Magisk General Support / Discussion

Search This thread

matth76

Member
Sep 26, 2016
23
2
47
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Finally it works,
I installed again 21.2 from a .zip i had and the menu and all settings are back (i had nothing after the doanlod path option in the settings)
updated to 21.4 and it's ok

Thanks for help :)
 

regularmen

Member
Feb 7, 2018
23
2
hello, I have an odd issue in my Nokia 5 running Magisk 21.4 .

Everything is fine and working, I have added some module to suit my needs, no problem.
Then, some times later, every apps would cease to open at all. it would stuck at the apps splash screen and never goes beyond it. at this point I can't do anything, I can't open magisk manager or even the android settings. what's weird is that its still responding well, not like it hangs or lags or something. I can swipe down status bar and turn some stuff, I can still reboot the phone normally and this is the only thing I can do at that point. to fix this all I need is just to reboot, but it would happen again later. I wondered what's going on? also this has happened way back since magisk 18.0. and thanks for the help!
 

nowster

Senior Member
Dec 30, 2012
425
136
hello, I have an odd issue in my Nokia 5 running Magisk 21.4 .

Everything is fine and working, I have added some module to suit my needs, no problem.
Then, some times later, every apps would cease to open at all. ...
I think this is related to the f2fs problem. I've had this a few times with my Pixel 3a.
 

CSX321

Senior Member
Aug 21, 2009
644
300
Southern IL USA
I think this is related to the f2fs problem. I've had this a few times with my Pixel 3a.
Me, too, with my Pixel 3. I wonder is this something we can expect to be fixed in a future Android update, or are we going to have to fix it ourselves with a patched or custom kernel? I hate that my phone feels unstable now, after years of being rock solid with A10 and Magisk.
Edit...I just installed the ElementalX kernel. Seems stable so far with systemless hosts enabled. I used to use it with my old Nexus 5, but this is the first time I've used it with the Pixel 3.
 
Last edited:

uvzen

Senior Member
Feb 28, 2020
100
63
Huawei P8
Huawei P10
My device:
Name: Huawei P10
Model: VTR-L29
Build: 8.0.0.386(C432)

I have unlocked bootloader and root magisk in version 20.4. When I want to update magisk to higher version 21.x, then I lose root. I tried update in magisk manager app or flash update magisk in TWRP and neither of these methods work. What is wrong?
 

oollee

New member
Jan 21, 2021
2
0
Hey folks,
I am not able to root the Sony Xperia Z3 Compact (z3c) running LineageOS17.1.

## How I recognized the problem:
- The Card "Magisk" in MagiskManager is showing the following:
- A/B: No
- Installed: n/a <---------
- SAR: Yes
- Ramdisk: Yes
- Crypto: n/a
- MagiskManager has no bottom menu

## How I flashed Magisk (also tried flashing multiple times)
- Lineage Recovery 17.1-20210117 > Apply Update
- sideloading fails: "serving: 'Magisk-v21.1.zip' (~47%) adb: failed to read command: Success"
- TWRP 3.0.2 > ADB Sideload
- sideloading succeeds
- fastboot flash boot patched_boot.img
- fastboot fails: "fastboot: error: Couldn’t parse partition size ‘0x’"
- fastboot flash:raw boot patched_boot.img
- fastboot succeeds

Is there a way to flash Magisk with debugging output or even install Magisk by hand?
 

iamrance.asa

Senior Member
Hey folks,
I am not able to root the Sony Xperia Z3 Compact (z3c) running LineageOS17.1.

## How I recognized the problem:
- The Card "Magisk" in MagiskManager is showing the following:
- A/B: No
- Installed: n/a <---------
- SAR: Yes
- Ramdisk: Yes
- Crypto: n/a
- MagiskManager has no bottom menu

## How I flashed Magisk (also tried flashing multiple times)
- Lineage Recovery 17.1-20210117 > Apply Update
- sideloading fails: "serving: 'Magisk-v21.1.zip' (~47%) adb: failed to read command: Success"
- TWRP 3.0.2 > ADB Sideload
- sideloading succeeds
- fastboot flash boot patched_boot.img
- fastboot fails: "fastboot: error: Couldn’t parse partition size ‘0x’"
- fastboot flash:raw boot patched_boot.img
- fastboot succeeds

Is there a way to flash Magisk with debugging output or even install Magisk by hand?
Have you tried flashing the zip via twrp or other recovery? It seems like when you try to flash it, it's trying to flash a broken img.
 

FourSilver

Member
Jan 11, 2021
28
4
re: EDL tool: I think he was saying that ADB or fastboot has some option to "boot" into Emergency Download Mode. As someone else mentioned, this might be one of those cases where you have to hold a dead chicken in one hand while connecting a powered down phone to the USB cable already connected to a PC running ADB (or fastboot). If you can find the right ritual, it's probably less frustrating than the "hold three buttons until precisely half-a-second *before* a certain message shows on the screen, at which point switch to four other buttons".
It seems an even less frustrating approach would be to use the SP Flash Tool's Download feature to restore the device to the factory configuration.:)
 

FourSilver

Member
Jan 11, 2021
28
4
No. Any older version of the Manager will still use the same update channel as a new version, so it makes no difference. To downgrade Magisk using the Manager you'll have to use a custom update channel (or flash the zip manually as you would a module zip, I'd forgotten about this possibility), and then it doesn't really matter what version of the Manager you use (unless we're talking very old releases of Magisk or Manager).
This is a really interesting approach. Last weekend, @a-dead-trousers posted information on the forum about a TWRP release for the Atom XL. I wonder if I could use that to flash a zipped version of Magisk that apparently worked (i.e. prior to v8.0.0) for the device.

Is this still considered a "downgrade", since installing TWRP requires installation of a non-stock ROM? (According to the install docs for the TWRP release, "booting into stock ROM will replace TWRP with the stock recovery.")
 
Last edited:

x.trinity

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
637
151
Europe
Ive tried A11 but Magisk is not working as it supposed to ..Back to A10 and it works properly.
Ive checked Installation guide from Magisk GitHub, but its confused..its not possible to install Magisk through Magisk Manager anymore, nor flashing magisk.zip from recovery?
 

regularmen

Member
Feb 7, 2018
23
2
I think this is related to the f2fs problem. I've had this a few times with my Pixel 3a.
Me, too, with my Pixel 3. I wonder is this something we can expect to be fixed in a future Android update, or are we going to have to fix it ourselves with a patched or custom kernel? I hate that my phone feels unstable now, after years of being rock solid with A10 and Magisk.
Edit...I just installed the ElementalX kernel. Seems stable so far with systemless hosts enabled. I used to use it with my old Nexus 5, but this is the first time I've used it with the Pixel 3.

Hi, thanks for the response, at least I'm getting somewhere.

So what can we do about this issue. Several google searches shows dead end and it seems a recurring issue to some hardware.
 

pndwal

Senior Member
This is a really interesting approach. Last weekend, @a-dead-trousers posted information on the forum about a TWRP release for the Atom XL. I wonder if I could use that to flash the a zipped version of Magisk that apparently worked (i.e. prior to v8.0.0) for the device.

Is this still considered a "downgrade", since installing TWRP requires installation of a non-stock ROM? (According to the install docs for the TWRP release, "booting into stock ROM will replace TWRP with the stock recovery.")
Yes, flashing w/ custom recovery achieves the same thing if it works / can be done, so it will be a downgrade if using earlier version.

There are also usually ways to make a custom recovery stick w/ stock rom. Often simply booting immediately to recovery after install does this, or simlply having Magisk root installed, but but it may be more difficult for some devices.

Of course, you can keep stock recovery and still boot / use custom recovery from PC using Fastboot (fastboot boot recovery.img). PW
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: J.Michael

pndwal

Senior Member
It seems an even less frustrating approach would be to use the SP Flash Tool's Download feature to restore the device to the factory configuration.:)
QCom Emergency Download mode and MTKs similar 'Emergency' mode is generally for when bootloader is corrupt / Fastboot function is broken. I think he suggested this as an alternative option because you indicated you couldn't use Fastboot initially. PW
 
Last edited:

Didgeridoohan

Retired Senior Moderator
May 31, 2012
12,300
1
14,850
Gone
Google Nexus 4
Nexus 6
This is a really interesting approach. Last weekend, @a-dead-trousers posted information on the forum about a TWRP release for the Atom XL. I wonder if I could use that to flash the a zipped version of Magisk that apparently worked (i.e. prior to v8.0.0) for the device.

Is this still considered a "downgrade", since installing TWRP requires installation of a non-stock ROM? (According to the install docs for the TWRP release, "booting into stock ROM will replace TWRP with the stock recovery.")
Yes, flashing w/ custom recovery achieves the same thing if it works / can be done, so it will be a downgrade if using earlier version.

There are also usually ways to make a custom recovery stick w/ stock rom. Often simply booting immediately to recovery after install does this, or simlply having Magisk root installed, but but it may be more difficult for some devices.

Of course, you can keep stock recovery and still boot / use custom recovery from PC using Fastboot (fastboot boot recovery.img). PW

Just to be clear (since I was a little unclear when I said "flash the zip manually as you would a module zip"), what I meant was that you can take a Magisk zip and install it from the modules section of the Manager (as long as you're already rooted). I haven't tried that in a while though (actually forgot about it), but it has worked perfectly in the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dcarvil and pndwal

BHUSHAN7988

Senior Member
Oct 1, 2013
218
52
28
dharwad
Google Pixel 6a
Myjio app still does not work for me. Safety net passes every time for me.
Op6t
Stock oos
Have edxposed white list mode

Any solution?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210122-235246.jpg
    Screenshot_20210122-235246.jpg
    255.1 KB · Views: 27
  • Screenshot_20210122-235231.jpg
    Screenshot_20210122-235231.jpg
    134.9 KB · Views: 26

Top Liked Posts

  • 1
    So try a ROM at least as recent as the newest ROM you've ever installed, but with the right CSC code. After your phone is usable as a phone you can think about re-installing Magisk.
    Didn't work out. Odin just stopped right before passing stage. I rebooted the phone manualy, baseband is still unknown as long as EMEI.
    1
    Unfortunately, multi-user mode did not help. Deleting files from a folder adb Neither. I guess the only thing left is wipe data
    Mmm. Not sure that will help either... You can open a GitHub issue if you're prepared to install Debug Magisk build and supply logs; Devs might help further. 🙃 PW
    1
    Is EMEI IMEI in another language?

    Please explain "as long as EMEI".

    I can't keep track of your situation. The ROM IDs you posted a week ago do not make it obvious that your device has anything with version 17 while you are trying to install version 16.

    I do not understand the country codes. Or the CSC, if that is something other than country code.

    Maybe you still aren't trying to install the right ROM. Remember, at this point we don't care what software you wish you had. You are supposed to be finding a ROM that is meant for your device, maybe associated with your carrier, maybe tagged with your location. Possibly complicated by it cannot be older than what is already on your device.

    Can you go to your service provider and tell them you need help? (If you bought the phone from someone other than your service provider, start with the person who sold you the phone.) The service provider should have some interest in helping you -- if you can't use the service, you won't keep paying for it.

    Maybe you can install a custom ROM. Check other threads to see whether something like LineageOS has been installed on the same device, and whether the device then functions as a phone.
    Other saga details:
    https://xdaforums.com/t/sm-g975f-is-this-the-end-of-the-journey-for-my-phone.4663849/#post-89440576

    👀 PW
  • 5
    I'm now having a problem hiding the TJW Magisk 27002 app ...

    I finally was able to resurrect my old Pixel 5. It's running stock A11 and was running TJW Magisk 26004 with no problem.

    The Magisk manager was showing that the upgrade to 27002 was ready for installation, and so I did the following:

    (1) Unhide Magisk
    (2) Update Magisk (27002 was listed)
    (3) After Magisk manager restarted, I did Direct Update to 27002, including reboot
    (4) Magisk 27002 indeed came up properly after reboot.
    (5) Tried to perform Hide The Magisk App.

    I entered the arbitrary name for hiding, and I clicked "OK". But the hiding never took place.

    I rebooted again, to see if perhaps that's necessary, and I repeated the hiding attempt by adding the same arbitrary name, and I again clicked "OK". But the hiding still didn't take place.

    I searched my device, and there is no app nor shortcut with that arbitrary name. I also tried other, different arbitrary names, but after clicking "OK", the hiding still didn't take place for any name I chose.

    What am I missing?
    Known issue. A fix has been merged. You can use the Debug app, revert back to 27001 or wait until 27003 is released.

    EDIT: Ninja'd 🙃
    4
    I'm now having a problem hiding the TJW Magisk 27002 app ...

    I finally was able to resurrect my old Pixel 5. It's running stock A11 and was running TJW Magisk 26004 with no problem.

    The Magisk manager was showing that the upgrade to 27002 was ready for installation, and so I did the following:

    (1) Unhide Magisk
    (2) Update Magisk (27002 was listed)
    (3) After Magisk manager restarted, I did Direct Update to 27002, including reboot
    (4) Magisk 27002 indeed came up properly after reboot.
    (5) Tried to perform Hide The Magisk App.

    I entered the arbitrary name for hiding, and I clicked "OK". But the hiding never took place.

    I rebooted again, to see if perhaps that's necessary, and I repeated the hiding attempt by adding the same arbitrary name, and I again clicked "OK". But the hiding still didn't take place.

    I searched my device, and there is no app nor shortcut with that arbitrary name. I also tried other, different arbitrary names, but after clicking "OK", the hiding still didn't take place for any name I chose.

    What am I missing?
    Known problem with 27002, the debug version doesn't have the problem with hiding, read back to see the discussion about it
    4
    Is the Magisk 27001 APK/zip still available anywhere? I'd like to downgrade, but I can only find 27000 on Github and 27002 via update. I don't want to go to Canary in case the mounting changes break anything, or Debug as I hear the extra logging etc. causes performance issues (correct me if I'm wrong).
    Only v27000 is Stable. (and Beta). v27001 and v27002 are Canary or Debug

    Set your Update Channel to Stable and you will see (just like you can see also on GitHub) that latest Stable is v27000, there was never Stable v27001 or v27002

    Generally, Stable is always Nx100

    So, you cannot downgrade to Stable v27001 but Canary v27001 should be just like Stable v27000 (same codebase). That's also the general policy, whenever Nx100 Stable is released, then immediately comes Canary Nx100 +1, on the same code-base

    Therefore, downgrade to Stable v27000 instead
    4
    Not sure if the fix has been pushed yet but looking at GitHub it's been sorted
    Not pushed yet according to my magisk app.
    Luckily i don't hide or need to hide; this is a sad bug and i hope, for others' sake, it's pushed as soon as the developers can. But that's also why it's canary and not beta or release, it's why (or should be why) we use canary, to squash bugs before the rest experience them.
    4
    Not sure if the fix has been pushed yet but looking at GitHub it's been sorted
    Not pushed yet... Looks like recent Android Gradle plugin upgrade just didn't build properly... Guess a new build may come once Upgrade AGP is reverted but may not happen till AGP upgrade is redone. 🤪 PW
  • 1103
    This is the place for general support and discussion regarding "Public Releases", which includes both stable and beta releases.
    All information, including troubleshoot guides and notes, are in the Announcement Thread
    156
    Hello, I haven't given much support on XDA lately. It can be resulted from
    • University started and I have limited free time. In fact, I mostly develop during midnight
    • I live in Taiwan, which has large time zone differences between my European/American contributors/testers, which usually forces me to stay up late at night to discuss/test stuffs.
    • The new version is about to come, I don't want to spend effort on supporting old releases
    The planned update is delayed again and again, to some point I think I'll shed some light about what has been happening lately, also along with some announcements.

    New Forum!
    As you might have already discovered, Magisk got its own subforum on XDA! Many thanks to all the support you gave me, and much more information/features/support is about to come!
    **For developers supporting all the devices that are not using standard Android boot format, feel free to create threads in this section (actually, PLEASE do so) for your favorite devices after v7 is out. As I currently know, Asus devices require signing the boot image before flashing, and is model dependant; Sony devices seems to use ELF kernel that is unpatchable, or some has two ramdisks (inner + outer), both requires different workarounds; LG bootloader locked devices has to manually "BUMP" the boot image after flashing Magisk..... and there may be lots of other crazy boot image formats that haven't come up to my attention yet.
    It is impossible for me to support all these non-standard boot images, and I hope the community can collaborate to make Magisk running across all the devices. Overall, community collaboration is what XDA about :D

    The Pixel Phone
    Some of you might already know this news, that the next Pixel Phone right around the corner seems like it does not have ramdisk in boot image, which pretty much wrecked Magisk in all ways. However, it pretty much doomed root itself too. Kernel modifications is inevitable IMO, so I'll try to migrate my scripts to C programs that could possibly be included into the kernel itself. Note that I'm not familiar with linux kernel, I'm not even sure if my idea and concept is correct or not. But once the device is available, I think developers will find a way to bypass all the difficulties, and I'll do my best to learn things ;)

    Current Progress
    In the past month, I've spent quite some time learning SELinux, so that I can avoid using SuperSU's sepolicy patches. Thanks to the helps and tips from @phhusson and @Chainfire, I finally have a much clearer understanding of how SELinux works. The Magisk core parts (the scripts, boot image patches, new features, more supports) are actually done some time ago. What is causing all the delays is the Magisk Manager.
    To be completely honest, although I can code in Java without much issues, Magisk Manager is actually my first Android application, I had to reach out for assistance, and fortunately awesome developers like @DVDandroid and @digitalhigh contributed a lot, which makes the current Manager awesome.
    After the repo system and module management is mostly done, I was about to do some adjustments and release, but what we really done is decided to add another feature: auto-unroot with per-app settings. I decided to wait for it to be finished, and then do my adjustments. Due to reasons that'll be mentioned later, this feature will likely not be available for the next release (should come in future updates)

    Safety Net Disaster
    Those who are using Magisk for Safety Net bypass purposes must have known that Google recently updated the detection method of my Systemless Xposed. I still have no idea what Safety Net is detecting, so currently I cannot fix it on my side (also because I'm busy working on the next update). However, suhide developed by @Chainfire is able to hide Xposed and worked fine.
    However, only my Systemless Xposed v86.2, which is based on SuperSU's su.d, is supported using that method. v86.2 and v86.5 (latest, Magisk based) have nearly identical binaries, and the only difference is the path where the binaries are stored.
    I'm still not sure what's the real issue for it not being supported, I just hope it is not done intentionally.

    Conclusion
    Due to the fact that my Safety Net bypass is not 100% perfect now, I do not want to spend any more time waiting for auto-unroot to be polished. What I'm doing now is finishing up all the things I'd like to change in Magisk Manager (it has been a while since I last contributed to Manager, my fellow developers are doing all the heavy job), which might take a little more time, after that, packed with tons of information to be announced in Magisk Section, I'll release the long awaited update.

    Hope this lengthy post gives you the idea of the whole situation, and again thanks for all your support!!
    121
    Ah, some Chainfire bashing, I hope it is not too late for me to exercise additional villainy.

    First, let me make clear I have nothing against @topjohnwu, nor against Magisk. Magisk is an interesting project and it certainly displays @topjohnwu ingenuity and persistence. I don't doubt we will see more interesting things from his hands.

    -------------------------

    What has happened here is not all that dark and complicated, from either end. I returned from holidays, and someone pointed me at Magisk. My first thought: interesting!

    Among other things, the thread lists some issues with SuperSU, which in combination with the phrase The developer also requests users to not bug Chainfire with compatibility requests for SuperSU with Magisk from the portal article, raised my left eyebrow by nigh half an inch. The popular systemless xposed mod is apparently now based on it, and apparently it now no longer works with SuperSU, and apparently I'm not supposed to fix that, nor any of the other found issues. I found that a bit weird. So yes, I have told @topjohnwu that I was a bit surprised he was posting about issues with SuperSU without notifying me about them (I can't fix or help fix issues I'm not aware of, after all).

    He's also spreading a modified version of the SuperSU package, which is not all that uncommon, nor necessarily a problem. I have not looked into what he modified, I only ran a few quick tests on one of my devices, and found some commonly used commands run as root to be broken. I have informed him of this as well.

    It appears the tool of choice for Magisk is phh's Superuser, because of some of the mentioned issues with SuperSU. That's fine by itself, but fixing issues in that superuser by incorporating SuperSU's binaries into it is a somewhat questionable practise. After all, SuperSU is a commercial closed-source package that helps pay for my dinner, and superuser is a direct competitor. I have informed him that I was surprised he did this without asking for permission. I have expressed similar surprise on him spreading a modified version of LiveBoot (which helps pay for a snack now and then).
    @topjohnwu has also stated that Magisk's scripts are largely influenced by mine (I have not checked). Scripts based on mine are used all over the place on XDA, some people have crafted amazing things based on them, I have never made an issue of this (otherwise I would have just made them binaries). But yes, I have also stated to him that I don't think it's very nice to base something on one program, and then using that to (almost exclusively) push something directly competing with that program.

    tl;dr Towards @topjohnwu, I have:
    - expressed surprise he has issues getting Magisk to work with SuperSU, and has chosen not to inform me about those
    - expressed surprise he is using SuperSU binaries in a competing superuser without permission
    - expressed surprise he is posting a modified LiveBoot without permission
    - informed him of issues with the modified SuperSU he has posted
    - let him know I thought it wasn't very nice to be applying my scripts to benefit seemingly exclusively that same competing superuser

    To be crystal clear:
    - I have not asked for an apology
    - I have not asked for Magisk to be abandoned, neither the root hiding nor systemless module parts, and certainly not systemless xposed
    - I have not made an issue of any of this anywhere, until this post
    - I have not even specifically asked for anything to be taken down (though obviously in my opinion the other superuser package mixed with SuperSU's binaries, as well as the LiveBoot package, should go)
    - I have not reported this thread to XDA moderators for copyright violations or otherwise

    While my conversation with @topjohnwu may not win any awards for being friendly (though it may win some for brevity), I think all things considered my response has been rather mild. To be perfectly honest, until the apology post, I thought this was over with already. I think the apology post was triggered because I haven't replied to his last PM for a while - I was in the zone, it happens.

    To emphasize again, I have nothing against @topjohnwu, Magisk, or systemless xposed, and it is certainly not my goal to see any of them go. If it can be made to work together with SuperSU, great.

    I get it though: you think of something, you want to see if you can make it work, you finally get it to work, you publish it, it takes off - enthusiasm gets the better of you. Maybe in the rush some mistakes are made. That doesn't mean you have to just drop it and run. None of my stuff would make it past 0.1 if I stopped at the first big mistake :)

    Aside from said being in the zone coding, I usually regret actually responding to these sort of things the day after, which has made me hesitant to reply. Surprise me.
    76
    Thread temporarily closed so everyone sees this.

    The flood of "SafetyNet isn't working for me either!" posts are not helpful, at all. Please refrain from posting further, it will be looked into. Please do not forget that not passing SafetyNet is 100% NORMAL AND INTENDED when you have an unlocked booloader or running custom firmware. These are workarounds and they will be worked around in turn.

    The Flash
    Forum Moderator

    EDIT: Thread is reopened... I will be cleaning any SafetyNet posts for a while to keep the thread clean for real issues.
    75
    Hello everyone!

    I am aware that Google has updated Safety Net that makes Magisk itself a no go for Android Pay. In fact, I witnessed the change live while I am developing the new magiskhide, which should hide all Magisk modules and Magisk installed root.

    Google is serious about Safety Net now, clearly hunting down all possibility to run Xposed with Safety Net passed. I spend quite some time examining the new security measures last midnight, and fortunately it seems that it is possible to run Magisk and root along with Safety Net if no Xposed is running. I'm glad I removed the old root toggle at the right time lol, that is no longer feasible with the latest detection.

    So stay tuned for the next update, it will come with bug fixes, along with the new magiskhide to bypass that Safety Net.

    Google, how will a few systemless mods do any harm :p:p