[KERNEL][AOSP/TW][27 Dec] War Kernel r3 // colder than ever

[azlav]

i flashed r9 kernel over RR 5.3.1, and i can't turn of backlight completely, it still turn on while being touch even i ticked the turn off backlight...of course i already compared it before i flash the kernel...
report complete!

 

[sanioclement]

i flashed r9 kernel over RR 5.3.1, and i can't turn of backlight completely, it still turn on while being touch even i ticked the turn off backlight...of course i already compared it before i flash the kernel...
report complete!

I am also running on same setup facing the same here.

 

[cheaterdawaq]

Noticed r5 a few mins later..
any chance of the source for r5 so i can set it up so i dont have to use tegrak (hate it)

or if your bored you could do it

Been running these speeds ever since i owned it its stable at them
CPU Max Speed 1.6 ghz @ 1300mv
GPU 400 @ 1000mv
not sure what your lower speeds are
I use 160mhz @ 900mv with tegrak (only allows 2 steps)

I was also looking for a setup like that.

 

[sanioclement]

Display dimmer is my alternative to make it more dimmer

Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Free mobile app

 

[kazuna69]

@GeeckoDev, :highfive:

any thoughts of releasing new one for beta 7 ?

 

[zeu55]

@GeeckoDev, :highfive:

any thoughts of releasing new one for beta 7 ?

+1 to this

sent from my GT-N7000 Powered by Nightowl CM12 beta 7

 

[WereCatf]

@GeeckoDev, :highfive:

any thoughts of releasing new one for beta 7 ?

What's wrong with using the current one for beta 7?

 

[kazuna69]

What's wrong with using the current one for beta 7?

nothing, except different user have different taste over something,

no offence,
I didn't ask for any request/ETA's from the devs, just curious/thoughts/opinions/discussion on either the dev considering to have it for version bauner's beta 7
the stock kernel a great, nothing flaws :highfive:

 

[WereCatf]

nothing, except different user have different taste over something,

You're not answering the question, though: what do you want changed and why in your opinion there should be a new one specifically for beta 7 when even the current one works just fine with it? There is no point in creating a "new" one with no changes just for the sakes of having a new one, so certainly you must be expecting some change there.

 

[kazuna69]

You're not answering the question, though: what do you want changed and why in your opinion there should be a new one specifically for beta 7 when even the current one works just fine with it? There is no point in creating a "new" one with no changes just for the sakes of having a new one, so certainly you must be expecting some change there.

was it obvious?
I do mention

different user have different taste over something

since RAW kernel has it's own "flavour", bauner's stock has it own "taste", there's no reason "re-mentioning" whatever in the OP,

once again, no offence,
I do wonder why you kept asking the same question when the answer already stated it's definition and context,
again, people's opinions/thoughts were subjectives, it can be translated/define in many ways,
try to understand it will ya?
cheers :highfive:

 

[LAKAME_MAN]

was it obvious?
I do mention
since RAW kernel has it's own "flavour", bauner's stock has it own "taste", there's no reason "re-mentioning" whatever in the OP,

once again, no offence,
I do wonder why you kept asking the same question when the answer already stated it's definition and context,
again, people's opinions/thoughts were subjectives, it can be translated/define in many ways,
try to understand it will ya?
cheers :highfive:

I think you misunderstood his question. He was asking what's wrong with the current version of Raw kernel, not the stock kernel of BETA7, which is why your answer about "different tastes" doesn't answer his question.

 

[WereCatf]

I think you misunderstood his question. He was asking what's wrong with the current version of Raw kernel, not the stock kernel of BETA7, which is why your answer about "different tastes" doesn't answer his question.

Aye, that's exactly what I was asking. The current Raw-kernel works fine, I'm using it myself and I see no specific reason to make a new version just for beta 7. I mean, if there were some obvious bugs or such then sure, but I'm not aware of any bugs that'd prevent one from using the current Raw-kernel with beta 7.

 

[abdullahchoudhary97]

Announcing Raw Kernel r9

#JeSuisCharlie edition

Changes over r8 :
* MMC_CAP_ERASE is disabled, so we can TRIM our device for better I/O performance. The official brickbug patch is merged since at least two years, it's safe.
* -50mV GPU undervolting for group B+ devices
* Compatible with CM12 beta 4
* Added a CM11 variant (a long last!)

Download :
* raw_kernel_r9_omni.zip for Omni 4.4
* raw_kernel_r9_cm12.zip for CM12 beta 4
* raw_kernel_r9_cm11.zip for CM11

Let's talk a bit about TRIM. You should do it once on /system after flashing a ROM, /data and /cache will be trimmed by Android itself. /preload is an unused partition on AOSP, you should wipe it and trim it once and for all. To make the process a lot easier, I created this flashable zip run_fstrim.zip that will trim /system, /cache, /data and /preload from the recovery. I recommend using it just after flashing a ROM (and a TRIM-enabled kernel, of course...), or right now if you have never trimmed before.

and when to trimm...? before flashing GAPPS or after that...?

 

[firestonez]

Hi,
Can I request a raw kernel for mokee.?
Thanks

Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Free mobile app

 

[WereCatf]

and when to trimm...? before flashing GAPPS or after that...?

After you've flashed everything else you were going to flash.

 

[kazuna69]

Aye, that's exactly what I was asking. The current Raw-kernel works fine, I'm using it myself and I see no specific reason to make a new version just for beta 7. I mean, if there were some obvious bugs or such then sure, but I'm not aware of any bugs that'd prevent one from using the current Raw-kernel with beta 7.

pardon/forgive me for my mistakenly understand then :highfive:

well, I'm not sure what's kept bothering me over the old raw kernel,
I'm not sure, my experience using the beta 4 version of this raw kernel is slightly different from the other user
hanged/freeze at whatsapp :silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly::silly:
that's all, thanks for letting me know my mistakenly understand over the statements, :highfive:

honestly, I couldn't get it at beginning

 

[KTTech]

USB Fast charge support?

It is an awesome kernel, but I miss only one thing: the fast charge support. It is painfully slow to charge the battery, when not using the original AC charger with the original cable (for example in my car). It is possible to implement the fast charge support?

 

[GeeckoDev]

It is an awesome kernel, but I miss only one thing: the fast charge support. It is painfully slow to charge the battery, when not using the original AC charger with the original cable (for example in my car). It is possible to implement the fast charge support?

Yep, that's something I noticed when coming back from Raw Kernel TW.
raw/AOSP is very slow and raw/TW too fast (not very good for the battery), I will adjust that soon.

 

[KTTech]

Yep, that's something I noticed when coming back from Raw Kernel TW.
raw/AOSP is very slow and raw/TW too fast (not very good for the battery), I will adjust that soon.

Thank you 1000mA charging current would be just fine (0,4C rate, very safe, Samsung's factory default), it's not harms the battery (the temperature of the battery - if it's goes too high - and the number of charges kills the LiIon batteries, not the moderate charging current). Currently the phone easily can draw much more power from the battery than it chargres when not in the original wall charger (or not properly matched usb port).

 

[TheVic!]

Kernel Tweaker

Hello @GeeckoDev.

First I wanted to thank you for the awesome Raw kernel. Been using it for bauners excellent cm12 rom and I feel it makes my battery last a lot longer.
I have an app called kernel tweaker. This app has some options to adjust CPU and GPU parameters and UV table. But when I open GPU param and UV table, it says that this rom doesn't support it and that i need a custom kernel that supports it. Is there any chance that you can make this kernel open for adjusting? Im a noob when it comes to this, so maybe it isn't open for a reason... But just wondering....