amit_coolcampus
Senior Member
Which sync among both are you referring to?
View attachment 5518291
Which sync among both are you referring to?
Lol...i meant data sync
but you better disable fsync too temperarily as shown above for better results
yes the kernel is fine to install but the applications are not deletedядро нормально установилось? вы можете найти его в настройках, программное обеспечение
I returned to the stock core
But at instructions post you suggest to enable both. So which one should we keep active , only dynamic?i meant data sync
but you better disable fsync too temperarily as shown above for better results
for normal daily use:But at instructions post you suggest to enable both. So which one should we keep active , only dynamic?
try uninstall 24.1, then reflash 2.17 and finish magisk 23 installation if promptedHi Everyone !
I installed Beast 2.17 and updated Magisk 23 to 24.1 and I lost Root
Thanks for advice but i completely reinstalled all system and I didn't update Magisk from 23 to 24try uninstall 24.1, then reflash 2.17 and finish magisk 23 installation if prompted
more details plsWhen I set big cluster at any value over 2002mhz it returns to 2000mhz magically , i reflash kernel and do nothing..
Smart pack kernel and Franko kernel manager do the same behaviour. I try to set big cluster up to 2ghz and goes down at 2ghz every time I tried. Reflash kernel not solve the problem.
Smart pack kernel and Franko kernel manager do the same behaviour. I try to set big cluster up to 2ghz and goes down at 2ghz every time I tried. Reflash kernel not solve the problem.
Android 10 ketan rom.
Update: the value in kernel manager gets stucked at 2ghz but the real value of cpu works well.
@ykkfive I think this should be a disclaimer in the Kernel post because there's still people who don't know.Smart pack kernel and Franko kernel manager do the same behaviour. I try to set big cluster up to 2ghz and goes down at 2ghz every time I tried. Reflash kernel not solve the problem.
Android 10 ketan rom.
Update: the value in kernel manager gets stucked at 2ghz but the real value of cpu works well.
Oh ****. I know it but stress blinds me . I thinked that tune frequency was on single core max. The strange thing is float cpu meter shows freq above 2002mhz in big cluster but appears to be the freq of 1 core x4 because is the same value always for the 4 big cores (at high freq). Actually limited big CL to 2314mhz eventually it shows 2314 in 4 big cores.@ykkfive I think this should be a disclaimer in the Kernel post because there's still people who don't know.
@turbomann
Exynos 9810 Big Cores only go to max 2886MHz when one core is used. The frequency you can tune in Smartpack Kernel Manager and Franco Kernel manager is only for Quad Core which is 2002MHz max.
Single Core load: 2886MHz (Already OCed from stock 2704MHz)
Dual Core load: 2314MHz (Same as stock. Maybe could go to 2652MHz)
Quad Core load: 2002MHz (only this you can change, stock is 1794MHz)
Running all big cores at 2886MHz will be very useful for frying eggs on your phone or making the battery go very big (2314 to 2886 power consumption doubles).
It's not a bug. It's CPU architecture. We have some releases that do 2314MHz on Quad and it's stable but heat production is bigger and the profit you get is not big enough because it throttles too fast. Needs an increased control temperature.
CPU float is actually the best out there if you want a monitor you can keep everywhere. Devcheck is an app that is able to check frequencies and offline cores much more accurately but again, it’s not on screen.Oh ****. I know it but stress blinds me . I thinked that tune frequency was on single core max. The strange thing is float cpu meter shows freq above 2002mhz in big cluster but appears to be the freq of 1 core x4 because is the same value always for the 4 big cores (at high freq). Actually limited big CL to 2314mhz eventually it shows 2314 in 4 big cores.
Anyway, cpu max freq works ok, kernel manager shows 2002mhz stucked but if you put max freq to 2600 avg, the max single core freq adjust to this freq (confirmed with the cpu float monitor). That shows that the max freq you tune applies to single core, not only quad core engage. But monitor shows the 4 cores at 2600 when the reality is one single big core at that freq.
Any float cpu meter trustable to see real core freq applied to single and dual core use?
u mean 2.04m?Now I migrated bm v2.02m + Alexis 2.8 combination. All seems decent for now. Still boeffla and double tap sections are missing. But it's okay.
Here is the devchecks ram performance attachment. (on v2.02)
I am going to perform antutu and geekbench and post here.
i have did some tests today and yes, 2.02 is the fastest one, it was the original one without any "enhancements" in other aspects like cpu/gpu overclocking. it is not unusual that these enchancements can be beaten by the one without in terms of performance. it all depends on the usage, and more importantly everthing comes with a price. so you may find it at stock max speed outperforms an overclocked cpu due to the heat generated (which trigger the mechanism to lower the cpu freq as to cool it down). eg a 10 seconds task running with 2000Mhz may be better than 3 seconds with 2400mHz plus 7 seconds with 1700Mhz. you see what i mean? of coz, once again, it depends on the usage and the way of using it like benchmarking or daily useI am on v2.05
Ram performance is decreased, confirmed with doing devcheck comparison and antutu bench.
tap to wake and sleep options are gone.
boeffla options are gone.
Accordig to Devcheck,
Cmemcopy: around 5000 Mb/s
Cmemset: aroud 7500 Mb/s
on R154 these were 10000 MB/s and 15000 Mb/s respectively.
Cpu an GPU performance are good.
I am on Alexis 2.9 Note 9 SM N960F
And also the voltage table that given by dev is passed two full antutu bench. No crashes.