No because there is no official stock ROM and source. All we have are leaks and Samsung hasn't released the JB kernel source yet.
Not quite right, there are two kernels already for JB. But will not mention the names here as this would be rude. But you can search yourself.
By the way - JB kernel sources (update5) have been leaked as well meanwhile. So I expect many JB kernels rather soon now...
Actually we've had the i9300 sources for 2 days now. And yes they are i9300 sources. My kernel and Siyah are built from source.No. There is no JB source for the i9300 anywhere. The source you speak of is for the Korean version just released with LTE which this device does not have. Also the JB kernels for the i9300 utilize the stock kernel itself and are not built from any Samsung JB i9300 source.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Actually we've had the i9300 sources for 2 days now. And yes they are i9300 sources. My kernel and Siyah are built from source.
Edit: Are all XDA news writers happy trigger on things?
Hi Netarchy, will u be dev'ing the JB kernel. Gotta say when I was on ICS your's is the kernel I used so I'm hoping u will develop for JB.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Yes, absolutely yes! I've been a bit busy with life. I only finally got around to tossing JB on my sgs3 within the last week ;D
That said, I'm gonna try to get something going this weekend.
Just flashed this on my I747.. now it won't power on. Any suggestions besides criticism and JTagging? I am not a noob, so please don't treat me as such.
Still waiting for CM/AOSP/AOKP support. Wish it come soon.
Is setcpu ok to use for over clocking? Some kernal devs don't recommend it for they're kernals, wanna check if it's ok for this one. Thanks.
Just want to say my piece and I shall be gone.
That's nice, however what you do or do not condone is as important to the world as what colour dump I took this morning in precise HTML values.I do not condone some of the posts in other development threads that were way too off-topic
You keep using this word. I do not think it means what you think it means., and I do understand your perspective in keeping this thread clean from all the banal talks, etc, but nevertheless one should bear in mind of the 2 points:
Thanks for the compliment, Great Britain was awesome back then.I am sure you have done a lot in the xda community, but I cannot help to feel that your attitude resembles your country during the colonial days.
When someone posts what is obviously a joke dumb question it can either be taken for what it is and promptly ignored or removed by moderators. I'm not going to respond to every "hurr this kernal not work on my HTC" post that's just trying to get themselves into Post Five and yes, it happens, a lot. It's not "One set of rules for people I know", it's one set of rules for the incredibly stupid and those rules haven't changed since the last thread.There were a few posts that was purposely created just for the sake of some humour, and I know those posts were from some distinguished developers, like yourself. Perhaps you guys have gone a long way back. However, when someone posts some other banal talks, they were immediately taken to post 5. For those who doesn't know, they will think that you are practicing elitism and double standards. One set of rules for people you know and respect, and another set for people you did not give a hoot.
Sure, you can say that you don't give a damn what others think about you, but hey remember it is a reflection of your well-being. I do hope that you do not do this to feed your own ego.
Again your completely misinformed view is here to haunt you. I've insulted no-one's family in Post Five or any other post in this thread. If you properly understood what you were being morally outraged by, you'd understand that. I will point out however, that you don't actually care about the rights and wrongs of this thread because if you did, you'd have hit the Report Post button and moved on. Instead what you are is a member of the morality brigade and like me with stupid people, you salivate with delight at the thought of giving someone a good stern talking to when they offend your moral compass. The difference? I'm good at it.The other thing I find it offending in post 5 is the type of insults you have put there. While it is still your prerogative to put what is written there, do bear in mind that you never should have brought the poster's family members in the picture. What wrong have they done to deserve this? You can insult the poster's intelligence, or rather the lack of it, you can insult their laziness for not reading and searching, but never never bring those insults into the family.
@ those who thanked Hacre in post 5
I know you guys had a good laugh when seeing those comments in post 5, but thanking Hacre for those laughter at the expense of the poster's noobness, means that you are condoning those insults, and in turn, made Hacre justified his insults. Do have some consideration and humility.
@ those who posts nonsensical comments
This is a development thread, not a helpdesk! Neither is it a wishlist! Just report the issues and bugs and attach your logcat so that it helps the developer quickly resolve the issue and improve their next builds. If you just post for the sake of quick fix, then this is definitely not the right place for you. Neither do you have the right phone.
Everyone here, please spare a thought for others. All that is needed is a little consideration for others. It will go a long way in making xda a better place for everyone.
Peace and good day!
P/S: I do not own a GSIII.
[Talking about undervolting]It may well be stupid to you but it does give a good guideline on how far we can push our devices. Considering your kernel does indeed support UV its only natural for anyone to discuss this.
Easy with the language, some may take offence
Smartest thing you've ever said on this forum bud.Ok let me clear a few things up. I apologize for calling this kernel crap, that was uncalled for, childish and very ungrateful.
When you get to a point where you realise you're a minority, here's a hint: you should stop f**king talking.I am sorry for that, you guys obviously bust your asses doing this stuff and it seems like Im the only one that did not like it.
Yeah you demonstrated this admirably with your first post. You don't have to keep reaffirming the fact that you're a simpleton.Let me point out that I do not know much about this stuff, I mean I know enough to be here, but not much beyond.
OK. I'm going to give you this one chance to cut the bullshit because this isn't even remotely close to even psychiatry 101. You're not a psychiatrist. You've misspelled schizophrenia at least once while replying to me, one would expect a psychiatrist to do better than that. Not only that an actual professional would insist upon more exposure than some posts of text on the internet, because text on the internet is largely diagnostically useless. You know why? I could be anyone talking about anything and any amount of it could be utterly made up. You cannot diagnose a mental illness over the internet based upon some text at least not without a pattern to contrast against. You do not have this so you're either a f**king idiot psych student who after five minutes of breast feeding from a psych teacher you think you know the planet, or you're really a batshit insane psych student for whom five minutes diagnosing a Twilight loving vampire embracing fat female means you know how to spot a shut in. The very fact that you're so bad at this yet decide to come and lecture ME is utterly offensive, not to me because you made it so trivial to dismiss you, but to the people who like to read good entries to post 5 and are yet let down by the fact some gutter trash like you saw fit to **** his opinion on my thread and my posts and therefore left himself open to ridicule. One can only hope your self esteem can handle this because your sadness ridden posts suggest you cannot. It truly would be a loss to...someone...no one on XDA of course, if you decided to kill yourself.I was not really speaking about post 5 to be honest, yes it is offensive but I can understand your frustration when people say dumb things. I was talking more about the grandiose introduction your British friend wrote. I see people like that every day. Typically they have advanced stages of Schizophrenia and their delusions of grandeur are somewhat justified (I am a psychiatrist).
This is just a guy with a severe God complex who mummy and daddy spoiled a little much. If you look back into their past you'll see they use nicknames like omnipotent and so on. Anyway it is still none of my business and I do apologize for being rude. Thanks for the work on behalf of the noob community.
echo "160 266 350 440" > /sys/class/misc/gpu_clock_control/gpu_control
cat /sys/class/misc/gpu_clock_control/gpu_control cat /sys/class/misc/gpu_voltage_control/gpu_control
Revision 1.2.2: - Updated to Samsung Update 4 - Freezes and Wifi dropout issues should be resolved on LG8 roms Revision 1.2.1: - Camera fix for LFB Roms Revision 1.2.0: - Updated to Samsung Update3 (LFB sources) - Version bump to reflect base update - Camera fix declared stable Revision 1.1.1-AOSP: -Implemented support for AOSP using commits from the CyanogenMod I9300 kernel. Revision 1.1.0: - A configuration option that was designed to keep more memory free resulted in a huge degradation in performance over time. It has reverted, and the minion responsible now resides at the bottom of Crystal Lake. - GPU Voltage and clock control added. - The CPU should no longer lock at 1200mhz during GPU load - No bunnies were harmed during the making of this build. Revision 1.0.2: - exfat modules not only load, but actually work! (The culprit responsible has been reduced to a pile of ash) - Undervolting floor lowered from 850mV to 600mV - run-parts support added to init.rc for ROMs that allow use of /system/etc/init.d Revision 1.0.1: - The beast responsible for exfat modules not loading has been beaten senseless with assorted blunt objects. Revision 1.0.0: - Initial release - Overclocking to 1800mhz is possible, while possibly not stable on all phones. Overclock at your own risk. - Deadline tweaked and set as default I/O scheduler. - Module exception to allow loading exfat modules - SHA1 algorithm improvements - CRC32 algorithm improvements - CPU Voltage control interface implemented - Debug overhead removed from config and assorted places in source code