[Kernel] [2.6.38.8 (CM7)] HAVS/SVS + 1152MHz (09/17/11)

watercool

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2010
456
1
0
Froyo:

.800 was booting for me but quit every benchmark to the homescreen after a few seconds

.925 reboots constantly after a few seconds

:(

edit: hm, ok, seems to work without OC
 
Last edited:

big_adventure

Senior Member
Mar 17, 2010
658
341
0
Paris
Absolutely beautiful kernel.

I'm using the .34 BFS 800mv. It has been completely stable since loading it about 20 hours ago. Everything I have tried has worked - though I do not use Goggles often and almost never mount the SDCard as a disk. The interface as is completely smooth as ever (and noticably smoother, to me, than IR's, though that, too, was nice). Battery use overnight was nearly nothing - I charged it to 100% around 8PM, and, after a little chat, a few emails and a few SMS, I had 86% this morning at 7:15AM. That is probably the best I've EVER seen on this phone. I could not use AVS on 2.1 / CM, because it always caused frequent reboots, but that seems to be a thing of the past with .34 on FroYo. wiFi and WiFi tether both (still) work flawlessly.

I just turned 910 in Benchmark Pi (my high - faster than the 944 best I turned on Pershoots OV - and #105 on all devices).

I don't seem to turn Linpack as well - I was turning 42-43 on Pershoot's, with a high of 44.011, and I seem to see 37-38 with a high of 40.23 on this one.

Quadrant (I never used it with stock, IR's or Pershoots) just turned 1727 with SetCPU on "Ondemand".

This is with no special service stops or starts - the phone has been running since I pushed the kernel, has done browsing, calling, SMS and GTalk, played a couple of games, sat there while I both read and sync'd NewsRob, Sync to Google, Facebook and Twitter are all running, Y5 has WiFi shutdown here, 3G is connected and working, I even received a notification during (or maybe just before or after) the Quadrant test.
 

wildmonks

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2007
639
19
0
Froyo:

.800 was booting for me but quit every benchmark to the homescreen after a few seconds

.925 reboots constantly after a few seconds

:(

edit: hm, ok, seems to work without OC
Hmm.. Sorta looks like your phone doesn't respond well to overclocking. Have you tried clearing out your cache before or after you flashed? Have you tried out the Pershoot's OC kernels? If you have no problems with his kernels then I guess your phone doesn't like AVS+OC together... :(

Absolutely beautiful kernel.
I'm glad it's working out well for you :).

Yah, I too have similar results with my benchmarks with some actually lower then what others have been getting. I think irishrally had it right when he said it's not only the kernel that determine one's results.

But what probably matters more is one's user experience with their phone. And from what you described, you seem to be one happy user ;)
 

watercool

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2010
456
1
0
i don't really need OC, i am happy with 1000 mhz and this kernel should give me a better battery.

I'll try the pershoot just because i am curious if i have a bad cpu or not :(

@ to0l, may you please give me a link if you find a kernel that works with oc?

and a noob question:

with AVS the 800mV is the minimum voltage.. what is maximum and what is default for nexus one @ stock kernel?

@pershoot: http://droidbasement.com/db-blog/ one of these froyo kernels?
 
Last edited:

fitsnugly

Inactive Recognized Developer
Mar 10, 2010
2,454
2,208
0
Indianapolis, IN
OK tried out the .34 925 BFS version... SetCPU short benchmark is regularly getting high 190's, low 200's results... with pershoot's I was gettin high 240's, low 250's...

Interesting....
 
Last edited:

paratox

Senior Member
Feb 18, 2010
1,112
376
0
WTF?! i`m also blind!^^

ot:

witch wifi module is used in the .34 kernels?
i`m not able to get above 52 Mbps. doesn`t look like draft-n. sometimes it drops to 19 Mbps for no reason.

edit: forget it! after doing a wlan speed test the link speed increased to 72 Mbps. looks like the new wifi module is used.
 
Last edited:

irishrally

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,376
504
0
California
WTF?! i`m also blind!^^

ot:

witch wifi module is used in the .34 kernels?
i`m not able to get above 52 Mbps. doesn`t look like draft-n. sometimes it drops to 19 Mbps for no reason.

edit: forget it! after doing a wlan speed test the link speed increased to 72 Mbps. looks like the new wifi module is used.
You must have some sweet internet service to pull speeds like that.
 

wildmonks

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2007
639
19
0
with AVS the 800mV is the minimum voltage.. what is maximum and what is default for nexus one @ stock kernel?
The max is currently set at 1275mV for these kernels, which if I'm not mistaken is also the same for the stock kernel (just took a quick look on the official Android source site).
BTW: It looks like 1050mV is the min on the stock kernels.

just want to keep guys remembered, who "partly" initiated this kernel ^^
It was ME!!
I think I just barfed a little, Lol

witch wifi module is used in the .34 kernels?
i`m not able to get above 52 Mbps. doesn`t look like draft-n. sometimes it drops to 19 Mbps for no reason.

edit: forget it! after doing a wlan speed test the link speed increased to 72 Mbps. looks like the new wifi module is used.
Just to confirm, yah its using the updated wifi code.
 
Last edited:

chowlala

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2009
847
86
0


Wow. I must say... I'm very impressed. XD

PS EDIT: I ran the above Quadrant test on the 925v BFS.

Just wanted to ask a few newbie questions, what's the primary difference between BFS and CFS? In lay man terms please, been reading and searching and it's very technical. Lol.
 

darkjedi

Senior Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,004
556
0
Denver


Wow. I must say... I'm very impressed. XD

PS EDIT: I ran the above Quadrant test on the 925v BFS.

Just wanted to ask a few newbie questions, what's the primary difference between BFS and CFS? In lay man terms please, been reading and searching and it's very technical. Lol.
Wow, how the heck did you get that? I'm getting barely 1500 using the same kernel.