[INFO] glbenchmark score

[magic_man]

They had scores on pocketnow. Based on anandtech review on adreno 220 gpu I thought it was going to blow away Tegra 2 but it was only about 7% higher.

 

[Virtue94]

At least it did better than the Tegra 2 phones. I was seriously starting to think the Snapdragon processor was going to be the weakest out of the bunch. And do you mind posting links?

 

[touness69]

Isn't it smartbench rather than glbenchmark ??
Smartbench isn't very accurate although not as flawed as quadrant, glbenchmark is the best one for now

 

[magic_man]

At least it did better than the Tegra 2 phones. I was seriously starting to think the Snapdragon processor was going to be the weakest out of the bunch. And do you mind posting links?

http://pocketnow.com/android/htc-sensation-graphics-benchmarked-compared

 

[Killbynature]

The sg2 gpu is the weakest out of all of them if you seen the test the nexus s has a weaker and gpu than that if a vibrant and the sg2 gpu is weaker than that

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

 

[Virtue94]

Search up the results for the ODroid A tablet that's using the same Exynos 4210 processor. The results blow everything away even though the tablet is running at a higher resolution. All the tests so far on the SGSII are only done on prototype firmware so it isn't fair to test it and see how it stacks up at the moment.

 

[worker1]

That's overclocked to 1.5 GHz?

 

[Spartoi]

That's overclocked to 1.5 GHz?

1.2 GHz; its from the actual Sensation device.

 

[dinan]

Wow... are you a troll? Run-on sentence with bad grammar and baseless (and completely wrong) claims, yea I probably shouldn't be feeding you.

The sg2 gpu is the weakest out of all of them if you seen the test the nexus s has a weaker and gpu than that if a vibrant and the sg2 gpu is weaker than that

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

 

[Killbynature]

Wow... are you a troll? Run-on sentence with bad grammar and baseless (and completely wrong) claims, yea I probably shouldn't be feeding you.

I'm not even trying to troll Hummingbird's PowerVR SGX540 can do 90M triangles/sec, but according to webpage for mali-400mp from Arm's website, it can only do 30M triangles/sec meaning it is weaker but most likely has better performance probably a reason why Samsung didn't go qhd super amoled on it.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

 

[dinan]

Yes, a single core Mali400 can do what the website says. You do know that the setup in the galaxy S2 is a QUAD CORE Mali right?

EDIT: Also the widely thrown around statistic of 90m triangles/sec for the SGX540 is wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerVR#Series_5

I'm not even trying to troll Hummingbird's PowerVR SGX540 can do 90M triangles/sec, but according to webpage for mali-400mp from Arm's website, it can only do 30M triangles/sec meaning it is weaker but most likely has better performance probably a reason why Samsung didn't go qhd super amoled on it.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

 

[Virtue94]

I'm not even trying to troll Hummingbird's PowerVR SGX540 can do 90M triangles/sec, but according to webpage for mali-400mp from Arm's website, it can only do 30M triangles/sec meaning it is weaker but most likely has better performance probably a reason why Samsung didn't go qhd super amoled on it.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

Feeding a troll goes against my better judgement but I can't help but say something about why Samsung didn't include a qHD SAMOLED. The new SAMOLED+ has more subpixels on it which requires more space than what a 4 inch screen can provide to get the same WVGA resolution. If Samsung were to make the resolution qHD, it would probably be way larger than the 4.3 inches it is currently, making it way too big to be a smartphone and pushing it into tablet territory. And do you even understand the costs it takes to make an OLED panel that large?!? Add that to the increased difficulty of making a large OLED panel successfully. The larger one makes the panel, the more room there is for error. Its not that Samsung doesn't want to make the screen qHD, it's because they can't. Oh and btw, the Exynos processor has plenty of power to utilize a qHD if they did manage to fit one in.

 

[dinan]

I had read somewhere that it was pretty hard for samsung to get their OLEDs to have a pixel density higher than 200ppi with a 3 subpixel layout rather than their original pentile 2 subpixel layout. At 4.27" diagonal this panel is already pushing slightly over 200ppi which I think is their theoretical production limit currently. So ya, a qHD SAMOLED Plus panel would probably need to be 4.5" at least with their current manufacturing limits. It's probably why the samsung infuse (which was their first samoled plus screen) is 4.5" and the SGS2 is 4.27" which means they're getting better, but not quite there yet.

Feeding a troll goes against my better judgement but I can't help but say something about why Samsung didn't include a qHD SAMOLED. The new SAMOLED+ has more subpixels on it which requires more space than what a 4 inch screen can provide to get the same WVGA resolution. If Samsung were to make the resolution qHD, it would probably be way larger than the 4.3 inches it is currently, making it way too big to be a smartphone and pushing it into tablet territory. And do you even understand the costs it takes to make an OLED panel that large?!? Add that to the increased difficulty of making a large OLED panel successfully. The larger one makes the panel, the more room there is for error. Its not that Samsung doesn't want to make the screen qHD, it's because they can't. Oh and btw, the Exynos processor has plenty of power to utilize a qHD if they did manage to fit one in.

 

[touness69]

I'm not even trying to troll Hummingbird's PowerVR SGX540 can do 90M triangles/sec, but according to webpage for mali-400mp from Arm's website, it can only do 30M triangles/sec meaning it is weaker but most likely has better performance probably a reason why Samsung didn't go qhd super amoled on it.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

So your a troll in fact ? ew
Exynos at 1Ghz can actually run a graphic intensive game at 60fps on a 1080p screen, it can even go up to 70fps with a proper 1.4 HDMI cable...
http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/samsungs-exynos-4210-flexes-3d-gaming-muscle-at-gdc-2011-video/
Not to mention the Exynos on the Galaxy S II is clocked at 1.2Ghz

Enough, you have eaten enough for today

 

[Killbynature]

So your a troll in fact ? ew
Exynos at 1Ghz can actually run a graphic intensive game at 60fps on a 1080p screen, it can even go up to 70fps with a proper 1.4 HDMI cable...
http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/samsungs-exynos-4210-flexes-3d-gaming-muscle-at-gdc-2011-video/
Not to mention the Exynos on the Galaxy S II is clocked at 1.2Ghz

Enough, you have eaten enough for today

I'm not trolling I was wrong I admit it. Calm down.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

 

[Maedhros]

Hm..

I still think that Tegra 2 OC will beat Snapdragon OC.

And the SGS will be king again -_-

I REALLY wish HTC would get its hardware from Samsung and NOT Qualcomm.

 

[Virtue94]

Hm..

I still think that Tegra 2 OC will beat Snapdragon OC.

And the SGS will be king again -_-

I REALLY wish HTC would get its hardware from Samsung and NOT Qualcomm.

Agreed. An HTC phone with both the Exynos and SAMOLED+ would completely destroy its competition. I guess that's why Samsung doesn't want to supply them with it...