[KERNEL][5.1.1][N910U][TW]-Suemax-kernel-v1.1-[Auto root +Busybox ][STOCK]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Search This thread

mkim055

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2012
1,146
277
Auckland
After a few days of testing U-based kernel, I can tell you that cell signal loss is there. I switched to C-based kernel you sent to my inbox, now no longer get no signal.

This is very weird
 

djmax81

Senior Member
May 9, 2010
3,311
4,186
Edmonton,Alberta
After a few days of testing U-based kernel, I can tell you that cell signal loss is there. I switched to C-based kernel you sent to my inbox, now no longer get no signal.

This is very weird


Which rom are you using ? Can you detail about your Baseband n more ? Try flasing other baseband plz.

Actually kernel is not the one which is responsible Signal . But in Your case may be your Network provider or Modem .
 

mkim055

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2012
1,146
277
Auckland
@mkim055 try change this in build.prop

ro.product.name=treltexx to ro.product.name=trphltexx

This will fix modem + Get N910U Baseband characteristics back without effecting on port of the rom . And after editing just reboot to changes.

Looks like that MAY have fixed the "no signal", will wait a couple of days to see how it goes, thank you.

It is weird how I didnt have this problem before though.
 

mkim055

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2012
1,146
277
Auckland
Clean flashed SweetROM v17 5.1.1, and got busy box stericson installed.

Still showing

"No UCI Support detected"

I managed to get past that message using Universal Kernel Manager 3.8.1, but now I am getting the following error, as shown in the screenshot.

I am so puzzled... what is going on. Anyone having similar issue?

Suemax kernel came pre-installed on SweetROM v17.
 

Attachments

  • 1446371381058.jpg
    1446371381058.jpg
    92.7 KB · Views: 215

djmax81

Senior Member
May 9, 2010
3,311
4,186
Edmonton,Alberta
Clean flashed SweetROM v17 5.1.1, and got busy box stericson installed.

Still showing

"No UCI Support detected"

I managed to get past that message using Universal Kernel Manager 3.8.1, but now I am getting the following error, as shown in the screenshot.

I am so puzzled... what is going on. Anyone having similar issue?

Suemax kernel came pre-installed on SweetROM v17.

On Sweet rom n910U its my Stock kernel = it do not support Snaypse (The only diffrence is Name )

Next time read carefully !!! Plz
 
  • Like
Reactions: not-i

deathkid13

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2015
189
80
Best kernel ever.hands down.

Those in n910c, try suemax(n910c)!!! So you'd know how awesome and best this kernel is. I've attached a photo here, proof of how i feel this is the best. At first glance, you would understand why i feel about it this way! Thanks @djmax81 :)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2015-11-02-16-34-14.png
    Screenshot_2015-11-02-16-34-14.png
    226.4 KB · Views: 233
  • Like
Reactions: djmax81
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 27
    This Stock kernel is Only for N910U 5.1.1 users.

    STOCK: Suemax-kernel-v1.1 (new)

    Change log :
    1) Auto root + Busybox
    2) init.d
    3) knox disabled from ramdisk + kernel
    4) SELUNIX : permissive
    5) Enabled CPU Gov : Conservative +Ondemand
    6) Build from new kernel dtb from scratch
    7) Made from Opensource-N910UXXU1COI2

    Requirements : 5.1.1 Bootloader + Modem + 5.1.1 firmware + Any Custom recovery

    Suemax-kernel-v1.1 : Download recovery flashable

    Suemax-kernel-v1.1 : Download Odin flashable md5

    Kernel source : Github
    6
    Guys !!! Update will there soon for N910U stock kernel users
    5
    Sir are we going to have the pleasure of your kernel in n910c variant in the future or just n910u? Thank you and welcome to the exynos party :D

    For sure.!!!! I own N910H but just tried to help N910U users coz some users were disappointed with delay of 5.1.1 update .But soon will Support N910H/N910C +N910U with my up coming Kernel thread .
    4
    Good to see you found the culprit so quickly!

    ---------- Post added at 05:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:26 PM ----------

    It is very smooth and responsive compared to C based v1.1

    No.!!! Worries actually its special Gift for my N910U Hommies :good:

    soon.!!! Will update my Custom kernel thread v1.1 :good:
    4
    Hey .!!! Guys soon will update N910U for Stock kernel Lovers :p