[KERNEL][3.0.101][JB][PMEM] K^Kernel 3.0.101 v3.1 for JB 4.2.2 and JB 4.1.2 [EOL]

[Christopher83]

Version 1.4 was very laggy for me whereas previous version was very smooth. UI was not responding and phone was pretty much unusable.
I tried it for about four days.

Thank you for your feedback Milotyn,
I built various test versions of the kernel to check if there's something strange with the latest commit I made, with the jump from the 3.0.68 kernel version to 3.0.69 or with the latest commits made by Arco.
I'll let you know, I need some time to find which is the possible issue... :fingers-crossed:

 

[Christopher83]

K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.5 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2

Hi guys,
new v1.4.5 kernel released:

- Kernel 3.0.70
- Sources synched with jb-3.0 repos of Ivendor and Arco68
- Fixed performance issues
- Different builds with RAM Console support or without (seems to be more responsive)

This is mainly a minor update to solve the performance issues encountered by some of you, I'm still working on a new version with more features.

I create some kernel builds with RAM Console support (recently added by Ivendor and Arco inside the kernel sources) and without it (the ones named with NO_RC), to see if something change in terms of performance...
It seems, by my opinion, that the kernel builds without RAM Console support (NO_RC) are more responsive and performant (expecially when you're playing games).
This feature is useful expecially for development and debugging purposes, when occurs many kernel panic / unexpected shutdowns or reboots. Pratically, the kernel messages are also stored inside a little RAM portion and restored during reboot after a kernel panic, inside the file /proc/last_kmsg. So, if you never encountered such problems, you may choose the versions without RAM Console support (NO_RC).

Let me know...

Many thanks to TwinHeadedEagle and Miloytyn for their support in testing!!!

 

[busprofi]

Hi Christopher83

a little bit OT but in your Changelog on second Post you allways write the Year 2012 and i think in Italy is 2013 too


regards from Germany.....busprofi

 

[Christopher83]

Hi Christopher83

a little bit OT but in your Changelog on second Post you allways write the Year 2012 and i think in Italy is 2013 too


regards from Germany.....busprofi

Damn, I was a little tired when I created the first changelog, then I continued to repeat the wrong year...
Thank you!
Regards too. :good:

 

[ericcostes]

next update ?

hi Christopher,
do you prepare an update ... ( 070 and so on ...)
thansk for your kernel, battery drain is fantastic, the best i never seen on xda .
regards,
eric

 

[TwinHeadedEagle]

Yes, I can confirm, battery is outstanding

 

[ericcostes]

beta4 + 1.45 report

hi Christopher,

i just upadted my phone today
for me not any problem , but antutu score is smaller than previous beta3+1.35
however i could notice a very high upper performance in web navigation speed .
today i am 4 days 49 mn on battery, discharging 43% > incredible :silly::silly::silly::silly:

so nice work, thansk a lot :good:

regards,
eric

 

[XeLLaR*]

AW: [KERNEL][3.0.70][JB] K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.5 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2 [24/03/2013

I have the strange feeling that lower benchmark results mean better ui and overall speeds.

Galaxy Nexus for Example, it has lower benchmark results than our s plus, but hell, it is fast as lightning.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda-developers app

 

[Christopher83]

K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.6 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2

Hi guys,
new v1.4.6 kernel released:

- Sources synched with jb-3.0 repos of Ivendor and Arco68
- Backlight Notification v9 (BLNv9) (Thanks to CastagnaIT)
- Customizable vibration intensity (Thanks to CastagnaIT)

This is another minor update synched with the latest features added by Ivendor and CastagnaIT, a lot of thanks to them!

Inside the second post of the first page, after the changelog, you can find some useful info about some kernel features (work in progress):

Special features and sysfs settings​

Many thanks to TwinHeadedEagle, Miloytyn and Davidteri91 for their support in testing!!!

 

[educk]

Re: [KERNEL][3.0.70][JB] K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.6 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2 [26/03/2013

Inside the second post of the first page, after the changelog, you can find some useful info about some kernel features (work in progress):

Special features and sysfs settings​

Many thanks to TwinHeadedEagle, Miloytyn and Davidteri91 for their support in testing!!!

Hey, those scripts are just awesome. Great job !

 

[muhammadnajmi96]

Re: [KERNEL][3.0.70][JB] K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.6 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2 [26/03/2013

Downloading thanks

Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2

 

[west76]

I'm just flash it. It seems to good enough for me :good::good::good:

 

[cheehsiang]

Re: [KERNEL][3.0.70][JB] K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.6 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2 [26/03/2013

can we adjust vibration on 4.2.2?
thanks
Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Christopher83]

R: [KERNEL][3.0.70][JB] K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.6 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2 [26/03/2013]

can we adjust vibration on 4.2.2?
thanks
Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2

Yes, take a look at the second post inside the first page...

Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium

 

[[GR]Frostbyte]

No tun.ko support?

 

[Christopher83]

R: [KERNEL][3.0.70][JB] K^Kernel 3.0.70 v1.4.6 for JB 4.1.2 and JB 4.2.2 [26/03/2013]

No tun.ko support?

It's built inside the kernel zImage, it should work, let me know...

Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium

 

[[GR]Frostbyte]

It's built inside the kernel zImage, it should work, let me know...

Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium

OpenVPN replies that it "cannot create the tun interface, possibly the tun.ko module isn't loaded in the kernel"

 

[Christopher83]

OpenVPN replies that it "cannot create the tun interface, possibly the tun.ko module isn't loaded in the kernel"

On which rom do you have this problem?
Which is the OpenVPN app you're using?

 

[[GR]Frostbyte]

On which rom do you have this problem?
Which is the OpenVPN app you're using?

Xistance Alpha 6 / OpenVPN Connect
I think it worked fine when I had ivendor's CM10 though.. Might be something 4.2.2 related?

PS: On the bright side, I haven't seen camera glitches on Xistance's Alpha 6.

 

[Christopher83]

Xistance Alpha 6 / OpenVPN Connect
I think it worked fine when I had ivendor's CM10 though.. Might be something 4.2.2 related?

It's possibile...
Please, try to run these commands using Terminal Emulator:

su
cd /dev
ls -l tun

Post me the result...