[Lineage] [Unofficial] [2018-06-27] Phh-Treble
- Thread starter phhusson
- Start date
- Status
Don't use this, it's deprecated. Go here instead. I think you're Arm A only. I'm not positive on that. You can check your build.prop near the bottom and it should tell you. On Andy's builds you'll want arm_avn for A-Only.
i dont understand sorry m noop with these things
i dont understand sorry m noop with these things
I tried installing the v5, system image for arm-32 with gapps on my MOTO G6 . It is based on a 32 bit architecture of the os. i tried installing the image with the help of twrp, but after doing so it shows no os installed. I didn't reboot coz I knew that it will get stuck in the bootloop.
so shall do I have to wait for a proper dedicated LOS for mt moto G6?
so shall do I have to wait for a proper dedicated LOS for mt moto G6?
Connectivity problems on lineage 15.1 Xiaomi Redmi 6a
Hi Phhusson!
Thanks for the brilliant work - very nice ROM. Was running a Redmi 6a, custom TWRP build and the boot.img from the resurrection remix install guide here https(colon)//xiaomifirmware(dot)com/roms/download-resurrection-remix-for-redmi-6a/
Only issue I have - initially worked perfectly, but 1 week into use suddenly lost all connectivity - data, calls, sms everything.
Reinstalling the ROM results in the same problem - any ideas? Maybe an issue with the kernel?
Different roms have their own issues, AEX (AOSP Extended) and pixel experience for Redmi 6a running global stable vendor from Xiaomi are both unable to receive sms messages ( bit of a deal breaker, need sms messages for bank notifications and so forth)
Hi Phhusson!
Thanks for the brilliant work - very nice ROM. Was running a Redmi 6a, custom TWRP build and the boot.img from the resurrection remix install guide here https(colon)//xiaomifirmware(dot)com/roms/download-resurrection-remix-for-redmi-6a/
Only issue I have - initially worked perfectly, but 1 week into use suddenly lost all connectivity - data, calls, sms everything.
Reinstalling the ROM results in the same problem - any ideas? Maybe an issue with the kernel?
Different roms have their own issues, AEX (AOSP Extended) and pixel experience for Redmi 6a running global stable vendor from Xiaomi are both unable to receive sms messages ( bit of a deal breaker, need sms messages for bank notifications and so forth)
Hi, There Can any one suggest GSI rom for Redmagic 3 from Nubia.
This handset has a great hardware but lacks a good user experience
---------- Post added at 12:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 PM ----------
Hi, There Can any one suggest GSI rom for Redmagic 3 from Nubia.
This handset has a great hardware but lacks a good user experience
This handset has a great hardware but lacks a good user experience
---------- Post added at 12:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 PM ----------
Hi, There Can any one suggest GSI rom for Redmagic 3 from Nubia.
This handset has a great hardware but lacks a good user experience
Thanks for the reply, I have 2 questions may seem to be silly.
1. Do we need twrp or can be flashed using the stock recovery and then wipe cache and data as redmagic 3 international version dosent have Twrp.
2. Only need to flash the system.img file and if no twrp then can it done using adb.
Thanks in advance for the support and help
well not adb not stock recovery etc
*fastboot
fastboot flash system system.img
first search unlocking bootloader ... then proceed
Thank you (and so many more people...) very much for this build. I installed it on my Samsung A8 (the vanilla version) and it works well. Some quirks though. I installed microG (following the microG site, installing all the necessary components), and doing the check, it didn't tick all the boxes. Yet, using the spoof checker, it says the ROM is spoofing enabled. Using Aurora (Google Play fake..), I can install apps from the store. So question is: is the ROM (GSI) spoofing enabled?
Last edited:
Deleted
---------- Post added at 10:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------
I would say yes.
Btw i never installed microG over the website. If you have twrp i can only suggest to you use Nanodroid.
Link:
https://xdaforums.com/apps/magisk/module-nanomod-5-0-20170405-microg-t3584928
---------- Post added at 10:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------
I would say yes.
Btw i never installed microG over the website. If you have twrp i can only suggest to you use Nanodroid.
Link:
https://xdaforums.com/apps/magisk/module-nanomod-5-0-20170405-microg-t3584928
Last edited:
Thanks. I did try nanodroid (https://downloads.nanolx.org/NanoDroid/Stable/NanoDroid-patcher-22.5.1.20200102.zip) but it gave an error (ERROR 1) when installing from TWRP.
Having said that, when installing aurora (from F-droid), I still can install apps from the appstore using aurora's fake gmail address....
EDIT: installing microG from TWRP improved, but did not completely resolve the check boxes issue.
Having said that, when installing aurora (from F-droid), I still can install apps from the appstore using aurora's fake gmail address....
EDIT: installing microG from TWRP improved, but did not completely resolve the check boxes issue.
Last edited:
Upload a log of the failing Installation in Nanodroid thread. Then the dev could look into that.
Atm i have three theories:
- the spoofing test app is wrong (but don't really think that's the reason because in the past i used another LOS 17 gsi rom and Nanodroid hadn't any problem)
- the twrp which you use has a problem with Nanodroid
- the Nanodroid package itself has a bug which your twrp triggers
But well without logs it hard to say what exactly is the problem. Or does your twrp give more information than just error 1 in the GUI?
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
Top Liked Posts
-
There are no posts matching your filters.
-
180Hi all,
I've made my work on AOSP Phh-Treble as modular as possible, so that it can be reused on other ROMs.
As part of this effort, I'm releasing GSIs of LineageOS
This is a GSI, and true to the GSI spirit. It aims at supporting a maximum number of devices, but only with AOSP-available hardware features.
All credits obviously goes to LineageOS developers
v5: (2018-06-27)
Image for ARM64 A-only device with gapps
Image for ARM64 A-only device vanilla
Image for ARM64 A/B device with gapps
Image for ARM64 A/B device vanilla
Image for ARM32 A-only device with Android Go gapps
Image for ARM32 A-only device vanilla
v4: (2018-05-19)
Image for ARM64 A-only device
Image for ARM64 A/B device
Image for ARM32 A-only device
Image for ARM32 A-only devices, with Android Go gapps
V3: (2018-04-05)
Image for ARM64 A-only device
Image for ARM64 A/B device
Image for ARM32 A-only device
ChangeLog:
v4 (2018-05-19):
- Blackview A20 edition! Thanks to blackview for giving me this Android Go test device
- Fix Accents
- Update to latest AOSP Phh-Treble patches
- New Android Go variant with gapps
v3 (2018-04-05):
- Fix Galaxy S9 backlight control
- Support exfat sdcards on devices with exfat support in kernel
- Resize /system to maximum size on first boot
v2 (2018-03-26):
- Fix Galaxy S9 backlight control
How to build:
Code:git clone https://github.com/phhusson/treble_experimentations mkdir Lineage; cd Lineage bash ../treble_experimentations/build-rom.sh android-8.1 lineage88June patches only just got merged into LOS a few days ago.
Not to mention, @phhusson has at least 3 ROMs he's maintaining here alone. Give him a bit.
85
No. Devs do their work for free. They go through hours of their own time, wearing their own hardware, using their own knowledge, solving headaches after headaches, all of that... For free.
It's a matter of respect. It's written all over XDA rules. If any user is not pleased with a project's speed, they can get the sources and do what they want by themselves.
This has been said and continues to be said a million times all over this community, is it so hard to read the rules upon signing up to this?
If someone is doing something for free, the one and only answer to those questions is simply "when it's ready. You want faster, do it yourself or pay someone to do it"
