Magisk General Support / Discussion

Search This thread

pndwal

Senior Member
Hello thank you for your answers pndwal and J.Michael, ok I don't see why and how to reinstall following a third-party installation or other magisk which shows me not available and zygisk not available without going through odin...
Magisk (Magic Mask/root) is always installed in a real device's ramdisk... Thus root (superuser permission) exists regardless of any App...

The Magisk App is NOT Magisk (Mask); it's only a UI or 'dashboard' interface for Magisk...

Your issue is apparently not loss of Magisk/root... Only that the App (dashboard) becomes disconnected... Root still exists...

This issue commonly occurs when you have both the stub (hidden) App and the full (original apk package) App installed at the same time... There should only ever be one or the other...

The 'dashboard' displays/controls fail if you have two instances... (Like a car, installing dual controls requires specialised modifications.)

You have said you have the hidden App while your screenshot proved that the full App was also installed... That's why the App can't see or control Magisk/root status or functions...

If you simply uninstall one or other or both Apps and ensure only one is installed, you will see root/Magisk version in App again... Uninstalling Apps will not affect Magisk (the Magic Mask/root) itself, and you don't need to reflash using Odin etc as only the App (UI/'dashboard') is the issue...

Just uninstall stub or full Apps like any regular App and ensure you only have one App (instance) remaining, then check for Magisk/root...

Don't worry about losing configuration, modules etc as these are not stored in App data unlike regular app configurations... They are stored independently of Magisk App at /data/adb...

... the concern this one how to find magisk if it goes unavailable...
If you think you have lost root, run a terminal emulator app and type magisk -c to see current binary version. If Magisk is not installed, no version info will be returned... To check Magisk is running in the background, type magisk -V to see running daemon version code. If Magisk daemon is not running properly no version info will be returned...

You can check this whether any Magisk App is installed or not.

I hope this helps clarify the difference between Magisk (Magic Mask/root) installation and Magisk App (UI/'dashboard') installation for you...

Bien à vous, PW
 
Last edited:

ipdev

Recognized Contributor
Feb 14, 2016
2,302
1
4,584
Google Nexus 10
Nexus 7 (2013)
@badabing2003 @pndwal @J.Michael

Now that everyone has explained Magisk root vs. the Manager app. 🙃
Sorry.
I will always refer to the Magisk app as the Manager because that is what it is.
I have used Xposed and other(s) for too long to not refer to the application that allows you to setup, install modules, configure and control as the Manager.​

---

I would like to bump the other half of his question. 🙃

Hello, I would like to know the reason when installing an application or updating the fox manager apk or others. Magisk application is found unavailable.

My concern that I would like to know why as explained during an example installation yesterday I installed superNDS a DS nitendo emulator.

- Why would installing/updating a Module cause Magisk to fail for him.
- Why would installing an APK file even affect Magisk let alone cause it to fail.

I can not duplicate this part of the issue.
Any ideas on why this part of the issue would happen? :unsure:

Cheers :cowboy:

PS.
I update and install modules, apks and even system updates with Magisk hidden (renamed).
Very rarely do I have an issue due to the Magisk app being renamed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J.Michael

J.Michael

Recognized Contributor
Jan 20, 2018
1,635
1,798
Samsung Galaxy Tab A series
@badabing2003 @pndwal @J.Michael

Now that everyone has explained Magisk root vs. the Manager app. 🙃
Sorry.​
I will always refer to the Magisk app as the Manager because that is what it is.​
I have used Xposed and other(s) for too long to not refer to the application that allows you to setup, install modules, configure and control as the Manager.​

---

I would like to bump the other half of his question. 🙃





- Why would installing/updating a Module cause Magisk to fail for him.
- Why would installing an APK file even affect Magisk let alone cause it to fail.

I can not duplicate this part of the issue.
Any ideas on why this part of the issue would happen? :unsure:

Cheers :cowboy:

PS.
I update and install modules, apks and even system updates with Magisk hidden (renamed).
Very rarely do I have an issue due to the Magisk app being renamed.
There is no denying that the Android app formerly known as "Magisk Manager" is a manager. The quibbling comes from John Wu declaring that he no longer wanted the app to be called "Magisk Manager", but rather just "Magisk".

As for @meric57's disappearing Magisk: He mentioned installing apps, not so much modules. And we are all currently so hung up on him displaying screenshots showing no-Magisk/unhidden-manager vs. Magisk/hidden-manager, I think we are ignoring his claim that the problem is triggered by installing/updating an app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ipdev

badabing2003

Recognized Contributor
Sep 17, 2012
1,823
2,382
There is no denying that the Android app formerly known as "Magisk Manager" is a manager. The quibbling comes from John Wu declaring that he no longer wanted the app to be called "Magisk Manager", but rather just "Magisk".

As for @meric57's disappearing Magisk: He mentioned installing apps, not so much modules. And we are all currently so hung up on him displaying screenshots showing no-Magisk/unhidden-manager vs. Magisk/hidden-manager, I think we are ignoring his claim that the problem is triggered by installing/updating an app.
@J.Michael and @ipdev
To me the problem of why installing an app is triggering the issue is a secondary problem, that I wouldn't look into until I address the primary issue.
Which is:
1- Multiple versions of the manager on the system.
2- Redoing the root patch (this should not be necessary)

Hence I asked to first uninstall all managers, reboot and the install one copy, preferably not hidden (just for testing) and then install an app and see if it triggers the issue. I suspect that it won't, but if it does, at least at that point we know it is not the manger misleading him.

It is also possible that the Magisk root is of a different version than the manager being installed.
Once change at a time to narrow it down, that would be my approach.
 

ipdev

Recognized Contributor
Feb 14, 2016
2,302
1
4,584
Google Nexus 10
Nexus 7 (2013)
@J.Michael and @ipdev
To me the problem of why installing an app is triggering the issue is a secondary problem, that I wouldn't look into until I address the primary issue.
Which is:
1- Multiple versions of the manager on the system.
2- Redoing the root patch (this should not be necessary)

Hence I asked to first uninstall all managers, reboot and the install one copy, preferably not hidden (just for testing) and then install an app and see if it triggers the issue. I suspect that it won't, but if it does, at least at that point we know it is not the manger misleading him.

It is also possible that the Magisk root is of a different version than the manager being installed.
Once change at a time to narrow it down, that would be my approach.
Competing installed Magisk manager apps would give the error even before installing a random apk file.
Both the full Magisk app and the hidden (renamed) one would show Magisk as N/A.

I do not think the initial issue is with multiple Magisk apps installed.
Since Magisk (hidden) seems to be working before installing an apk file. :unsure:

I can see reflashing magisk via Odin might install the full Magisk app.
But, it does not explain why it (full version) shows Magisk actively installed if there is a hidden magisk Manager app still active.
The full version and the hidden (renamed) version should both show Magisk as N/A until you remove one of them.

---

I fully agree with your suggestion about testing without the Magisk app hidden (renamed). 👍

Cheers. :cowboy:


PS.
Just tried to duplicate competing full and hidden Magisk app on my Pixel 7.
Current commits in Magisk seem to now keep this from happening.
I installed the full Magisk app version.
Opened it and it closed and was removed, leaving only my hidden (renamed) version active.🤪
 

J.Michael

Recognized Contributor
Jan 20, 2018
1,635
1,798
Samsung Galaxy Tab A series
Competing installed Magisk manager apps would give the error even before installing a random apk file.
Both the full Magisk app and the hidden (renamed) one would show Magisk as N/A.

I do not think the initial issue is with multiple Magisk apps installed.
Since Magisk (hidden) seems to be working before installing an apk file. :unsure:

I can see reflashing magisk via Odin might install the full Magisk app.
But, it does not explain why it (full version) shows Magisk actively installed if there is a hidden magisk Manager app still active.
The full version and the hidden (renamed) version should both show Magisk as N/A until you remove one of them.

---

I fully agree with your suggestion about testing without the Magisk app hidden (renamed). 👍

Cheers. :cowboy:


PS.
Just tried to duplicate competing full and hidden Magisk app on my Pixel 7.
Current commits in Magisk seem to now keep this from happening.
I installed the full Magisk app version.
Opened it and it closed and was removed, leaving only my hidden (renamed) version active.🤪
@meric57's screenshots show no Magisk with unhidden manager; Magisk with hidden manager

I don't remember anyone ever talking about locating the hidden app in the app drawer and using it. I have been assuming that it would show Magisk installed -- the problem was always that the victim didn't realize he had two manager apps, I don't remember anyone saying that with two managers, both managers are disabled, only that the new, unhidden, manager did not communicate with the installed Magisk because the installed Magisk had somehow been co-opted by the manager that is now hidden.

Maybe meaningless details. I do not feel that we have been told what @meric57 did, in exactly what order.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ipdev and pndwal

pndwal

Senior Member
@badabing2003 @pndwal @J.Michael

Now that everyone has explained Magisk root vs. the Manager app. 🙃
Sorry.​
I will always refer to the Magisk app as the Manager because that is what it is.​
I have used Xposed and other(s) for too long to not refer to the application that allows you to setup, install modules, configure and control as the Manager.​
I think John did this:
https://topjohnwu.github.io/Magisk/...agisk-manager-is-deadlong-live-the-magisk-app
to clearly distinguish the old Manager which was just that, the Manager component, a "companion app" finishing with version 8.0.7, from the new Magisk app which is actually a complete Magisk package w/ the App (UI) part now necessarily in sync with the Magisk binaries and including "everything it needs within the APK itself, making installation a 100% offline process" incl. zip installers and now stub APK etc and starting wrapped with Magisk itself as version 22.0 (22000)...

Magisk Manager is dead.
Long live the Magisk app!


😋 PW
 

pndwal

Senior Member
PS.
I update and install modules, apks and even system updates with Magisk hidden (renamed).
Very rarely do I have an issue due to the Magisk app being renamed.
This may be device or version dependant... I always try this just to guage if the issue has been resolved... On my device the issue is less frequent than a year ago, but both taking Hide the Magisk app and updating with App hidden have still failed several times recently to remove the full App and required manual removal...

Here's an open issue on this; My comments there too:
Hiding and Restoring Magisk App not working properly on Galaxy A8 2018 (Android 9.0)
#6309 opened on Oct 6, 2022 by DarkKnight1995

🤠 PW
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ipdev

pndwal

Senior Member
I would like to bump the other half of his question. 🙃

- Why would installing/updating a Module cause Magisk to fail for him.
- Why would installing an APK file even affect Magisk let alone cause it to fail.

I can not duplicate this part of the issue.
Any ideas on why this part of the issue would happen? :unsure:
I did wonder about this too, but am not familiar with how Fox updates / other apps etc might interfere or even restore full app...

However the fact is the member said he had hidden app but first screenshot showed full app was used when Magisk Installed = Non disponible (N/A)...
https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/magisk-general-support-discussion.3432382/post-88094125

After his flashing efforts the hidden app is shown working, so the difference is evidently the simple removal (however it occurred) of the full app and thus the conflict...

As @badabing2003 said:
To me the problem of why installing an app is triggering the issue is a secondary problem, that I wouldn't look into until I address the primary issue.
Which is:
1- Multiple versions of the manager on the system.
...
Once change at a time to narrow it down, that would be my approach.

Competing installed Magisk manager apps would give the error even before installing a random apk file.
Both the full Magisk app and the hidden (renamed) one would show Magisk as N/A.
Yes, but that is evidently the state of things now for whatever reason... And FWIW, once the hidden stub is properly working the full App has necessarily been removed... In my experience it can't just re-appear (it's a different app from stub after all) unless some app or routine is called by the user... [Edit: Actually, I recall now that Magisk could restore full app in stub (?) some time ago ... see post below] The issue may be "how did it get there", but it seems something (lost in translation) was executed purposefully if not inadvisably, and the fix is simple...
I do not think the initial issue is with multiple Magisk apps installed.
Since Magisk (hidden) seems to be working before installing an apk file. :unsure:
So why did he show the full app not working? 🤔
I can see reflashing magisk via Odin might install the full Magisk app.
But, it does not explain why it (full version) shows Magisk actively installed if there is a hidden magisk Manager app still active.
Ah... But it didn't... Full App showed Non disponible ... Excusez mon français...
PS.
Just tried to duplicate competing full and hidden Magisk app on my Pixel 7.
Current commits in Magisk seem to now keep this from happening.
I installed the full Magisk app version.
Opened it and it closed and was removed, leaving only my hidden (renamed) version active.🤪
Please say which commit... (This: Fix automatic stub installation seems unrelated)...

🙂 PW
 
Last edited:

meric57

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2017
287
56
Oeutrange
Samsung Galaxy Tab E
Hello, my installation I do as explained by JohnWu modify AP with magisk then adb pull then odin.
Then once active start zygisk and installation of the main modules, applications like root checker and others give me active root.
Why for example when I update LSPosed in magisk or an application like Saturday that I installed nitendo DS emulator, when I restart my s10 exynos I find in the first magisk and zigisk not available.
So either it comes from a conflict with magisk installer or magisk is jealous that I install another application with its permission.
if it starts again how to proceed for the reinstallation without going through odin normally I just update firmware when a new security arrives, I read on the thread of the discussions you have to flash the boot.img or recovery.img of the AP patched_magisk with adb or magisk in recovery.

Canyie talks about uninstalling app manager no, for automatic installation
https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/pull/6547

Badading2003 talks about 2 install managers, he talks about magisk and app magisk manager .
unless it speaks that on the internal memory of the Samsung S 10 I have 2 installations of the magisk manager app.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ipdev and J.Michael

pndwal

Senior Member
Hello, my installation I do as explained by JohnWu modify AP with magisk then adb pull then odin.
Then once active start zygisk and installation of the main modules, applications like root checker and others give me active root.
Why for example when I update LSPosed in magisk or an application like Saturday that I installed nitendo DS emulator, when I restart my s10 exynos I find in the first magisk and zigisk not available.
So either it comes from a conflict with magisk installer or magisk is jealous that I install another application with its permission.
if it starts again how to proceed for the reinstallation without going through odin normally I just update firmware when a new security arrives, I read on the thread of the discussions you have to flash the boot.img or recovery.img of the AP patched_magisk with adb or magisk in recovery.

Canyie talks about uninstalling app manager no, for automatic installation
https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/pull/6547

Badading2003 talks about 2 install managers, he talks about magisk and app magisk manager .
unless it speaks that on the internal memory of the Samsung S 10 I have 2 installations of the magisk manager app.
Ah... So appearance of full app happens with a reboot...

Could be to do with the broken function (Fix automatic stub installation) the Pull Request you linked is supposed to fix... Not sure...

I just deleted my Magisk App to see if it's restored on reboot (issue comments says it works without Zygisk so I disabled Zygisk to test) and sure enough I get stub installed named "Magisk" on reboot!... However it won't open nor does it ask for additional setup, so can't test further...

It could be that Magisk checks aren't recognising the hidden stub App on your device and Magisk is also installing another stub with full Magisk (I seem to recall this working this way a long while ago) on reboot which then conflicts with existing hidden stub App...

If this continues to occur, I'd try what's been suggested; uninstall every Magisk app (hidden, not hidden), then install full app from GitHub matching Magisk build you have installed again (without rebooting), then take Hide the Magisk app and reboot to see if all is the same and working (ie working hidden stub App still)... If full Magisk appears again after this, please let us know! 🙃 PW
 

pndwal

Senior Member
PS.
Just tried to duplicate competing full and hidden Magisk app on my Pixel 7.
Current commits in Magisk seem to now keep this from happening.
I installed the full Magisk app version.
Opened it and it closed and was removed, leaving only my hidden (renamed) version active.🤪
Just did the same to ensure forced app removal occurs even with same build App installation... It did...

So seems we do have forced app removal for App when hidden stub App is present in addition to when signing keys differ or App has a lower version than Magisk daemon...

Man, Magisk Devs are trying hard to protect us from ourselves! (Not sure I need my hand held this much)... Except that when this fails to work as expected we may need protecting from them! 😶😲🙃 PW
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ipdev and HippoMan

pndwal

Senior Member
Just did the same to ensure forced app removal occurs even with same build App installation... It did...

So seems we do have forced app removal for App when hidden stub App is present in addition to when signing keys differ or App has a lower version than Magisk daemon...

Man, Magisk Devs are trying hard to protect us from ourselves! (Not sure I need my hand held this much)... Except that when this fails to work as expected we may need protecting from them! 😶😲🙃 PW
... But regarding this:
PS.
I update and install modules, apks and even system updates with Magisk hidden (renamed).
Very rarely do I have an issue due to the Magisk app being renamed.
This may be device or version dependant... I always try this just to guage if the issue has been resolved... On my device the issue is less frequent than a year ago, but both taking Hide the Magisk app and updating with App hidden have still failed several times recently to remove the full App and required manual removal...

Here's an open issue on this; My comments there too:
Hiding and Restoring Magisk App not working properly on Galaxy A8 2018 (Android 9.0)
#6309 opened on Oct 6, 2022 by DarkKnight1995

🤠 PW
Just uninstalled hidden App (on latest Canary) again, reinstalled Canary Magisk App, then took Hide the Magisk app, and once again process failed to uninstall full app, asks for superuser permission for Magisk App etc ... As usual, simply ignoring requests and uninstalling the full App restores hidden app functions...
IMG_20230207_010336.jpg


😬 PW
 
  • Like
Reactions: ipdev

J.Michael

Recognized Contributor
Jan 20, 2018
1,635
1,798
Samsung Galaxy Tab A series
Hello, my installation I do as explained by JohnWu modify AP with magisk then adb pull then odin.
Then once active start zygisk and installation of the main modules, applications like root checker and others give me active root.
Why for example when I update LSPosed in magisk or an application like Saturday that I installed nitendo DS emulator, when I restart my s10 exynos I find in the first magisk and zigisk not available.
So either it comes from a conflict with magisk installer or magisk is jealous that I install another application with its permission.
if it starts again how to proceed for the reinstallation without going through odin normally I just update firmware when a new security arrives, I read on the thread of the discussions you have to flash the boot.img or recovery.img of the AP patched_magisk with adb or magisk in recovery.

Canyie talks about uninstalling app manager no, for automatic installation
https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/pull/6547

Badading2003 talks about 2 install managers, he talks about magisk and app magisk manager .
unless it speaks that on the internal memory of the Samsung S 10 I have 2 installations of the magisk manager app.
What did you do?

  1. install Magisk APK
  2. find boot image
  3. patch boot image
  4. use Odin to install patched boot image
  5. allow Android to update
  6. find new boot image
When did you make the screenshot showing Magisk: No, Package: com.topjohnwu.magisk?

When did you make the screenshot showing Magisk: Yes, Package: gibberish?

When you update Android, do you look for a new boot image? Do you
patch the new boot image? Do you install the new patched new boot image?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ipdev

ipdev

Recognized Contributor
Feb 14, 2016
2,302
1
4,584
Google Nexus 10
Nexus 7 (2013)
@meric57's screenshots show no Magisk with unhidden manager; Magisk with hidden manager

I don't remember anyone ever talking about locating the hidden app in the app drawer and using it. I have been assuming that it would show Magisk installed -- the problem was always that the victim didn't realize he had two manager apps, I don't remember anyone saying that with two managers, both managers are disabled, only that the new, unhidden, manager did not communicate with the installed Magisk because the installed Magisk had somehow been co-opted by the manager that is now hidden.

Maybe meaningless details. I do not feel that we have been told what @meric57 did, in exactly what order.
As for competing managers.
I was going off of memory from when it used to happen to me every now and then.

Both the regular (not hidden) and hidden (renamed) would show Magisk N/A.

All I had to do was uninstall one of them.
Normally I uninstalled the hidden (renamed) one and rebooted.
Then the regular (not hidden) one would show Magisk installed again. Then I could hide (rename) the manager again.
It was hit or miss if I uninstalled the regular one and rebooted.
Sometimes the hidden one would still show N/A. If so, then I had to uninstall it and reinstall the regular version again.
Then hide (rename) the manager again.


---

I wasted a bit of time tonight trying to get two Magisk manager apps to run currently.
The best I got was an error with Magisk Stable v25.1 on my Pixel 4a.
The initial hiding gave me issues with setting permissions and such.
Once the hidden app was installed, the regular version was removed.
The hidden version showed Magisk installed and active but, would keep throwing errors telling me to restore the Magisk app and hide again.
So I did and no issues the second time around.​

Cheers. :cowboy:

Edit:
@pndwal I did not read your last couple of posts before testing.
When I have time (tomarrow) I will see if I can duplicate it. 🙃
 
Last edited:

ipdev

Recognized Contributor
Feb 14, 2016
2,302
1
4,584
Google Nexus 10
Nexus 7 (2013)
I think John did this:
https://topjohnwu.github.io/Magisk/...agisk-manager-is-deadlong-live-the-magisk-app
to clearly distinguish the old Manager which was just that, the Manager component, a "companion app" finishing with version 8.0.7, from the new Magisk app which is actually a complete Magisk package w/ the App (UI) part now necessarily in sync with the Magisk binaries and including "everything it needs within the APK itself, making installation a 100% offline process" incl. zip installers and now stub APK etc and starting wrapped with Magisk itself as version 22.0 (22000)...

Magisk Manager is dead.
Long live the Magisk app!


😋 PW
Like I said I have been using Manger apps way too long to not refer to them as the Manager. 🙃
Instructions
You can install/update phh's SuperUser in Magisk Manager's Download section
If you have no root in the first place, please flash the zip in the attachment through custom recovery
A root solution is part of a proper Magisk installation.
After phh's SuperUser is installed, please install the SuperUser manager Application through the Play Store
phh's SuperUser Manager
Guess I am turning into the "Old Man".
Next I will be yelling at kids to keep of my lawn. 🤪


Cheers. :cowboy:
 

Telperion

Senior Member
Feb 20, 2011
686
358
It's been a long, long time since I've paid attention to how rooting works on a technical level with modern devices.

I have an Android 10 head unit that I'm trying to get a working userspace root solution onto. The bootloader is locked, but I have root via both a wireless ADB shell as well as serial console. I have read/write access to /system. I don't have the ability to unlock the bootloader and flash a patched boot image. Is it possible to get Magisk working?
 

Top Liked Posts

  • 2
    However, still nothing of this would explain my first problem back here:

    My answer has not changed :)
    Inspect the boot file you generated and see how it differs from the expected patched boot file.

    incomplete boot image downloaded
    This should be a clue.
    2
    Is there anyway to tell if an app is checking for strong integrity? I have 2 apps that stopped working after having to update them and it's because they detect root, but I would like to know if it's strong integrity so I can just give up. The apps names are Absher and Nafath.
    Did you get any answer? Absher, Nafath & SNB (Bank) all not working now
    Check app prerequisites and see if it can run with Android 7 or earlier... If it can they're not enforcing strongIntegrity...

    Test if app can run on any unmodded (stock, locked) device launched with Android 7 or earlier (can be running later stock Android) or any later device known to have broken keymaster implementation (eg. many OnePlus devices)... If it can they're not enforcing strongIntegrity...

    Nb. It is conceivable that an app requiring strongIntegrity might not check for this on certain (whitelisted) devices. However if this behaviour did exist the App would really be compromising the strongIntegrity attestation itself since there should be no way to bypass a failing verdict... Implementing such behaviour would allow any device to bypass the verdict simply by spoofing the device properties of any whitelisted device, rendering strongIntegrity really no better than deviceIntegrity...

    👀 PW
    2
    Magisk 25210 is flawed, no mods are enabled or can run. Switch to 25209 or stable. Don't forget to roll back your boot.img too.
    Usnf mod 1.1 was flawed did not kick in soon enough switch to 2.4.0 mod 1.2

    Then try and see if apps still are blocked
    He mentioned Magisk Alpha 25210..Not sure do we have active Alpha users who know the up-to-date situation there, bugs and fixes in the recent Alpha releases, etc
    1
    No haven't seen that one yet, but you could experiment by adding one with Magisk and see if anything respects it. 😛
    I did test on my two Xiaomi phones, MIUI 12.5/A11 and MIUI 13/A12

    None of them had the /etc/nsswitch.conf file, or anything similar

    I created the conf file as zipped and attached (XDA does not allow conf extension attachments) and copied the conf file to:
    /data/adb/modules/hosts/system/etc

    After reboot, the conf file was mounted to /etc (as 'required')

    Initially, the conf file defines:
    hosts: files dns

    Then I tested the opposite (both options are prepared in the same conf file, one must be commented out, the other un-commented):
    hosts: dns files

    and rebooted - but the conf file seems to be ignored, /etc/hosts file has always the precedence over DNS (ads are always blocked for me via the hosts file)

    PS: Maybe if somebody with A13 (latest Pixel update) would like to test😁
    1
    Finally installed Magisk on an ocean (Moto) device with LOS 20.0. With Zygisk active, universal safetynet module, and adding the infamous banking app to deny list, app finally let run instead of complaining "device cannot be trusted, exit".

    But there were big problems, which I describe in 2 separate posts.

    First, trying "fastboot boot magisk_patched.img" did not work at all.
    Fastboot output:
    fastboot FAILED (remote: '') # yes, [B]nothing[/B] inside the simple quotes...
    Bootloader logs:
    incomplete boot image downloaded

    I tried with su in PC console, "--set-active=b" just to be sure (albeit it's always slot b, and it already was), different platform-tools versions... NOTHING.

    Why is this?
    Fastboot temp booting images doesn't work on all devices... Did you try flashing? PW
  • 11
    . . . found a YT video that explains you can download the APK, rename to .zip, and install it as a module. Hopefully that works 😯
    Not only does it work, but if you take a few extra steps, you can make a 100% clean install of ANY Magisk version or fork without PC or TWRP.
    Here's how I do it :-

    - Download Magisk version/fork you want to try
    - Add .zip to the end of the Magisk apk eg: Magisk.apk becomes Magisk.apk.zip
    - Unhide the Magisk app if you have hidden/renamed it
    - Turn on aeroplane mode
    - Delete /data/adb/Magisk folder and /data/adb/magisk.db file
    - In Magisk app, perform Uninstall Magisk - RESTORE IMAGES so you are back on stock boot image
    - Install the new Magisk.apk.zip as a module
    - Change Magisk.apk.zip back to Magisk.apk
    - Uninstall the Magisk app (the apk only NOT Magisk itself)
    - Reboot
    - Install the new Magisk.apk
    - Open it up and check settings and modules and customise to your needs eg: zygisk may need to be re-enabled and deny list reconfigured
    - Reboot again and turn off aeroplane mode

    You will now be on a new clean install of whatever Magisk you are trying. No loss of root or modules and no need to clear data from play services to re-enable wallet (assuming it worked before and you set everything up properly)
    Only thing left to do is grant root to whatever apps need it.
    11
    how/where do you get prior canary builds if you're on the latest?
    Magisk canary builds are available on GitHub.
    You just have to look at the history. 🙃

    Canary builds are hosted in the magisk-files repo.
    magisk-files (Canary commit history) - [GitHub] - Link
    Select the build commit you are looking for.
    Select the apk file and "View File".
    You can then Download or "View raw".
    Since it can not show you the raw file, it will start the download of the file.
    mcanary1.png
    mcanary2.png
    mcanary3.png
    mcanary4.png

    Cheers. :cowboy:
    10
    Latest Canary (+Debug) Magisk:

    Magisk (e5641d5b) (25208)​

    • Fix release builds

    Diffs to v25.2​

    • [General] New magic mount backend. It supports loading modules into system with overlayfs files injected
    • [MagiskPolicy] Fix minor bug in command line argument parsing
    • [Zygisk] Prevent crashing daemon in error
    • [Zygisk] Rewrite zygote code injection with new loader library approach
    • [Zygisk] Release new API version 4
    • [App] Make stub patching 100% offline
    • [App] Support patching init_boot.img for Samsung ODIN firmware
    • [MagiskInit] Support replacing existing *.rc files in overlay.d
    • [MagiskInit] Rewrite sepolicy.rules mounting and loading implementation
    https://github.com/topjohnwu/magisk-files/blob/0e63c640c4b8799609d6cf3bdd4f88b2e8df4c08/notes.md

    👍 PW
    10
    Thread lightly cleaned!

    @S8rooted&tooted and @pndwal

    Greetings to you both. As you have both noticed, I have cleaned this thread of some of your recent comments. I will politely ask you both to please refrain from
    further OT and argumentative comments, and to please conduct yourselves in accordance with XDA Rule #2.3 for member conduct:

    2.3 Flaming / Lack of respect: XDA is about sharing and this does not involve virtual yelling (flaming) or rudeness. Flaming or posting with a lack of respect is unacceptable. Treat new members in the manner in which you would like to have been treated when you were a new member. When dealing with any member, provide them with guidance, advice and instructions when you can, showing them respect and courtesy. Never post in a demanding, argumentative, disrespectful or self-righteous manner.

    If you wish to argue further, then please do so via PM's, or another platform since XDA is not the place for these types of discussions on the public forums. Please be advised, posts which continue to violate the forum rules will be removed with immediate effect, and posiible sanctions applied to your account should things get too far out of hand, which we certainly do not want.
    So please let this be the end of this here and now.

    Thank you for your cooperation, and hope you have a pleasant day.

    Best regards: Badger50
    8
    View attachment 5853939
    @osm0sis now they are going to remove custom recovery support 😂

    It is because Magisk can't work properly on some broken custom recoveries, which mount partitions with wrong devices...
    Found no way to workaround it other than detecting and warning user to reinstall Magisk manually...
  • 1091
    This is the place for general support and discussion regarding "Public Releases", which includes both stable and beta releases.
    All information, including troubleshoot guides and notes, are in the Announcement Thread
    156
    Hello, I haven't given much support on XDA lately. It can be resulted from
    • University started and I have limited free time. In fact, I mostly develop during midnight
    • I live in Taiwan, which has large time zone differences between my European/American contributors/testers, which usually forces me to stay up late at night to discuss/test stuffs.
    • The new version is about to come, I don't want to spend effort on supporting old releases
    The planned update is delayed again and again, to some point I think I'll shed some light about what has been happening lately, also along with some announcements.

    New Forum!
    As you might have already discovered, Magisk got its own subforum on XDA! Many thanks to all the support you gave me, and much more information/features/support is about to come!
    **For developers supporting all the devices that are not using standard Android boot format, feel free to create threads in this section (actually, PLEASE do so) for your favorite devices after v7 is out. As I currently know, Asus devices require signing the boot image before flashing, and is model dependant; Sony devices seems to use ELF kernel that is unpatchable, or some has two ramdisks (inner + outer), both requires different workarounds; LG bootloader locked devices has to manually "BUMP" the boot image after flashing Magisk..... and there may be lots of other crazy boot image formats that haven't come up to my attention yet.
    It is impossible for me to support all these non-standard boot images, and I hope the community can collaborate to make Magisk running across all the devices. Overall, community collaboration is what XDA about :D

    The Pixel Phone
    Some of you might already know this news, that the next Pixel Phone right around the corner seems like it does not have ramdisk in boot image, which pretty much wrecked Magisk in all ways. However, it pretty much doomed root itself too. Kernel modifications is inevitable IMO, so I'll try to migrate my scripts to C programs that could possibly be included into the kernel itself. Note that I'm not familiar with linux kernel, I'm not even sure if my idea and concept is correct or not. But once the device is available, I think developers will find a way to bypass all the difficulties, and I'll do my best to learn things ;)

    Current Progress
    In the past month, I've spent quite some time learning SELinux, so that I can avoid using SuperSU's sepolicy patches. Thanks to the helps and tips from @phhusson and @Chainfire, I finally have a much clearer understanding of how SELinux works. The Magisk core parts (the scripts, boot image patches, new features, more supports) are actually done some time ago. What is causing all the delays is the Magisk Manager.
    To be completely honest, although I can code in Java without much issues, Magisk Manager is actually my first Android application, I had to reach out for assistance, and fortunately awesome developers like @DVDandroid and @digitalhigh contributed a lot, which makes the current Manager awesome.
    After the repo system and module management is mostly done, I was about to do some adjustments and release, but what we really done is decided to add another feature: auto-unroot with per-app settings. I decided to wait for it to be finished, and then do my adjustments. Due to reasons that'll be mentioned later, this feature will likely not be available for the next release (should come in future updates)

    Safety Net Disaster
    Those who are using Magisk for Safety Net bypass purposes must have known that Google recently updated the detection method of my Systemless Xposed. I still have no idea what Safety Net is detecting, so currently I cannot fix it on my side (also because I'm busy working on the next update). However, suhide developed by @Chainfire is able to hide Xposed and worked fine.
    However, only my Systemless Xposed v86.2, which is based on SuperSU's su.d, is supported using that method. v86.2 and v86.5 (latest, Magisk based) have nearly identical binaries, and the only difference is the path where the binaries are stored.
    I'm still not sure what's the real issue for it not being supported, I just hope it is not done intentionally.

    Conclusion
    Due to the fact that my Safety Net bypass is not 100% perfect now, I do not want to spend any more time waiting for auto-unroot to be polished. What I'm doing now is finishing up all the things I'd like to change in Magisk Manager (it has been a while since I last contributed to Manager, my fellow developers are doing all the heavy job), which might take a little more time, after that, packed with tons of information to be announced in Magisk Section, I'll release the long awaited update.

    Hope this lengthy post gives you the idea of the whole situation, and again thanks for all your support!!
    121
    Ah, some Chainfire bashing, I hope it is not too late for me to exercise additional villainy.

    First, let me make clear I have nothing against @topjohnwu, nor against Magisk. Magisk is an interesting project and it certainly displays @topjohnwu ingenuity and persistence. I don't doubt we will see more interesting things from his hands.

    -------------------------

    What has happened here is not all that dark and complicated, from either end. I returned from holidays, and someone pointed me at Magisk. My first thought: interesting!

    Among other things, the thread lists some issues with SuperSU, which in combination with the phrase The developer also requests users to not bug Chainfire with compatibility requests for SuperSU with Magisk from the portal article, raised my left eyebrow by nigh half an inch. The popular systemless xposed mod is apparently now based on it, and apparently it now no longer works with SuperSU, and apparently I'm not supposed to fix that, nor any of the other found issues. I found that a bit weird. So yes, I have told @topjohnwu that I was a bit surprised he was posting about issues with SuperSU without notifying me about them (I can't fix or help fix issues I'm not aware of, after all).

    He's also spreading a modified version of the SuperSU package, which is not all that uncommon, nor necessarily a problem. I have not looked into what he modified, I only ran a few quick tests on one of my devices, and found some commonly used commands run as root to be broken. I have informed him of this as well.

    It appears the tool of choice for Magisk is phh's Superuser, because of some of the mentioned issues with SuperSU. That's fine by itself, but fixing issues in that superuser by incorporating SuperSU's binaries into it is a somewhat questionable practise. After all, SuperSU is a commercial closed-source package that helps pay for my dinner, and superuser is a direct competitor. I have informed him that I was surprised he did this without asking for permission. I have expressed similar surprise on him spreading a modified version of LiveBoot (which helps pay for a snack now and then).
    @topjohnwu has also stated that Magisk's scripts are largely influenced by mine (I have not checked). Scripts based on mine are used all over the place on XDA, some people have crafted amazing things based on them, I have never made an issue of this (otherwise I would have just made them binaries). But yes, I have also stated to him that I don't think it's very nice to base something on one program, and then using that to (almost exclusively) push something directly competing with that program.

    tl;dr Towards @topjohnwu, I have:
    - expressed surprise he has issues getting Magisk to work with SuperSU, and has chosen not to inform me about those
    - expressed surprise he is using SuperSU binaries in a competing superuser without permission
    - expressed surprise he is posting a modified LiveBoot without permission
    - informed him of issues with the modified SuperSU he has posted
    - let him know I thought it wasn't very nice to be applying my scripts to benefit seemingly exclusively that same competing superuser

    To be crystal clear:
    - I have not asked for an apology
    - I have not asked for Magisk to be abandoned, neither the root hiding nor systemless module parts, and certainly not systemless xposed
    - I have not made an issue of any of this anywhere, until this post
    - I have not even specifically asked for anything to be taken down (though obviously in my opinion the other superuser package mixed with SuperSU's binaries, as well as the LiveBoot package, should go)
    - I have not reported this thread to XDA moderators for copyright violations or otherwise

    While my conversation with @topjohnwu may not win any awards for being friendly (though it may win some for brevity), I think all things considered my response has been rather mild. To be perfectly honest, until the apology post, I thought this was over with already. I think the apology post was triggered because I haven't replied to his last PM for a while - I was in the zone, it happens.

    To emphasize again, I have nothing against @topjohnwu, Magisk, or systemless xposed, and it is certainly not my goal to see any of them go. If it can be made to work together with SuperSU, great.

    I get it though: you think of something, you want to see if you can make it work, you finally get it to work, you publish it, it takes off - enthusiasm gets the better of you. Maybe in the rush some mistakes are made. That doesn't mean you have to just drop it and run. None of my stuff would make it past 0.1 if I stopped at the first big mistake :)

    Aside from said being in the zone coding, I usually regret actually responding to these sort of things the day after, which has made me hesitant to reply. Surprise me.
    76
    Thread temporarily closed so everyone sees this.

    The flood of "SafetyNet isn't working for me either!" posts are not helpful, at all. Please refrain from posting further, it will be looked into. Please do not forget that not passing SafetyNet is 100% NORMAL AND INTENDED when you have an unlocked booloader or running custom firmware. These are workarounds and they will be worked around in turn.

    The Flash
    Forum Moderator

    EDIT: Thread is reopened... I will be cleaning any SafetyNet posts for a while to keep the thread clean for real issues.
    75
    Hello everyone!

    I am aware that Google has updated Safety Net that makes Magisk itself a no go for Android Pay. In fact, I witnessed the change live while I am developing the new magiskhide, which should hide all Magisk modules and Magisk installed root.

    Google is serious about Safety Net now, clearly hunting down all possibility to run Xposed with Safety Net passed. I spend quite some time examining the new security measures last midnight, and fortunately it seems that it is possible to run Magisk and root along with Safety Net if no Xposed is running. I'm glad I removed the old root toggle at the right time lol, that is no longer feasible with the latest detection.

    So stay tuned for the next update, it will come with bug fixes, along with the new magiskhide to bypass that Safety Net.

    Google, how will a few systemless mods do any harm :p:p