[Kernel] RenderZenith OP6 [OOS-P-EAS-V1.5.0][10/21]

[DiGtal]

That's false. Do a better search of the thread and you will find out why.

You're right. In this particular case the ramdisk changes require root.

 

[joakimbo]

I'm just curious. Is there still development @RenderBroken? Just checked github and noticed latest commit is from 19th january.. I love this kernel btw!

 

[RenderBroken]

I'm just curious. Is there still development @RenderBroken? Just checked github and noticed latest commit is from 19th january.. I love this kernel btw!

Yea, been working on it almost daily. Alot of cool things in the works. Been tackling a rather frustrating bug but once resolved, release will be soon after. Thanks for everyone's patience.

Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app

 

[tidschi]

Any plans with F2FS?

 

[spartan268]

Any plans with F2FS?

At the moment there isn't. EAS is still the primary focus and further optimizing the kernel

 

[-DarkKnight-]

Does this kernel work with custom roms?

 

[Tomatot-]

Does this kernel work with custom roms?

Read title. Not yet.

 

[tidschi]

At the moment there isn't. EAS is still the primary focus and further optimizing the kernel

Installed it despite, after stock boot IMG and boots also fine?
Was an arter97 before flash.

 

[spartan268]

Installed it despite, after stock boot IMG and boots also fine?
Was an arter97 before flash.

Wait so you're saying you already have a F2FS data partition and successfully booted using RZ?

 

[tidschi]

Wait so you're saying you already have a F2FS data partition and successfully booted using RZ?

Exactly

 

[Lord. Tech]

Thank you @RenderBroken!

 

[RenderBroken]

Exactly

If you flashed RZ ontop of Arter's ramdisk, then it makes sense that f2fs would work as I would be applying my ramdisk changes to his ramdisk that has his f2fs changes already. I dont think this would work if flashing RZ over stock ramdisk. Still, you are much braver than I am. I love my working phone too much!

 

[RenderBroken]

RenderZenith for OOS-P-OP6: V1.2.0 is here!!!

First off, I am sorry this release took so long to get out. I found a rather nefarious issue with regards to boosting top-app/schedtune.boost. This means that in this latest build I have disabled Dynamic Stune boosting. I do know what the issue is now at least and we are working on figuring out a proper fix. Still, performance has somehow increased over the last official release.

Things to note:
* Upstreamed to 4.9.159
* Updates to latest OOS kernel source
* Further EAS changes
* Better load balancing / Task Placement

Download:
RZ-OP6-OOS-P-EAS-V1.2.0.zip

Changelog:
https://github.com/EAS-Project/op6-kernel/releases/tag/v1.2.0-oos

 

[frezd]

Hey,

Thanks a lor for your awesome Kernel which I currently use since the beginning.
However with the last one the I managed to use it and set it 300 mhz but looks like now the minimum isnnot even the base one 576 mhz , I cannot get below 652 mhz... Of course it s running quite smoothly, but for battery life when idel I would get guess idle at 300 mhz would eat less battery than at 652 mhz. Using Ex Kernel and pie 9.0.3 Otherwise no addon or else like Kernel tweaks etc


QQ : normal behavior done on purpose or is it a issue/feature...lol

If anyone else noticed that let me know

Thankd.

Best regards.

 

[spartan268]

Hey,

Thanks a lor for your awesome Kernel which I currently use since the beginning.
However with the last one the I managed to use it and set it 300 mhz but looks like now the minimum isnnot even the base one 576 mhz , I cannot get below 652 mhz... Of course it s running quite smoothly, but for battery life when idel I would get guess idle at 300 mhz would eat less battery than at 652 mhz. Using Ex Kernel and pie 9.0.3 Otherwise no addon or else like Kernel tweaks etc


QQ : normal behavior done on purpose or is it a issue/feature...lol

If anyone else noticed that let me know

Thankd.

Best regards.

This is totally expected behavior. Based on the current values of top app boost and schedboost it makes the small cores hover at 652 instead of the usual 576. I've actually gotten better battery life with the current setup.

Give it a cycle it two and see if it really makes a difference. I brought up the same remarks during the testing phase of the kernel.

 

[frezd]

This is totally expected behavior. Based on the current values of top app boost and schedboost it makes the small cores hover at 652 instead of the usual 576. I've actually gotten better battery life with the current setup.

Give it a cycle it two and see if it really makes a difference. I brought up the same remarks during the testing phase of the kernel.

Thanks, so I am not fool LOL, lets give it a try.

Best,

 

[MarcoCount]

This is totally expected behavior. Based on the current values of top app boost and schedboost it makes the small cores hover at 652 instead of the usual 576. I've actually gotten better battery life with the current setup.

Give it a cycle it two and see if it really makes a difference. I brought up the same remarks during the testing phase of the kernel.

Yes, I think this is expected but my battery life isn't improved.
I think it's a little worse than before.
I will have to test more.

 

[frezd]

Yes, I think this is expected but my battery life isn't improved.
I think it's a little worse than before.
I will have to test more.

After more than one days of testing, cores are moving up and down " weirdly"...if I can say so. Battery life for me worst than the 1.1 So back to 1.1 which for me gives me the best satisfaction.

So same conclusion unfortunately. 300mhz should.be in my opinion and should low faster to this level. My 2 cents...

1.1 best Kernel so far !

Best.

 

[Deacon-Frost]

Well, I cannot confirm that battery life worsened since I flashed version 1.2.

 

[spr33]

After more than one days of testing, cores are moving up and down " weirdly"...if I can say so. Battery life for me worst than the 1.1 So back to 1.1 which for me gives me the best satisfaction.

So same conclusion unfortunately. 300mhz should.be in my opinion and should low faster to this level. My 2 cents...

1.1 best Kernel so far !

Best.

The kernel has literally only been out for a day..

Anyway, one cycle is not enough to test a kernel. The power usage of 300mhz Vs both stock and 652mhz is negligible, hence why stock is 576mhz.