Magisk General Support / Discussion

Search This thread

m_pastuszek

Member
Jan 30, 2017
19
16
Poland
mpastuszek.pl
Google Pixel 6
You said that you tried with Pixel Flasher - suggesting you to ask in the corresponding thread that is dedicated to Pixels, here we are users of all vendors (Samsung, Xiaomi, etc)

Also, if you previously did Hide Magisk app, you had to unhide before trying to re-install Magisk.
That's a common case resulting that newly installed Magisk app does cannot recognize root
There's solution! It seems that Google broke something in boot image. Flashing pathed image from Pixel 7 makes it working again. See GitHub issue: https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/issues/6441

Pixel 6 -> Pixel 7 boot image
Pixel 6 Pro -> Pixel 7 Pro boot image
 
Last edited:

pndwal

Senior Member
Just catching up, n very interesting solution... 👍
@zgfg flashing pathed boot.img and vendor_boot.img don't work too.
Patching vendor_boot.img shouldn't work for any device...

Two GKI Boot Images for P6 series

Vendor ramdisks were moved out of boot.img when GKI became a thing for Treble compatibility and we got the two boot images, vendor_boot + boot.img, the latter retaining the 'generic' ramdisk which constitutes 'ramdisk' for magiskinit purposes...

Four GKI Boot Images for P7 series

With Pixel 7 (A13 LV), boot images have become four with new GKI boot.img further losing generic ramdisk to init_boot.img (so P7 users must patch that) and boot.img retaining basically the kernel only... Also, vendor_boot.img is further split, losing a vendor_boot multi-ramdisk option, dlkm (dynamically loadable kernel modules for boot-time use) to ramdisk in vendor_kernel_boot.img w/ vendor_boot.img retaining vendor ramdisks...
We found solution. It seems that Google broke something in boot image. Flashing pathed image from Pixel 7 makes it working again. See GitHub issue: https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/issues/6441
...So P7 boot.img contains kernel only as discussed above...

Magisk has manually added a basic generic ramdisk where missing in boot.img for some time. (This allows legacy SAR A-only devices w/ a compatible bootloader and no OEM supplied generic ramdisk in boot to use Magisk in boot mode instead of recovery mode.) This functionality was also made compatible with some A13 GKIs for P6 series etc (expanding use to "# Stock A only legacy SAR, or some Android 13 GKIs") along with a needed ramdisk compression format fix (I believe only the compression format fix is generally needed) here:
https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/commit/985249c3d0bccff479f8c1efd5967922ab8d855e

It appears that by the fluke of this fix doing more than simply correcting the compression format, a compatible boot.img lacking ramdisk (eg P7 kernel only) can have a working generic ramdisk manually added successfully by Magisk for use in P6...

That a P7 kernel is even compatible is the real surprise to me however!... 😀

... Seems that that beta update may not even boot... Canyie says user reports updating simply rolls back to old ROM!(?)...

Out of interest, do you need to use disable-verity / --disable-verification in vbmeta to boot using P7 patched boot.img in P6?

👍 PW
 
Last edited:

Lughnasadh

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
4,953
5,715
Google Nexus 5
Huawei Nexus 6P
... Seems that that beta update may not even boot... Canyie says user reports updating simply rolls back to old ROM!(?)...
The QPR2 Beta 1 build (without any modifications) does boot on the Pixel 6 series.
Out of interest, do you need to use disable-verity / --disable-verification in vbmeta to boot using P7 patched boot.img in P6?
No, but you may need to if using a custom kernel.

For the Pixel 7 series, disabling both verity and verification is required to run custom kernels, although you can flash a custom kernel with these flags enabled (it won't boot), then wipe, then flash the custom kernel again with success. But of course this requires a wipe which users are trying to avoid so keeping verity and verification disabled when updating each month is the best way to go about it so you don't have to wipe (except for the initial instance where you disable those flags).

For the Pixel 6 series, although not required in most instances, disabling verity and verification can help to avoid issues, especially the red eio corrupt message (which is really innocuous but bothers many users), when updating builds, flashing custom kernels, etc..

But I digress...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pndwal

Loustsoul

Senior Member
Where does a module have options?

Reinstall your modules until you find the right one. Change the option to hide the clock and see if it reverses itself. At worst you will know which module, and you can try to contact the author.

Or, as I said, start over by reinstalling your ROM and make different choices.
This is the thing I did for the clock to go away. I had to wipe and re-flash, but I tried dirty flash first but it stayed no clock.
 

Loustsoul

Senior Member
Where does a module have options?

Reinstall your modules until you find the right one. Change the option to hide the clock and see if it reverses itself. At worst you will know which module, and you can try to contact the author.

Or, as I said, start over by reinstalling your ROM and make different choices.
This is the hide clock thing that I used. I had to wipe and re-flash to get rid of it.
 

Ștefan Radu

Member
Feb 11, 2018
8
4
So I need some help :( Today, after installing a Magisk module my phone got stuck into bootloop. What I've tried so far:
  • deleting the faulty module
  • deleting all modules
  • magisk remove-modules
  • reinstalling magisk
  • dirty flashing rom
  • reflashing ROM boot image
  • booting into safe mode??? (doesn't work)
  • reflashing recovery
  • angrily staring at the wall as nothing works
An obvious solution would be to wipe everything and install the ROM from scratch, but that's not really a good option, as I want to keep my data. From what I've read online, the device has the data partition encrypted at startup but I don't know what to make of that. I can access the device via adb while booting, but everything is readonly. Also, when Magisk is installed I can get root access with `su`. I'm open to any suggestions.

Device: Samsung Galaxy S10e (beyond0lte) Exynos CPU
OS: LineageOS with MicroG
Recovery: Lineage Recovery

PS: I don't know if I posted this in the right place. Correct me if I didn't.
 
Last edited:

zgfg

Senior Member
Oct 10, 2016
8,557
6,282
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Same to the last asus zenfone 7 firmware 31.0210.0210.309. The patched "boot.img" doesn't work anymore. 😩
Be aware that the problem for that Beta Pixel update is very specific - it was described further in the discussion (as well as the solution was posted)

Of course, there is always a slim possibility that you have the same issue on your Zen phone, but there could be other reasons for "not working", specially if one does not even describe what does it mean (not booting, booting but Magisk app not finding Magisk, etc), and without additional info about the Android version, etc
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: J.Michael

J.Michael

Recognized Contributor
Jan 20, 2018
1,652
1,830
Samsung Galaxy Tab A series
So I need some help :( Today, after installing a Magisk module my phone got stuck into bootloop. What I've tried so far:
  • deleting the faulty module
  • deleting all modules
  • magisk remove-modules
  • reinstalling magisk
  • dirty flashing rom
  • reflashing ROM boot image
  • booting into safe mode??? (doesn't work)
  • reflashing recovery
  • angrily staring at the wall as nothing works
An obvious solution would be to wipe everything and install the ROM from scratch, but that's not really a good option, as I want to keep my data. From what I've read online, the device has the data partition encrypted at startup but I don't know what to make of that. I can access the device via adb while booting, but everything is readonly. Also, when Magisk is installed I can get root access with `su`. I'm open to any suggestions.

Device: Samsung Galaxy S10e (beyond0lte) Exynos CPU
OS: LineageOS with MicroG
Recovery: Lineage Recovery

PS: I don't know if I posted this in the right place. Correct me if I didn't.
If the bootloop started when you installed a Magisk module, then removing the module should have fixed it. If you tried to remove or disable the module, but that didn't fix it, I think you should have tried harder -- make sure you really removed the module before flailing around doing everything else you could think of.

I do not understand "when Magisk is installed I can get root access with `su`."

Are you able to boot now?

If "dirty flashing ROM" means you reinstalled the stock ROM, were you able to boot at that point?

When you say "booting into safe mode" doesn't work, how doesn't work? It was supposed to be: boot into safe mode, reboot, at that point you would have Magisk but no modules enabled -- just for that one boot. If you've already replaced the boot image that used to have Magisk installed, I don't know what safe mode could accomplish. But it should still be possible to boot into safe mode.

Maybe forget what you've done, just describe the current state of the device: what software you think is installed, and whether you can boot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rodken and m0han

Ștefan Radu

Member
Feb 11, 2018
8
4
If the bootloop started when you installed a Magisk module, then removing the module should have fixed it. If you tried to remove or disable the module, but that didn't fix it, I think you should have tried harder -- make sure you really removed the module before flailing around doing everything else you could think of.

I do not understand "when Magisk is installed I can get root access with `su`."

Are you able to boot now?

If "dirty flashing ROM" means you reinstalled the stock ROM, were you able to boot at that point?

When you say "booting into safe mode" doesn't work, how doesn't work? It was supposed to be: boot into safe mode, reboot, at that point you would have Magisk but no modules enabled -- just for that one boot. If you've already replaced the boot image that used to have Magisk installed, I don't know what safe mode could accomplish. But it should still be possible to boot into safe mode.

Maybe forget what you've done, just describe the current state of the device: what software you think is installed, and whether you can boot.
I am not able to boot. I wasn't able to boot at any point in the process.
The last thing I tried was reflashing the Lineage recovery and then dirty flashing the stock ROM.
I am able to access recovery, and get a shell into the device while it tries to boot up.

What I was reffering to "getting root access" is the following: If I would sideload magisk apk on top of what I've got right now, I could use `su` in the adb shell to get root (which is the expected behaviour I suppose)
 
  • Like
Reactions: J.Michael

dr4go

Senior Member
Dec 17, 2010
473
395
Vienna
I am not able to boot. I wasn't able to boot at any point in the process.
The last thing I tried was reflashing the Lineage recovery and then dirty flashing the stock ROM.
I am able to access recovery, and get a shell into the device while it tries to boot up.

What I was reffering to "getting root access" is the following: If I would sideload magisk apk on top of what I've got right now, I could use `su` in the adb shell to get root (which is the expected behaviour I suppose)
The only thing that comes to my mind... has your data partition the full size or has it been shrunk to 32GB? Otherwise... I really do feel for you... I wasn't able to recover from my bootloop last year (S10 user). My new phone finally arrived... so I need to prepare a long overdue post...
 

Ștefan Radu

Member
Feb 11, 2018
8
4
The only thing that comes to my mind... has your data partition the full size or has it been shrunk to 32GB? Otherwise... I really do feel for you... I wasn't able to recover from my bootloop last year (S10 user). My new phone finally arrived... so I need to prepare a long overdue post...
Bash:
beyond0lte:/ $ df -h /data
Filesystem       Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/block/sda31 109G  27G   82G  25% /data/user/0

Seem like the data partition is 109GB.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: dr4go

Ștefan Radu

Member
Feb 11, 2018
8
4
If the bootloop started when you installed a Magisk module, then removing the module should have fixed it. If you tried to remove or disable the module, but that didn't fix it, I think you should have tried harder -- make sure you really removed the module before flailing around doing everything else you could think of.

I do not understand "when Magisk is installed I can get root access with `su`."

Are you able to boot now?

If "dirty flashing ROM" means you reinstalled the stock ROM, were you able to boot at that point?

When you say "booting into safe mode" doesn't work, how doesn't work? It was supposed to be: boot into safe mode, reboot, at that point you would have Magisk but no modules enabled -- just for that one boot. If you've already replaced the boot image that used to have Magisk installed, I don't know what safe mode could accomplish. But it should still be possible to boot into safe mode.

Maybe forget what you've done, just describe the current state of the device: what software you think is installed, and whether you can boot.
do you have any suggestion on what I could be the issue and what I could try?
 

kerlaeda08

Member
Nov 21, 2022
6
1
hello, got a root on a samsung a 50, everything works, but there was a problem. the screen auto-rotate works in the system itself, but it does not work in applications (for example, fb reader) the firmware is standard (11 android)
 
Last edited:

Top Liked Posts

  • 2
    Hey guys, have the latest magisk canary build sis systemless hosts enabled. i updated to the new adaway apk and I cant get past the syncing screen "Failed to sync". any suggestions? Some say its an issue with the latest magisk?
    Unfortunately, it's kind of a trap and nobody reads in advance but later asks for help when in trouble

    There are numerous posts during the last weeks that support for systemless modules (incl. Systemless hosts) is broken in Canary v25210, and the posts with instructions how to download and roll back (to avoid repeating the whole story)
  • 12
    . . . found a YT video that explains you can download the APK, rename to .zip, and install it as a module. Hopefully that works 😯
    Not only does it work, but if you take a few extra steps, you can make a 100% clean install of ANY Magisk version or fork without PC or TWRP.
    Here's how I do it :-

    - Download Magisk version/fork you want to try
    - Add .zip to the end of the Magisk apk eg: Magisk.apk becomes Magisk.apk.zip
    - Unhide the Magisk app if you have hidden/renamed it
    - Turn on aeroplane mode
    - Delete /data/adb/Magisk folder and /data/adb/magisk.db file
    - In Magisk app, perform Uninstall Magisk - RESTORE IMAGES so you are back on stock boot image
    - Install the new Magisk.apk.zip as a module
    - Change Magisk.apk.zip back to Magisk.apk
    - Uninstall the Magisk app (the apk only NOT Magisk itself)
    - Reboot
    - Install the new Magisk.apk
    - Open it up and check settings and modules and customise to your needs eg: zygisk may need to be re-enabled and deny list reconfigured
    - Reboot again and turn off aeroplane mode

    You will now be on a new clean install of whatever Magisk you are trying. No loss of root or modules and no need to clear data from play services to re-enable wallet (assuming it worked before and you set everything up properly)
    Only thing left to do is grant root to whatever apps need it.
    11
    how/where do you get prior canary builds if you're on the latest?
    Magisk canary builds are available on GitHub.
    You just have to look at the history. 🙃

    Canary builds are hosted in the magisk-files repo.
    magisk-files (Canary commit history) - [GitHub] - Link
    Select the build commit you are looking for.
    Select the apk file and "View File".
    You can then Download or "View raw".
    Since it can not show you the raw file, it will start the download of the file.
    mcanary1.png
    mcanary2.png
    mcanary3.png
    mcanary4.png

    Cheers. :cowboy:
    10
    Latest Canary (+Debug) Magisk:

    Magisk (e5641d5b) (25208)​

    • Fix release builds

    Diffs to v25.2​

    • [General] New magic mount backend. It supports loading modules into system with overlayfs files injected
    • [MagiskPolicy] Fix minor bug in command line argument parsing
    • [Zygisk] Prevent crashing daemon in error
    • [Zygisk] Rewrite zygote code injection with new loader library approach
    • [Zygisk] Release new API version 4
    • [App] Make stub patching 100% offline
    • [App] Support patching init_boot.img for Samsung ODIN firmware
    • [MagiskInit] Support replacing existing *.rc files in overlay.d
    • [MagiskInit] Rewrite sepolicy.rules mounting and loading implementation
    https://github.com/topjohnwu/magisk-files/blob/0e63c640c4b8799609d6cf3bdd4f88b2e8df4c08/notes.md

    👍 PW
    10
    Thread lightly cleaned!

    @S8rooted&tooted and @pndwal

    Greetings to you both. As you have both noticed, I have cleaned this thread of some of your recent comments. I will politely ask you both to please refrain from
    further OT and argumentative comments, and to please conduct yourselves in accordance with XDA Rule #2.3 for member conduct:

    2.3 Flaming / Lack of respect: XDA is about sharing and this does not involve virtual yelling (flaming) or rudeness. Flaming or posting with a lack of respect is unacceptable. Treat new members in the manner in which you would like to have been treated when you were a new member. When dealing with any member, provide them with guidance, advice and instructions when you can, showing them respect and courtesy. Never post in a demanding, argumentative, disrespectful or self-righteous manner.

    If you wish to argue further, then please do so via PM's, or another platform since XDA is not the place for these types of discussions on the public forums. Please be advised, posts which continue to violate the forum rules will be removed with immediate effect, and posiible sanctions applied to your account should things get too far out of hand, which we certainly do not want.
    So please let this be the end of this here and now.

    Thank you for your cooperation, and hope you have a pleasant day.

    Best regards: Badger50
    8
    View attachment 5853939
    @osm0sis now they are going to remove custom recovery support 😂

    It is because Magisk can't work properly on some broken custom recoveries, which mount partitions with wrong devices...
    Found no way to workaround it other than detecting and warning user to reinstall Magisk manually...
  • 1091
    This is the place for general support and discussion regarding "Public Releases", which includes both stable and beta releases.
    All information, including troubleshoot guides and notes, are in the Announcement Thread
    156
    Hello, I haven't given much support on XDA lately. It can be resulted from
    • University started and I have limited free time. In fact, I mostly develop during midnight
    • I live in Taiwan, which has large time zone differences between my European/American contributors/testers, which usually forces me to stay up late at night to discuss/test stuffs.
    • The new version is about to come, I don't want to spend effort on supporting old releases
    The planned update is delayed again and again, to some point I think I'll shed some light about what has been happening lately, also along with some announcements.

    New Forum!
    As you might have already discovered, Magisk got its own subforum on XDA! Many thanks to all the support you gave me, and much more information/features/support is about to come!
    **For developers supporting all the devices that are not using standard Android boot format, feel free to create threads in this section (actually, PLEASE do so) for your favorite devices after v7 is out. As I currently know, Asus devices require signing the boot image before flashing, and is model dependant; Sony devices seems to use ELF kernel that is unpatchable, or some has two ramdisks (inner + outer), both requires different workarounds; LG bootloader locked devices has to manually "BUMP" the boot image after flashing Magisk..... and there may be lots of other crazy boot image formats that haven't come up to my attention yet.
    It is impossible for me to support all these non-standard boot images, and I hope the community can collaborate to make Magisk running across all the devices. Overall, community collaboration is what XDA about :D

    The Pixel Phone
    Some of you might already know this news, that the next Pixel Phone right around the corner seems like it does not have ramdisk in boot image, which pretty much wrecked Magisk in all ways. However, it pretty much doomed root itself too. Kernel modifications is inevitable IMO, so I'll try to migrate my scripts to C programs that could possibly be included into the kernel itself. Note that I'm not familiar with linux kernel, I'm not even sure if my idea and concept is correct or not. But once the device is available, I think developers will find a way to bypass all the difficulties, and I'll do my best to learn things ;)

    Current Progress
    In the past month, I've spent quite some time learning SELinux, so that I can avoid using SuperSU's sepolicy patches. Thanks to the helps and tips from @phhusson and @Chainfire, I finally have a much clearer understanding of how SELinux works. The Magisk core parts (the scripts, boot image patches, new features, more supports) are actually done some time ago. What is causing all the delays is the Magisk Manager.
    To be completely honest, although I can code in Java without much issues, Magisk Manager is actually my first Android application, I had to reach out for assistance, and fortunately awesome developers like @DVDandroid and @digitalhigh contributed a lot, which makes the current Manager awesome.
    After the repo system and module management is mostly done, I was about to do some adjustments and release, but what we really done is decided to add another feature: auto-unroot with per-app settings. I decided to wait for it to be finished, and then do my adjustments. Due to reasons that'll be mentioned later, this feature will likely not be available for the next release (should come in future updates)

    Safety Net Disaster
    Those who are using Magisk for Safety Net bypass purposes must have known that Google recently updated the detection method of my Systemless Xposed. I still have no idea what Safety Net is detecting, so currently I cannot fix it on my side (also because I'm busy working on the next update). However, suhide developed by @Chainfire is able to hide Xposed and worked fine.
    However, only my Systemless Xposed v86.2, which is based on SuperSU's su.d, is supported using that method. v86.2 and v86.5 (latest, Magisk based) have nearly identical binaries, and the only difference is the path where the binaries are stored.
    I'm still not sure what's the real issue for it not being supported, I just hope it is not done intentionally.

    Conclusion
    Due to the fact that my Safety Net bypass is not 100% perfect now, I do not want to spend any more time waiting for auto-unroot to be polished. What I'm doing now is finishing up all the things I'd like to change in Magisk Manager (it has been a while since I last contributed to Manager, my fellow developers are doing all the heavy job), which might take a little more time, after that, packed with tons of information to be announced in Magisk Section, I'll release the long awaited update.

    Hope this lengthy post gives you the idea of the whole situation, and again thanks for all your support!!
    121
    Ah, some Chainfire bashing, I hope it is not too late for me to exercise additional villainy.

    First, let me make clear I have nothing against @topjohnwu, nor against Magisk. Magisk is an interesting project and it certainly displays @topjohnwu ingenuity and persistence. I don't doubt we will see more interesting things from his hands.

    -------------------------

    What has happened here is not all that dark and complicated, from either end. I returned from holidays, and someone pointed me at Magisk. My first thought: interesting!

    Among other things, the thread lists some issues with SuperSU, which in combination with the phrase The developer also requests users to not bug Chainfire with compatibility requests for SuperSU with Magisk from the portal article, raised my left eyebrow by nigh half an inch. The popular systemless xposed mod is apparently now based on it, and apparently it now no longer works with SuperSU, and apparently I'm not supposed to fix that, nor any of the other found issues. I found that a bit weird. So yes, I have told @topjohnwu that I was a bit surprised he was posting about issues with SuperSU without notifying me about them (I can't fix or help fix issues I'm not aware of, after all).

    He's also spreading a modified version of the SuperSU package, which is not all that uncommon, nor necessarily a problem. I have not looked into what he modified, I only ran a few quick tests on one of my devices, and found some commonly used commands run as root to be broken. I have informed him of this as well.

    It appears the tool of choice for Magisk is phh's Superuser, because of some of the mentioned issues with SuperSU. That's fine by itself, but fixing issues in that superuser by incorporating SuperSU's binaries into it is a somewhat questionable practise. After all, SuperSU is a commercial closed-source package that helps pay for my dinner, and superuser is a direct competitor. I have informed him that I was surprised he did this without asking for permission. I have expressed similar surprise on him spreading a modified version of LiveBoot (which helps pay for a snack now and then).
    @topjohnwu has also stated that Magisk's scripts are largely influenced by mine (I have not checked). Scripts based on mine are used all over the place on XDA, some people have crafted amazing things based on them, I have never made an issue of this (otherwise I would have just made them binaries). But yes, I have also stated to him that I don't think it's very nice to base something on one program, and then using that to (almost exclusively) push something directly competing with that program.

    tl;dr Towards @topjohnwu, I have:
    - expressed surprise he has issues getting Magisk to work with SuperSU, and has chosen not to inform me about those
    - expressed surprise he is using SuperSU binaries in a competing superuser without permission
    - expressed surprise he is posting a modified LiveBoot without permission
    - informed him of issues with the modified SuperSU he has posted
    - let him know I thought it wasn't very nice to be applying my scripts to benefit seemingly exclusively that same competing superuser

    To be crystal clear:
    - I have not asked for an apology
    - I have not asked for Magisk to be abandoned, neither the root hiding nor systemless module parts, and certainly not systemless xposed
    - I have not made an issue of any of this anywhere, until this post
    - I have not even specifically asked for anything to be taken down (though obviously in my opinion the other superuser package mixed with SuperSU's binaries, as well as the LiveBoot package, should go)
    - I have not reported this thread to XDA moderators for copyright violations or otherwise

    While my conversation with @topjohnwu may not win any awards for being friendly (though it may win some for brevity), I think all things considered my response has been rather mild. To be perfectly honest, until the apology post, I thought this was over with already. I think the apology post was triggered because I haven't replied to his last PM for a while - I was in the zone, it happens.

    To emphasize again, I have nothing against @topjohnwu, Magisk, or systemless xposed, and it is certainly not my goal to see any of them go. If it can be made to work together with SuperSU, great.

    I get it though: you think of something, you want to see if you can make it work, you finally get it to work, you publish it, it takes off - enthusiasm gets the better of you. Maybe in the rush some mistakes are made. That doesn't mean you have to just drop it and run. None of my stuff would make it past 0.1 if I stopped at the first big mistake :)

    Aside from said being in the zone coding, I usually regret actually responding to these sort of things the day after, which has made me hesitant to reply. Surprise me.
    76
    Thread temporarily closed so everyone sees this.

    The flood of "SafetyNet isn't working for me either!" posts are not helpful, at all. Please refrain from posting further, it will be looked into. Please do not forget that not passing SafetyNet is 100% NORMAL AND INTENDED when you have an unlocked booloader or running custom firmware. These are workarounds and they will be worked around in turn.

    The Flash
    Forum Moderator

    EDIT: Thread is reopened... I will be cleaning any SafetyNet posts for a while to keep the thread clean for real issues.
    75
    Hello everyone!

    I am aware that Google has updated Safety Net that makes Magisk itself a no go for Android Pay. In fact, I witnessed the change live while I am developing the new magiskhide, which should hide all Magisk modules and Magisk installed root.

    Google is serious about Safety Net now, clearly hunting down all possibility to run Xposed with Safety Net passed. I spend quite some time examining the new security measures last midnight, and fortunately it seems that it is possible to run Magisk and root along with Safety Net if no Xposed is running. I'm glad I removed the old root toggle at the right time lol, that is no longer feasible with the latest detection.

    So stay tuned for the next update, it will come with bug fixes, along with the new magiskhide to bypass that Safety Net.

    Google, how will a few systemless mods do any harm :p:p