no, not really much going on there. some sub-repos are even in a bit of an older state than latest QPR beta.
No issues on my end.I'm not sure if this is a kernel specific issue but recently I've been having some wifi issues, the wifi will randomly lose connection and disconnect from the network. I have an Asus RT-AX86U router which is wifi 6 and I never had this problem on the stock kernel (which I've been using since I got the phone in early December). I've only started noticing this problem since I flashed this kernel on Feb 5th (which at the time was January patch on 1.2.3, now on February patch with 1.2.4 it's still occurring). When I try to reconnect to wifi it intially refuses to (stays on Saved) but eventually it will reconnect by itself and work for some time until the next time it randomly loses connection. Not sure what's going on.
I tried restarting the router and so far it hasn't dropped the wifi connection. Firmware is up to date. I'll keep an eye on it, thanks for your replyno, not really much going on there. some sub-repos are even in a bit of an older state than latest QPR beta.
powerhal also misses the latest changes from qpr beta.
I guess they might bump the kernel later in the process.
No issues on my end.
The wifi driver is exactly stock. There´s no difference to the stock kernel.
It sounds like you´re either falling exactly into the threshold that google defines to jump from wifi to mobile data or there´s another problem.
I´d either try restarting your router, check if there wasn´t a firmware update or maybe it happens in weak signal to move the router a bit around. That made a difference on my end already. I moved mine 15cm while cleaning and this made 5ghz wifi very weak in a specific area on the far side of our living room.
I don't know that it's kernel related but I had terrible time getting my gw4 classic to connect to my P7P and to get any notifications working. I followed this thread here by @Dante63 and everything has worked great since while running Kiri kernel.Before I flashed this Kernel, I used the stock one, and it had no issues with pairing my Samsung GW 4 with my Pixel 7 pro, now with Kirisakura, my BT pairing with my GW4 is lost on every reboot, does someone know how to fix it?
yeah wireguard kernel backend is included in the kernel. Just make sure to switch to the backend in the wireguard app.I just picked up my new Pixel 7 Pro (coming over from the HTC U12+). Does this have the wireguard module as the U12 version did?
My bluetooth devices pair just fine and are also not lost on reboot. Bluetooth driver is exactly stock, but management of paired devices are not controlled by the kernel.Before I flashed this Kernel, I used the stock one, and it had no issues with pairing my Samsung GW 4 with my Pixel 7 pro, now with Kirisakura, my BT pairing with my GW4 is lost on every reboot, does someone know how to fix it?
how do I get acc to work on the P7, Feb update.This kernel + Feb rom + acc = best experience so far on my p6p. Thanks a lot! Great battery life, super smooth.
thanks, I will be keeping an eye on it. just downloaded it.if anyone missed
cause acc doesn't work properly and reliably.![]()
[MOD/magisk/root] Set charging limit to 80/85/90/95% v2
After some readings on: https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/limit-charge.4355851/ and https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/mod-magisk-root-set-charging-limit-to-90.4363477/ ( Credits to @rickysidhu_ and @foobar66 ) There is a thing I found and...forum.xda-developers.com
Use acc 2022.6.4 it works on p7p, I set mine to 80%
link pls, mine I flashed via Magisk, but when I type acc in the terminal, I get no options; it says command not found.
I think I know what you´re referring to.Hi,
i have the issue, if I'm scrolling pretty fastly in the device settings, like up und down, the touchscreen doesn't recognize it and doesn't react. So i need to scroll on more time.
I think i hadn't it before on stock kernel.
Could that be a Kernel thing?
Answer would be very appreciated.
Thanks
No, not compatible with Android 14 or QPR Beta.
if anyone missed
cause acc doesn't work properly and reliably.![]()
[MOD/magisk/root] Set charging limit to 80/85/90/95% v2
After some readings on: https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/limit-charge.4355851/ and https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/mod-magisk-root-set-charging-limit-to-90.4363477/ ( Credits to @rickysidhu_ and @foobar66 ) There is a thing I found and...forum.xda-developers.com
Please move the discussion to the proper thread. Otherwise this thread gets cluttered up completelylink pls, mine I flashed via Magisk, but when I type acc in the terminal, I get no options; it says command not found.
Yep, no issues.
"Massive" as in benchmarks. Small in non benchmark scenarios, scoped storage eats up those gains for a lot of apps too.The gains from disabling fsync are massive on every device I've owned capable of having it disabled.
Because Android keeps fsync strictly enabled for very good reasons and it´s harder to disable than on PC. Only a very small number of users actually unlock their phones, and an even smaller number play with fsync.It's my understanding that the whole data loss thing is an event that PCs are sensitive to, at least often enough to where it's been reported to the point where it's spread this far throughout the internet. I've had countless reboots unexpectedly from other issues, experiments, dead batteries etc...over the last 8 years without ever experiencing data corruption...in fact the only issues with unexpected corruption I've had have been due to Google's mutilated updates. Lol. Seriously though.
Yes, there´s the possibility of "dynamic" fsync. That means you might only lose data from when your screen was last enabled and fsync will happen when the screen is off in the best case.It's also my understanding that fsync doesn't have to always be off. If dynamic fsync is introduced, it automatically switches back on when the screen turns off. I'm not arguing or trying to persuade you to do anything that you don't feel comfortable with, but it is honestly the only reason I stopped using this kernel. If anything, I'm just giving my 2 cents in case it interests you enough to look into it a bit more. Thank you for all of your amazing work.
If you find anything interesting about the exynos roots let me know.One last thing...I installed a few Samsung specific, rather Exynos specific kernel managers after digging through the galaxy threads and they expose some more options on our devices such as MIPS Dynamic voltage min/max, and IRQ control. I'm still trying to learn more about Exynos crap because it's foreign to me, so I'm wondering if this could be advantageous.
There´s not much controversy about benchmarks for me. Benchmarks are simply tools for testing very specific scenarios.I knew benchmarks are a controversial topic but I've always liked to pull every bit of performance out of everything I've owned, whether it be a phone, car, my shlong ( couldn't resist) and I've already been able to shut those annoying **** talking Xiaomi Mi10 ultra guys up by dominating 100% of their devices on 3d mark while still not having to charge my phone for 24 hours or keep a fire nearby
Additionally to that filesystems are a lot further than 5-10 years ago, where this idea originates from.Dynamic fsync (the fsync replacement driver faux123 wrote a long time ago) is pretty much dead and causes nothing else than crashes and random reboots on modern / newer versions of the Android adapted Linux kernel.
Maybe what you mean is replacing the default fsync with asynchronous fsync instead?
*girlI remember when Samsungs were first rooted with magisk, some models needed this because the log space would fill up. On pixels not so much. The log space doesn't run out. I believe most those are also not maintained anymore because they don't need them anymore. Magisk has been updated so much since a few years ago. Unless your running on debug, you don't need to worry about logs. That is the way to actually fix your phone if you have issues. Looking at the logs. The other guy is right, don't use this module at all. Or anything like it.
If i use a log silencer magisk module, will that affect the kernel/companion in any way?![]()
as @TotallyAnxious said there´s no reason to use the module. as @dd805bb added, there´s no way to debug if there are no logs.I remember when Samsungs were first rooted with magisk, some models needed this because the log space would fill up. On pixels not so much. The log space doesn't run out. I believe most those are also not maintained anymore because they don't need them anymore. Magisk has been updated so much since a few years ago. Unless your running on debug, you don't need to worry about logs. That is the way to actually fix your phone if you have issues. Looking at the logs. The other guy is right, don't use this module at all. Or anything like it.
you need to give a lot more detail as to what you're talking about. overheating is likely related to your own personal use and background app activities. or give any details for troubleshooting