Lightweight Android 6.0 For Nexus 7 (2012) WIFI ONLY

[Ramon Dag]

Kid, even if it would be that case, the app "android system"'s version would be 6.0. You just built android 5, and setting its version code to 6.0 and adding the new boot animation in 2nd zip. Also, in build.prop, you have api version 21 and build fingerprint is also LRX21P / 5.0. Don't think I'm an idiot.

Or tell me why all those features aren't working in your ROM, but in real Marshmallow port by dmitrygr they do work.

This ROM is based off android 6.0 then ported to the nexus 7 2012
IF you are going to stay here and be annoying then you can leave
Their are 5+ people who have tested the ROM and found it fast, stable and based
Off android 6.0
Also some of the features are not working because of hardware requirements and the
Multi window is their but does not appear because of a bug and that will get fixed in the next update .

 

[Naitsabes123]

And most of these accouts (4, edit. now 5) were created on 15th/16th october and have 3 or less posts (and just one has one second post in another thread).
broad hint?

 

[KawaiiAurora]

Very amusing 'scam' :3 The people who say the ROM is any good look like fakes.. This should be locked...

 

[TheXorg]

This ROM is based off android 6.0 then ported to the nexus 7 2012
IF you are going to stay here and be annoying then you can leave
Their are 5+ people who have tested the ROM and found it fast, stable and based
Off android 6.0
Also some of the features are not working because of hardware requirements and the
Multi window is their but does not appear because of a bug and that will get fixed in the next update .

Tell me ONE thing where I can surely see it IS android 6. And don't tell me to look in settings / about, that's a value you can easily change.

Otherwise, it's strange how all those users have just registered and just posted on your thread.

I don't hate you, but I think scam is a thing we don't need on XDA.

 

[Ramon Dag]

Very amusing 'scam' :3 The people who say the ROM is any good look like fakes.. This should be locked...

How are they fakes????, explane why??? and one of the people that have said its a good ROM
have a YouTube channel as well
Also have you actually tried the ROM????
I guaranty that its not a fake, you can download it and install .
See for your self.

 

[Ramon Dag]

Tell me ONE thing where I can surely see it IS android 6. And don't tell me to look in settings / about, that's a value you can easily change.

Otherwise, it's strange how all those users have just registered and just posted on your thread.

I don't hate you, but I think scam is a thing we don't need on XDA.

You can run antu benchmarks and see the results there.

 

[Ramon Dag]

Why can't we all just not argue.
I mean the ROM works it fast and stable their is no reason to agrue about if it's fake or not.
If you want to try it download it and install it, their doent need to be all this arguing.

 

[KawaiiAurora]

Yes, there's reason to argue because you are branding it as Android M (6.0) and it's actually Lolipop (5.0). All the people who left positivite comments don't even have 1 thanks which kinda shows they're inexperienced. I would suggest trying a better forgery next time!

 

[TheXorg]

Why can't we all just not argue.
I mean the ROM works it fast and stable their is no reason to agrue about if it's fake or not.
If you want to try it download it and install it, their doent need to be all this arguing.

you don't even need to flash it to see it's fake. "your" part1.zip has exactly the same md5sum as the 01-05-15 build of xenon hd. In your part2.zip you edit the displayed android version and label it as "yours".

[email protected]:~/Programmieren/Android$ md5sum part1.zip update-XenonHD-01-05-15-signed-grouper.zip 
ddd0a56f118bc4946d5a02333b56fde7  part1.zip
ddd0a56f118bc4946d5a02333b56fde7  update-XenonHD-01-05-15-signed-grouper.zip
[email protected]:~/Programmieren/Android$

If you think I lie, do it yourself. But I think you already know that and you're just lying all the time. Also funny how you removed the build fingerprint from your part2

 

[Tokamps3]

Woo, maybe I missed something. My experience is based on the 6.0 rom from dmitrygr mentioned in post 2 or 3. Sorry for any misunderstanding.

 

[LenAsh]

Thread closed.

Members are reminded that we appreciate posts with actual content. Not virtual stuff... and something not taken from others would be a Good Thing.