
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
...it would seem that there's an issue of chronology that may need more attention before we take Dan Rosenberg's tweet that Samsung and LG devices have been patched to mean that we won't get a bootloader unlock.“Qualcomm Technologies takes the security of its products very seriously and invests to identify and address security vulnerabilities in our software before it’s made available to customers. We’re aware of this issue and have already made available software updates for our impacted customers to address the reported vulnerabilities.”
That's the same way I'm thinking maybe if we are patient we can see what the future will hold for us. But only time will tellWith the recent statement by Qualcomm on the topic...
...it would seem that there's an issue of chronology that may need more attention before we take Dan Rosenberg's tweet that Samsung and LG devices have been patched to mean that we won't get a bootloader unlock.
What I mean is this:
The Note 3 was listed specifically among other "affected devices" in the company of LG phones in his original paper. Dan states that only the S5 and the M8 were already patched as of the time that his paper was written. He goes on to say that the list of affected devices will surely shrink as vendors use the information to patch their devices. When his paper got more attention (posted on android blogs like droid-life and androidcentral), and he tweeted that Samsung and LG phones could not be exploited, he was perhaps saying that Samsung and LG have already utilized the information/data that Qualcomm promised to push to their customers (phone vendors) in their latest updates. So... I still have hope that those of us with early-release software on our phones will still potentially benefit from it.
Are there any holes in my logic?
The way I understand it is yes the vulnerability to inject code into the trust zone is in our phones, but our q fuses are different than that of Motorola's. For instance a retail Motorola has an unblown fuse that will say the boot loader shall be unlocked, so it's easy to inject code to blow that fuse and unlock that device. However, a retail Samsung device has an already blown fuse that says the device shall be locked if blown. You cannot inject code to unblow a fuse... I also believe the check for the blown q fuse Is done at either a lower level than trust zone or outside of trust zone altogether so we can't just inject code to always return as if it was unblown. Just my understanding of the matter. I might be a little off, but I'm fairly certain I'm close.With the recent statement by Qualcomm on the topic...
...it would seem that there's an issue of chronology that may need more attention before we take Dan Rosenberg's tweet that Samsung and LG devices have been patched to mean that we won't get a bootloader unlock.
What I mean is this:
The Note 3 was listed specifically among other "affected devices" in the company of LG phones in his original paper. Dan states that only the S5 and the M8 were already patched as of the time that his paper was written. He goes on to say that the list of affected devices will surely shrink as vendors use the information to patch their devices. When his paper got more attention (posted on android blogs like droid-life and androidcentral), and he tweeted that Samsung and LG phones could not be exploited, he was perhaps saying that Samsung and LG have already utilized the information/data that Qualcomm promised to push to their customers (phone vendors) in their latest updates. So... I still have hope that those of us with early-release software on our phones will still potentially benefit from it.
Are there any holes in my logic?
Thanks for the useful post.YES you can unlock the bootloader it's really simple go to samsung.com & go buy Verzion Note 3 Dev edition it will run $700 then you can ROM all you want
You are categorically incorrect. It's actually not very simple at all to get a developer's edition of the Note 3 for Verizon. They only release like 20 at a time, and they're always on back-order. In fact... I think I've heard rumblings that they're not releasing any more. Ever.YES you can unlock the bootloader it's really simple go to samsung.com & go buy Verzion Note 3 Dev edition it will run $700 then you can ROM all you want
what how would that be incorrect when the phone is on Samsung site you can't get the device through Verzion anyway so you make no sense but who cares you haven't placed the order for the device so what you say carries no weightYou are categorically incorrect. It's actually not very simple at all to get a developer's edition of the Note 3 for Verizon. They only release like 20 at a time, and they're always on back-order. In fact... I think I've heard rumblings that they're not releasing any more. Ever. So... again, not only was your post pretty much useless... it was based on false information. But I don't think that is much of a surprise to you or anyone that read your post.
In fact... I did place an order for the device. I was on backorder for several weeks before canceling it and buying an MI9 and using RDLV to root it. I made a conscious decision that I didn't necessarily need an unlocked bootloader to get the most of the device... mainly because the available software/roms/mods for the DE did not justify the cost, associated caveats, and waiting for the device for an indeterminate amount of time. A friend of mine did the same, and had a similar experience.what how would that be incorrect when the phone is on Samsung site you can't get the device through Verzion anyway so you make no sense but who cares you haven't placed the order for the device so what you say carries no weight
Yes towel root works fine I just got a replacement phone last week with NC4 on it and rooted using towelroot installed safestrap and running Alliance ROM with it right now. Took about 10 minutes to do everything. Hardest part was having patience to download the rom lolSeriously? And I was thinking of coming to Verizon and getting the Note 3 -_-. Does the towelroot even work for Verizons Note 3?
Awesome, thanks. If everything works out fine I should have one this Friday.Yes towel root works fine I just got a replacement phone last week with NC4 on it and rooted using towelroot installed safestrap and running Alliance ROM with it right now. Took about 10 minutes to do everything. Hardest part was having patience to download the rom lol