[KERNEL][20JAN]Kang-Bang Kernel Build#1 [TW-CM9-CM10-CM10.1-PA]

TheNoticer

Senior Member
Dec 21, 2012
286
37
0
Ravensburg
AW: [KERNEL][20JAN]Kang-Bang Kernel Build#1 [TW-CM9-CM10-CM10.1-PA]

WiFi isn't working or low WiFi signal?

Sent from my Desire HD using xda app-developers app
Wifi wasn't working.

EDIT: CM 10.1 (4.2.2) compatiblity? I used it there.
Thanks.

Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
 
Last edited:

Nathalex27

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2011
792
327
0
Zoetermeer
Is this kernel gonna be updated to work with new official xxlsz jb?

Just asking becouse this seems to be the only kernel except phillz that is actively being developed.

Thanks for this kernel anyway.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
 

TheNoticer

Senior Member
Dec 21, 2012
286
37
0
Ravensburg
AW: [KERNEL][20JAN]Kang-Bang Kernel Build#1 [TW-CM9-CM10-CM10.1-PA]

I am collecting money for fixing my Note..after repair I will update it.

Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
Lol?! What happened? Hardware issue or software? Signature verification failed
Stock XXLSZ recovery. Jelly bean 4.1.2

Posting questions in general section may cause male impotence. xda premium (Closed Beta)
 

mindbuster

Member
Apr 12, 2009
14
13
0
eagerly waiting fr d nxt build coz dis is d only kernel hvin added benefits like bln. Philz doesn't hv des features :D

Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
 

zroice

Senior Member
Nov 9, 2010
705
399
63
Hey guys i noticed some weird behaviour with a few custom kernels vs the "stock" one from aokp 4.1.2.

The System Load (the 3 decimals when you turn on cpu usage overlay) on stock aokp kernel at some point go down to like ~ 0.2

On Kang Bang and on Hydracore (just as an example) they stay above 2.00 all the time.

Now I read that System Load in Linux generally is a factor of how much load is waiting for your current cpu. A factor of 2.00 means that theres twice as much load as one core can handle right?

I checked ps, top etc. - there is not much cpu usage at all - system_server and android.system.ui (those two have about the same cpu % on both stock aokp 4.1.2 and kang bang or hydracore) - but why in hell is the System Load over 2 all the time?

Is this just a display error of the kernel(s)? I did get reboots with hydracore so i stopped using it - also the non-oc version was performing slower in benchmarks than the stock aokp. So now I tried the Kang Bang - after running benchmark a couple of times and wiping dalvik and fixing permissions etc I got a score of 8600 in antutu (I believe that was even with just 1400mhz enabled and 1600 disabled).

I had a reboot once and a hang - but i think thats more related to the undervolting. (voltgroup B though)

Still - I am a bit worried about the System Load - anyone have an idea what causes this? What are your system load values if you let the phone settle after a reboot?

Why is there such a vast difference (0.2 vs 2.00) on the kernels in the system load?!

Almost seems like the kernels are calculating the load differently or something..

---

ADD: By the way - is there a difference between Flashing a Kernel over an existing AOKP Rom where I already have everything set up (apps n settings n **** and just deleting dalvik and fixing permissions) vs. flashing the aokp and flashing the kernel over the fresh aokp and installing apps later? Or is a Wipe necessary AFTER flashing the kernel to make everything run smooth?

ADD2: For testing purposes (I'm trying all the kernels atm) I got my hands on the forbidden kernel and it's the only "custom" kernel that also has system_load go down to like 0.2-0.3 while all others I tried stay over 1.5 - 2.0 all the time?! Still benchmark results don't differ much at all from kangbang and forbidden.
 
Last edited: