[INFO] Galaxy Nexus appears to be fastest smartphone available. (Benchmark Within)

-BoneZ-

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2009
515
102
43
Indiana
Posted over at DroidDog, it appears that the new Galaxy Nexus is currently the fastest phone available when it comes to the browser:




http://www.droiddog.com/android-blo...hone-4s-and-droid-razr-as-fastest-smartphone/



And while the browser benchmarks are impressive, DroidDog did go on to say:
"But while the G-NEX kicked but[sic] in the browser test it couldn’t compete with the iPhone in the graphics department."

Hopefully, we'll get to experience the quickness very soon whenever Verizon gets off their hinds and releases our phones.
 
Last edited:

hotleadsingerguy

Senior Member
Jan 12, 2010
925
173
0
might want to change the title of this thread, it is disingenuous to say the least...
I disagree. A majority of the review sites use the Browser benchmarks as the ultimate decider on how good a phone is. A phone isn't used for gaming very often...but *is* used for browsing. The browsing score is much more important to most people than the gaming scores. As long as it plays most basic games I'm fine with it...but having the browser be the quickest is very important to me.
 

oscillik

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2009
960
155
0
Widnes
I disagree. A majority of the review sites use the Browser benchmarks as the ultimate decider on how good a phone is. A phone isn't used for gaming very often...but *is* used for browsing. The browsing score is much more important to most people than the gaming scores. As long as it plays most basic games I'm fine with it...but having the browser be the quickest is very important to me.
oh okay, fair enough.

The browser is damn fast on the thing, i love it.
 

pewpewbangbang

Senior Member
Feb 13, 2010
2,046
257
0
Ann Arbor & NYC
browser improvements seem to be mostly linked to ICS as well as the TI OMAP having to do a little with it.

The Nexus S with ICS seemed to get a huge boost in browser performance.

Let's see how GSII and other devices stack up against the GN once they get ICS.

The Galnet ICS port for GSII shows it getting faster sunspider score than the Galaxy Nexus by a bit. Though this one is clocked at 1.6ghz. I'd say its an even battle.

 

-BoneZ-

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2009
515
102
43
Indiana
Would be nice if people actually link to Anandtech as thats where the original graph came from in the original post.
It would be nice if people were actually informed and read the article in the OP. Mail Online conducted the test and posted the original graph. Apology accepted. :cool:
 

appelflap

Inactive Recognized Developer
Feb 9, 2008
4,204
829
0
Utrecht
browser improvements seem to be mostly linked to ICS as well as the TI OMAP having to do a little with it.

The Nexus S with ICS seemed to get a huge boost in browser performance.

...
You're right. They've optimized the browser "dramatically" (lol) on ICS. From the Android site: http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-4.0-highlights.html

Across all types of content, the Android Browser offers dramatically improved*page rendering performancethrough updated versions of the WebKit core and the V8 Crankshaft compilation engine for JavaScript. In benchmarks run on a Nexus S device, the Android 4.0 browser showed an improvement of nearly 220% over the Android 2.3 browser in the V8 Benchmark Suite and more than 35% in the SunSpider 9.1 JavaScript Benchmark. When run on a Galaxy Nexus device, the Android 4.0 browser showed improvement of nearly 550% in the V8 benchmark and nearly 70% in the SunSpider benchmark.
 

zetsumeikuro

Senior Member
Jul 13, 2010
4,359
1,152
253
Posted over at DroidDog, it appears that the new Galaxy Nexus is currently the fastest phone available when it comes to the browser:




http://www.droiddog.com/android-blo...hone-4s-and-droid-razr-as-fastest-smartphone/



And while the browser benchmarks are impressive, DroidDog did go on to say:



Hopefully, we'll get to experience the quickness very soon whenever Verizon gets off their hinds and releases our phones.

Browser mark is flaky at best. I've played with a Bionic and gotten like 93k then 98k with a RAZR. The scores fluctuate a lot. My concern is they said the phone stutters, the display is pixelated and the audio issues. Plus Verizon is gonna bloat it down :( sad day for me.
 

voxigenboy

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2010
1,610
207
0
San Diego
browser speeds are cool(if you're into that), but who uses stock browser anyway? Its all about, how well does it multitask? Handle 720P video playback? GPS lock? Does it get hot easily like HTC phones? Will the screen bother your eyes like the RAZR?..

And Ofcourse, FPS on Angry Birds? SIRI(IRIS) issues? ;P
 

MeZmeriZe_

Senior Member
May 31, 2010
184
5
0
Perth
htmlfixit.com
I get 4000 in quadrant and the only thing in the graph on anttoto that is faster than my note is the transformer prime.

Also getting 1900 in sunspider on a big stock galaxy note. I think the note will kick even more as a when ICS is released in jan/feb.
 

DirgeExtinction

Senior Member
Sep 24, 2010
2,055
324
0
Browser mark is flaky at best. I've played with a Bionic and gotten like 93k then 98k with a RAZR. The scores fluctuate a lot. My concern is they said the phone stutters, the display is pixelated and the audio issues. Plus Verizon is gonna bloat it down :( sad day for me.
Where did you hear the display on the Nexus is pixelated? Every review I've read highly praises the display, going as far to say it's one of the best, if not the best, displays out there. And Verizon's gonna "bloat it down"? Two apps, both required by Verizon so the phone can be used on their network. If that's "bloating it down", then yeah...dunno what to say.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
 

richmelchr

Member
Oct 17, 2011
47
3
0
But while the G-NEX kicked but[sic] in the browser test it couldn’t compete with the iPhone in the graphics department.
Well no Duh! Apple took a year old phone, slapped 2 pieces of upgraded hardware and sold it as new. The sad part is that its not faster in every department. If there gonna sell a year old phone as new, they better have the stats to support it.

The funny part is a Lot of Apple customers wont admit it, but they really want a bigger screen. So Apple can do either of 2 things, make the iPhone 5 with a 4.5inch screen in which case I will love to watch all the iSheep who said that they loved having a small phone squirm. Or keep it small to save face and make the iSheep suffer with the tiny ass screen.

I love watching how frequently Apple grasps for fallacious arguments just so they don't have to admit that they were wrong. Not a Humble corporation.
 

Yumunum

Senior Member
Oct 11, 2010
93
3
0
Well no Duh! Apple took a year old phone, slapped 2 pieces of upgraded hardware and sold it as new. The sad part is that its not faster in every department. If there gonna sell a year old phone as new, they better have the stats to support it.

The funny part is a Lot of Apple customers wont admit it, but they really want a bigger screen. So Apple can do either of 2 things, make the iPhone 5 with a 4.5inch screen in which case I will love to watch all the iSheep who said that they loved having a small phone squirm. Or keep it small to save face and make the iSheep suffer with the tiny ass screen.

I love watching how frequently Apple grasps for fallacious arguments just so they don't have to admit that they were wrong. Not a Humble corporation.
What are you taking about? The 4S is a beast. It owns in the spec department. No denying that. And who says all the "iSheep" want small screens? Read more Apple forums - there are varying opinions. A big screen was one of the most wanted things for the 4S. Also, what do you mean "The sad part is that its not faster in every department."? Are you talking about whether the 4S was faster in every department than the 4? Cuz it is. EVERYTHING on the 4S is speedier than the 4, whether it's app loading, games, animations, browsing, even data speeds.

Get off your high-horse, and realize that the Nexus and iPhone 4S are basically head to head. No one is better than the other - it all depends on what you want. Both have very distinct and exclusive features that you can't replicate on the opposing handset. It comes down to what you need. Both are amazing.