Lazy Kernel for OP5/T - 10/27/2020
- Thread starter DeadRod
- Start date
Weeb is better as base... It would be better if there was a Telegram Chat too... For sharing testing betas... 
Maybe tag with different version name for testing.
Also heard people facing wifi issues in Weeb.
Also heard people facing wifi issues in Weeb.
I agree, Weeb's EAS is definitely better in terms of responsiveness & smoothness.Weeb is better as base... It would be better if there was a Telegram Chat too... For sharing testing betas...
But I still prefer Stock OOS kernel's HMP in terms of battery.
Just my opinion ?
So yeah, I'm sorry about being inactive for days when it comes to the forum as well as the long wait for the next version's arrival. I just recently passed my college's aptitude test (and passed yay), and now I'm back to working on it again. So far these are the changes (test builds version X):
- Upstreamed 4.4.220
- Updated weeb base
- Staged dynamic stune boost based on input
- New dynamic underclock (depends on DSBoost)
- Scheduler tweaks
- Memory management tweaks
- Removed CIB and Devfreq boost
- Removed stune assist
- Disabled PPP support (unnecessary)
- Removed noop
- Set CDG and fq qdisc as default
- Disabled more logging and debuging stuff
- and more that I may had forgotten...
I'm still fixing instabilities with the new integrations as I am really just a newbie or an amateur when it comes to coding. Nevertheless, I enjoy it and I do want to learn more.
)
About the TG group, I'm still thinking about it XD
Anyways, good day! :good:
- Upstreamed 4.4.220
- Updated weeb base
- Staged dynamic stune boost based on input
- New dynamic underclock (depends on DSBoost)
- Scheduler tweaks
- Memory management tweaks
- Removed CIB and Devfreq boost
- Removed stune assist
- Disabled PPP support (unnecessary)
- Removed noop
- Set CDG and fq qdisc as default
- Disabled more logging and debuging stuff
- and more that I may had forgotten...
I'm still fixing instabilities with the new integrations as I am really just a newbie or an amateur when it comes to coding. Nevertheless, I enjoy it and I do want to learn more.
)About the TG group, I'm still thinking about it XD
Anyways, good day! :good:
Yes it does support various kernel managers? I use Franco Kernel Manager. Although I'm still thinking of a way for everyone to at least have some control with the underclock and stuff. I can't assure though that I'll be able to do it in the next version.
Flashed the x33 test version it is very laggy, stutters a lot (maybe due to underclocks)...
The x28 was better in smoothness and performance.
Coming from latest weeb custom regression2 r34, Lazy x28 had less drain. But charging was a lot slower which was fixed in weeb from r30 builds after I tested and reported about it in Weeb chats.
But new Lazy x33 is a No-No situation here. If you're using weeb as base, r34 is a complete package with faster charging and smoothness.
And the overall spaker sound is also way less in Lazy kernel.
Um just sharing my reports as i want Lazy kernel to grow at its best. Perdon me if um wrong.
Last edited:
last week i tried this kernel.cant remember which build it was but battery life was amazing.sometimes apps lagged and system froze for couple of seconds.so iwill wait until that issue is gone.
Sorry about that XD. Try v40, it should have both underclock and stune boost working, with low jitters.
EDIT: Underclock was broken at that version.
Last edited:
Okay, Downloading... But really waiting for a TG Chat tho... Way to easy to communicate and share files there!
I assume it's a custom rom with different qcacld implementation. My kernel is based-off weeb, so anything that weeb doesn't work with, same condition applies to mine.
UPDATE: Finally after a lot of testing, I completely simplified and overhauled dynamic underclock and improved dsboost. The current and upcoming test versions should be more smooth and stable.
The kerne lazy test l is a bit lagey. In my opinion the best kernel for pixel rom is V5. But it is my opinion, I insist. I have not tried in other ROMs since the pixel with V5 works perfect
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5000 mediante Tapatalk
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5000 mediante Tapatalk
Huh, that's strange, I have a more smoother experience with the new test builds. Try the latest one and change top-app sched_boost value with a kernel manager, it'll change the dynamic stune boost on input value. The default is 2 (not shown in kernel manager since it's hardcoded to the kernel and it triggers if sched_boost is equal to zero). You could also disable it (input dsboost) by putting -1 to the sched_boost value.
EDIT: It could be because of the change with timer frequency and pelt half-life. I'll try to bring it back with version 56 and I'll see if the battery doesn't drain a lot.
Last edited:
To those who uses OOS, there's a working OOS build in the repo! It's by-far same as custom (base is also weeb).
I'm currently using it and it's working great.
I'm currently using it and it's working great.
Our Apps
Get our official app!
The best way to access XDA on your phone
Nav Gestures
Add swipe gestures to any Android
One Handed Mode
Eases uses one hand with your phone