[Kernel]STi v2.40EX14[JB 4.3 FULLY WORKING][8-28-13]

[dsmboost]

Nice! Could always use some more boost.

 

[jthatch12]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.22/3 [JB/ICS]

I found a bug though. Performance gov is missing from stweaks . I'll upload a fix tonight

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

 

[jthatch12]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.22/3 [JB/ICS]

I think I found a bug. Im oc to 1300 but it not being used. CPU spy saying 1300 unused. Using your default profile with featured governors featured on op.

PS. Changed oc to 1400 same result. No oc on oc kernel

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app

I'll add a OC gov tonight as well as add performance gov back in Stweaks tonight.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

 

[kufusoto]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.22/3 [JB/ICS]

I love these new drivers and great kernal

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

 

[sykoj82]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.22/3 [JB/ICS]

I love these new drivers and great kernal

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

+1

Sent from my SGH-i777 using XDA Premium

 

[Lostboy2909]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.22/3 [JB/ICS]

What an amazing kernel. It's so smooth. Running it with your profile. Perfection.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

 

[jthatch12]

OP updated... added performance gov back into Stweaks. Made common kernel version number.

 

[badams1]

OP updated... added performance gov back into Stweaks. Made common kernel version number.

Really nice work...super smooth.

With this newest version...I am assuming that OC'ing is still disabled? I've become quite the fan of the HYPER gov OC'd
at 1.4...cpu spy shows 1.2 being the highest freq used.

Either way...this is the smoothest my phone has ever ran. (2/24 CM10.1)

 

[RockRatt]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.24 [JB/ICS]

Great Job jthatch. I have had NO issues with your kernel on ShoStock3 XWLSD since you sent me a test build. Question? Should I update it to one above since it is running great I don't want to mess with it really. Thanks again

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

 

[jthatch12]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.24 [JB/ICS]

Really nice work...super smooth.

With this newest version...I am assuming that OC'ing is still disabled? I've become quite the fan of the HYPER gov OC'd
at 1.4...cpu spy shows 1.2 being the highest freq used.

Either way...this is the smoothest my phone has ever ran. (2/24 CM10.1)

Performance gov will allow OC for the time being. Tonight I'll update HYPER

Great Job jthatch. I have had NO issues with your kernel on ShoStock3 XWLSD since you sent me a test build. Question? Should I update it to one above since it is running great I don't want to mess with it really. Thanks again

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

Some major changes but if the old version is still running good, I say stick with that

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

 

[cyberbandit1998]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.24 [JB/ICS]

I take it the new version has be Mali drivers also.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app

 

[topiratiko]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.24 [JB/ICS]

Confirm that hyper doesn't allow oc. Not that I oc but nevertheless an issue

Android Open Collective Project 412
Samsung Galaxy SII
Siyah 79 by AJ

 

[Nuskul]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.24 [JB/ICS]

Does the camera work on Sammy based roms?

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app

 

[jthatch12]

I take it the new version has be Mali drivers also.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app

There is a new version without and with the MALI drivers :good:

 

[jthatch12]

Does the camera work on Sammy based roms?

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app

You tell me

Confirm that hyper doesn't allow oc. Not that I oc but nevertheless an issue

Android Open Collective Project 412
Samsung Galaxy SII
Siyah 79 by AJ

I had no idea this many people liked to push the limits of their processors haha. I almost removed OC before release

 

[rav4kar]

Re: [Kernel]STi v2.24 [JB/ICS]

Does the camera work on Sammy based roms?

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app

Yes

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

---------- Post added at 05:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:52 PM ----------

You tell me

jthatch, good job man..keep it up.:thumbup:

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

 

[jthatch12]

Yes

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

---------- Post added at 05:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:52 PM ----------



jthatch, good job man..keep it up.:thumbup:

Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

:good: thanks buddy

 

[TheDude]

:good: thanks buddy

Yes, well done. Now, can you get my battery to last 48 hours? :highfive:

 

[SeanHacker]

@OP

Just curious. But why don't you keep original authorship on the commits in your source to credit those that the commits actually came from? Just wondering considering there is no original code and they are just commits from others, but you've take authorship of them? No need to take any offense because this post isn't intended like that. Just wondering what your reasoning for that is.

 

[jthatch12]

@OP

Just curious. But why don't you keep original authorship on the commits in your source to credit those that the commits actually came from? Just wondering considering there is no original code and they are just commits from others, but you've take authorship of them? No need to take any offense because this post isn't intended like that. Just wondering what your reasoning for that is.

Will do for now on, you're 100% right