Magisk General Support / Discussion

Search This thread

zgfg

Senior Member
Oct 10, 2016
10,766
9,398
Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T
Xiaomi Mi 11
Thanks! I've now updated, all working fine on RN8T.

Latest @vvb2060 Magisk Alpha build (July 29, 2021) changes (since last GitHub release):​

Chinese Translated:

Magisk (1eb83ad8-alpha-29)​

• Fix the default shell path of busybox

Nb. This build is available only on Telegram at present.
https://t.me/magiskalpha/327

I'll post full Changelog here when available on GitHub.

Last GitHub release, notes, links:
https://xdaforums.com/t/magisk-general-support-discussion.3432382/post-85387865

🤠 PW
Seems there is some 'sowing' problem with 29 - anyone could maybe decipher what would that mean in the Magisk concept?

Anyway, be warned

Google Translation from the Alpha Telegram channel:

🎀:
Sudden sowization

bl Bloodfang:
Indeed, the sow turned ()

🎀:
If there is no problem, push to the update channel

Magisk alpha discussion group:
The above is the problem
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pndwal

jons99

Senior Member
Nov 5, 2019
355
391
Seems there is some 'sowing' problem with 29 - anyone could maybe decipher what would that mean in the Magisk concept?

Anyway, be warned

Google Translation from the Alpha Telegram channel:

🎀:
Sudden sowization

bl Bloodfang:
Indeed, the sow turned ()

🎀:
If there is no problem, push to the update channel

Magisk alpha discussion group:
The above is the problem
30 is out
 
  • Like
Reactions: duttyend and pndwal

pndwal

Senior Member

Latest @vvb2060 Magisk Alpha build (July 29, 2021) changelog:​

Chinese Translated:

alpha update log​

Magisk (1eb83ad8-alpha-30)​

  • Based on 1eb83ad8, please refer to the upstream update log for related modifications
  • Properly process any data from magiskd
  • Support SharedUserId
  • Delete the backup file after restoring the boot image
  • Built-in current version update log
  • Use the local version when the stub cannot be downloaded, now Magisk can be used completely offline
  • Support bootimg v4 format
  • Support bootconfig
  • Detect /data/adb/magisk/ not updated and prompt to repair
  • Remove the disabled and pending deletion marks when upgrading the module, and it is not allowed to mark as pending deletion before restarting
  • Fix that it cannot be flashed in some TWRP
  • Listen to the PACKAGE_FULLY_REMOVED broadcast to remove completely uninstalled apps from magiskhide
  • Show modal waiting pop-up window when hiding/restore Magisk application
  • App adapted to Android 12
  • Android 12+ super user hides the screen overlay when the window pops up
  • For devices supported by the kernel, MagiskSU uses proprietary devpts to bypass some application detection
  • Rewrite MagiskSU's logic to open pty and delete extra sepolicy rules
  • Fix incorrect signal sending in MagiskHide
  • Add untrusted_app_30
  • Prompt that some devices do not load the module sepolicy problem
  • Add mount information to the log file
  • Fix the default shell path of busybox *
  • Support oplus.fstab for oppo series devices
https://github.com/vvb2060/Magisk/b...0d886c64224/app/src/main/res/raw/changelog.md

*Nb. Change since last build on GitHub 1eb83ad8-alpha-27

My earlier notes:
https://xdaforums.com/t/magisk-general-support-discussion.3432382/post-85098469

Current notes:

Check 'earlier notes' for installation method / details.

Alpha build users won't yet see Update button notice in Magisk App for this build as VersionCode has (again) NOT changed from 23001.

I'm not sure if this behaviour will be addressed, but users will observe the 'Latest' and 'Installed' version suffix now differs.

Latest in GitHub magisk_files repo is 1eb83ad8-alpha-30

Latest available from Telegram group is
1eb83ad8-alpha-30

https://xdaforums.com/t/magisk-general-support-discussion.3432382/post-85229385

Nb. In Magisk Documentation, @vvb2060 has updated "Internal Details" and "Deployment" since John did.
https://github.com/vvb2060/Magisk/tree/alpha/docs

🤠 PW
 
Last edited:

pndwal

Senior Member
Seems there is some 'sowing' problem with 29 - anyone could maybe decipher what would that mean in the Magisk concept?

Anyway, be warned

Google Translation from the Alpha Telegram channel:

🎀:
Sudden sowization

bl Bloodfang:
Indeed, the sow turned ()

🎀:
If there is no problem, push to the update channel

Magisk alpha discussion group:
The above is the problem
I think it's just a follow-on comment on "Recently high production 👍" and your comment, which may not have been properly understood.

Still seems to be struggling with this Magisk issue:
https://github.com/topjohnwu/Magisk/issues/3663#issuecomment-888875725
Re '• Support oplus.fstab for oppo series devices' as we speak however...

Said "I tried my best, MTK asked for more blessings" (translated) on Telegram. PW
 

m0han

Senior Member
....I have got a test version thats simplified and removes some of the script duplication
(namely sepolicy) compared to the original, moved to Zacks extended module format,
with correct service and uninstall scripts, and sepolicy.rule. I also added an easy way to
switch between enforcing and permissive.....by default enforcing, need permissive? just
create a blank file named permissive on /sdcard and reboot

I just havent released that yet due to a really unpleasant experience with another member.
Put me back a ways in testing after that shock, so need to test it a bit further.
would be nice to check it out. waiting for it to be ready.
 

pndwal

Senior Member
would be nice to check it out. waiting for it to be ready.
& @73sydney

Also, could someone please explain to me what is the advantage of changing sepolicy for viper? It's still not clear to me.

Also, is Legacy mode still needed with this fix? And can someone say if Legacy mode has any disadvantage?

FWIW, I'm running Viper4Android FX 2.7.2.1 from Magisk repo w/ 2.5.0.4 driver on stock MIUI Android 10.

After installing and setting Legacy mode (Compatibility mode does nothing for me), Driver Status is Abnormal, but driver is always reset properly / working (for Legacy mode) simply by disabling module and rebooting, then enabling and rebooting again (2 reboots).

Hope someone knows! 👍 PW
 
Last edited:

m0han

Senior Member
... could someone please explain to me what is the advantage of changing sepolicy for viper? It's still not clear to me.

Also, is Legacy mode still needed with this fix? And can someone say if Legacy mode has any disadvantage?...
Just sharing my setup: ViPER4Android FX 2.7.1.6 (2716) w/ 2.5.0.4 driver on custom rom AICP 16.1 of 7-july (Android 11).

I don't see the setting for Legacy mode. Driver Status is Normal. Compatibility mode does nothing for me as well. My rom has selinux permissive atm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 73sydney and pndwal

zgfg

Senior Member
Oct 10, 2016
10,766
9,398
Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T
Xiaomi Mi 11
Just sharing my setup: ViPER4Android FX 2.7.1.6 (2716) w/ 2.5.0.4 driver on custom rom AICP 16.1 of 7-july (Android 11).

I don't see the setting for Legacy mode. Driver Status is Normal. Compatibility mode does nothing for me as well. My rom has selinux permissive atm.
@pndwal , @sydney73

I use Viper4AndroidFX 2.7.1.2, the latest available module from Repo, and with simply adding SEPolicy rules to the script, everything works perfect on ny A11 (Status Normal, Processing Yes when playing) without the need for SEKinux Permissive mode.
Only the Legacy mode for Driver must be enabled

The same solution has been posted elswhere (incl. the main V4A FX thread on XDA by some user - IDK was that the origin), here is one my post from another thread with the how-to:
There is actually an easier way to fix Viper4Android, follow the original post where the fix was described:

In other words, replace (use TWRP or root explorer like MiXplorer)
/data/adb/modules/ViPER4AndroidFX/post-fs-data.sh
with the attached file (download and unzip) and reboot

Still make sure that Legacy mode in V4A Settings is enabled

---

In case of installing V4A from scratch:

- install ViPER4Android_FX-v2.7.2.1.zip from Repo (through Magisk) and reboot
- open Viper4Android app and let it install the driver, it will reboot
- replace post-fs-data.sh as above and reboot once again
- open Viper4Android app and enable Legacy mode in its Setrings
- also, don't forget to enable Master limiter for e.g. speaker or headphones

Check the driver status, it must show Status Normal (and Processing Yes when playing nusic)
PS: The same was also discussed in this Magisk thread few months ago, actually there was another user who mentioned that solution here and brought me attention (unfortunately, cannot find his post now)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: m0han

pndwal

Senior Member
@pndwal , @sydney73

I use Viper4AndroidFX 2.7.1.2, latest available module from Repo, and with simply adding SEPolicy rules to the script, everything works perfect, without the need for Permissive mode.
Only theLegacy mode must be selected

The same solution has been posted elswhere (incl. the main V4A FX thread on XDA by some user - IDK was that the origin ), here is one my post from another thread with the how-to:

PS: The same was also duscussed in this Magisk thread few months ago, actually there was another user who mentioned that solution (unfortunately, cannot find his post now)
mmm. But it works out-of-the-box for me after setting Legacy mode, disabling then re-enabling module (2 reboots) as described... 🤔

Seems everyone needs Legacy mode though, but also seems to me no SELinux policy change is needed to reset the driver for this mode...

Has anyone else here tried resetting / fixing just by turning module off, then on again? ... Perhaps I'm missing something. PW
 

zgfg

Senior Member
Oct 10, 2016
10,766
9,398
Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T
Xiaomi Mi 11
mmm. But it works out-of-the-box for me after setting Legacy mode, disabling then re-enabling module (2 reboots) as described... 🤔

Seems everyone needs Legacy mode though, but also seems to me no SELinux policy change is needed to reset the driver for this mode...

Has anyone else here tried resetting / fixing just by turning module off, then on again? ... Perhaps I'm missing something. PW
This way with SEPolicy rules in the script has advantage for me when updating my Xiaomi.eu weekly ROMs:

- Without, I had to go through the procedure with disabling, re-enabling V4A, maybe also AML (it was described in my post I mentioned), then reconfiguring again V4A app (its settings)

- However, upon I added SEPolicy rules section to the script, I can simply install the zip with new ROM, flash its boot.img (prepared in advance) patched by Magisk (flashing one after another in TWRP) , then I reboot and everything (incl. Viper4Android) works out of the box
 
  • Like
Reactions: 73sydney and pndwal

73sydney

Account currently disabled
mmm. But it works out-of-the-box for me after setting Legacy mode, disabling then re-enabling module (2 reboots) as described... 🤔

Seems everyone needs Legacy mode though, but also seems to me no SELinux policy change is needed to reset the driver for this mode...

Has anyone else here tried resetting / fixing just by turning module off, then on again? ... Perhaps I'm missing something. PW

Theres not even legacy mode as an option for the version im using ...theres a compatibiliy mode switch, but thats it

Reason i and a lot of others use the Ichigo Viper zip is because its been the only one to work on A11 for us

Im not up to speed on all things Viper, as ive said before (and perhaps you dont understand my function here, lol) i just tend to repackage other peoples shizz to make it easier to use. Im all ears if theres better ways to do stuff
 

Attachments

  • v4a1.jpg
    v4a1.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 26
  • v4a2.jpg
    v4a2.jpg
    10.6 KB · Views: 26
  • v4a3.jpg
    v4a3.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 26

73sydney

Account currently disabled
This way with SEPolicy rules in the script has advantage for me when updating my Xiaomi.eu weekly ROMs:

- Without, I had to go through the procedure with disabling, re-enabling V4A, maybe also AML (it was described in my post I mentioned), then reconfiguring again V4A app (its settings)

- However, upon I added SEPolicy rules section to the script, I can simply install the zip with new ROM, flash its boot.img (prepared in advance) patched by Magisk (flashing one after another in TWRP) , then I reboot and everything (incl. Viper4Android) works out of the box

Hehe, theres a better explanation of the sepolicy stuff :)
 

zgfg

Senior Member
Oct 10, 2016
10,766
9,398
Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T
Xiaomi Mi 11
Hehe, theres a better explanation of the sepolicy stuff :)
Since I have also A11, you can try that nethod with V4A 2.7.1.2 instead of your older 2.7.1.6

SEPolicy rules I mention do not include SELinux Permissive, just:

allow audioserver audioserver_tmpfs file { read write execute }
allow audioserver system_file file { execmod }
allow mediaserver mediaserver_tmpfs file { read write execute }
allow mediaserver system_file file { execmod }
allow audioserver unlabeled file { read write execute open getattr }
allow hal_audio_default hal_audio_default process { execmem }
allow hal_audio_default hal_audio_default_tmpfs file { execute }
allow hal_audio_default audio_data_file dir { search }
allow app app_data_file file { execute_no_trans }
allow mtk_hal_audio mtk_hal_audio_tmpfs file { execute }

The point (follow-up to my previous post) is that sepolicy.rule file seems to be executed only when module was installed (and therefore overrulled to default when I later update the ROM)

Whereas the same SEPolicy rules commands put to post-fs-data.sh script are executed on each reboot (if Magisk is installed and V4A module enabled) - hence the V4A works again out-of-the-box even upon updating the ROM
 
  • Like
Reactions: pndwal

J.Michael

Recognized Contributor
Jan 20, 2018
2,497
3,050
Samsung Galaxy Tab A series
Seems there is some 'sowing' problem with 29 - anyone could maybe decipher what would that mean in the Magisk concept?

Anyway, be warned

Google Translation from the Alpha Telegram channel:

🎀:
Sudden sowization

bl Bloodfang:
Indeed, the sow turned ()

🎀:
If there is no problem, push to the update channel

Magisk alpha discussion group:
The above is the problem
sow -- female pig that has reproduced?
sow -- plant seeds?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 73sydney

pndwal

Senior Member
Theres not even legacy mode as an option for the version im using ...theres a compatibiliy mode switch, but thats it

Reason i and a lot of others use the Ichigo Viper zip is because its been the only one to work on A11 for us

Im not up to speed on all things Viper, as ive said before (and perhaps you dont understand my function here, lol) i just tend to repackage other peoples shizz to make it easier to use. Im all ears if theres better ways to do stuff
Yup, I'm getting that adding script can save reboots (X2) needed to reset driver on initial installation. 😜 ...

However I had wondered if SELinux changes were actually a necessity on some devices. It seems simple reboots / reset will still do the trick for the less time-conscious users, at least on latest 2.7.2.1 (Magisk repo).

Reason i and a lot of others use the Ichigo Viper zip is because its been the only one to work on A11 for us
I think @zgfg has 2.7.2.1 working on Android MIUI.

Also, I just installed it on my Mi Pad 4, LOS 18.1 (ie. Android 11, Alpha Magisk), and was surprised to find it needed only mandatory reboot after module Installation to work! 😛

I did this: installed Viper4Android FX from Magisk repo but instead of reboot immediately, opened Viper4Android FX App (it's already installed), let it install missing Neon driver then reboot, open Viper4Android FX, check driver status; it's Abnormal, select Legacy mode in settings, check driver status again and it's Normal / working! (No reset needed.)

Not sure if it's Android 11, AOSP standard ROM or other that allows swapping to Legacy mode to work immediately, but my RN8T on stock MIUI, Android 10 & Alpha Magisk needs driver reset incl. reboots to work. PW
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 73sydney

73sydney

Account currently disabled
Since I have also A11, you can try that nethod with V4A 2.7.1.2 instead of your older 2.7.1.6

SEPolicy rules I mention do not include SELinux Permissive, just:

allow audioserver audioserver_tmpfs file { read write execute }
allow audioserver system_file file { execmod }
allow mediaserver mediaserver_tmpfs file { read write execute }
allow mediaserver system_file file { execmod }
allow audioserver unlabeled file { read write execute open getattr }
allow hal_audio_default hal_audio_default process { execmem }
allow hal_audio_default hal_audio_default_tmpfs file { execute }
allow hal_audio_default audio_data_file dir { search }
allow app app_data_file file { execute_no_trans }
allow mtk_hal_audio mtk_hal_audio_tmpfs file { execute }

The point (follow-up to my previous post) is that sepolicy.rule file seems to be executed only when module was installed (and therefore overrulled to default when I later update the ROM)

Whereas the same SEPolicy rules commands put to post-fs-data.sh script are executed on each reboot (if Magisk is installed and V4A module enabled) - hence the V4A works again out-of-the-box even upon updating the ROM


Well now im confused, because the module im working on had as one of its "clean up" goals to remove the duplication of sepolicy.rule AND post-fs-data.sh

Adding to the mix is Johns last changelog for Magisk 23 including:

[General] Several sepolicy.rule copy/installation fixes

I would assume by that it was fucntioning properly to apply any sepolicy.rule files in a modules folder...but maybe not?

So i guess Ichigo was hedging his bets with having both (sepolicy.rule & post-fs-data.sh), but maybe that was trying to account for different magisk versions. Think its safe to say choosing one way would be best going forwards as most should be on 23 at least by now, one would hope. So we think post-fs-data is preferable, from the sound of it...

fwiw, riru-momohider does the same thing - doubles down with sepolicy.rule & post-fs-data....

Maybe i need to reevaluate messing with viper :)
 

73sydney

Account currently disabled
Yup, I'm getting that adding script can save reboots (X2) needed to reset driver on initial installation. 😜 ...

However I had wondered if SELinux changes were actually a necessity on some devices. It seems simple reboots / reset will still do the trick for the less time-conscious users, at least on latest 2.7.2.1 (Magisk repo).


I think @zgfg has 2.7.2.1 working on Android MIUI.

Also, I just installed it on my Mi Pad 4, LOS 18.1 (ie. Android 11, Alpha Magisk), and was surprised to find it needed only mandatory reboot after module Installation to work! 😛

I did this: installed Viper4Android FX from Magisk repo but instead of reboot immediately, opened Viper4Android FX App (it's already installed), let it install missing Neon driver then reboot, open Viper4Android FX, check driver status; it's Abnormal, select Legacy mode in settings, check driver status again and it's Normal / working! (No reset needed.)

Not sure if it's Android 11, AOSP standard ROM or other that allows swapping to Legacy mode to work immediately, but my RN8T on stock MIUI, Android 10 & Alpha Magisk needs driver reset incl. reboots to work. PW

Imma try your method, but last time i tried with the repo version, it did not end well :)

edit:

wont even download the apk lol

Log: line 214: curl not found :)

time for Zacks Cross Compiled Binaries it seems

...still think my ways quicker...jesus....

So, yeah that didnt go so well either - my device couldnt be more connected to the internet btw
ugggh.jpg


So yeah, the repo way is looking super efficent :)

+ echo '- Testing internet connection'
- Testing internet connection
+ /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/curl -Ls --connect-timeout 3 -I https://www.google.com
/data/user/0/ym.uovnvdolycep/cache/flash/update-binary: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/customize.sh: line 4: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/curl: not found
+ /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/busybox- grep -q 'HTTP/.* 200'
/data/user/0/ym.uovnvdolycep/cache/flash/update-binary: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/customize.sh: line 4: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/busybox-: not found
+ /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/busybox- ping -q -c 1 -W 1 google.com
+ /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/busybox- grep -q 'HTTP/.* 200'
/data/user/0/ym.uovnvdolycep/cache/flash/update-binary: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/customize.sh: line 4: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/busybox-: not found
+ /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/curl -Ls --connect-timeout 3 -I https://www.baidu.com
/data/user/0/ym.uovnvdolycep/cache/flash/update-binary: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/customize.sh: line 4: /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/curl: not found
+ /data/adb/modules_update/ccbins/busybox- ping -q -c 1 -W 1 baidu.com
+ return 1

Nope, theres currently no way my device can download the apk through the repo module

I mean i can download any other module i like and have it work, just not that one....

I can download the file from the same path in the browser (path from install script): https://zackptg5.com/downloads/v4afx.apk/v4afx.apk

Saving so much time folks :)

update:

So installed the apk
Opened
Installed driver
Rebooted
Nope...Abnormal
Enabled Legacy...working

Same driver version btw

And then it hit me that the reason i hated the new viper gui was it changed the older easier to use presets, because of course they changed everything to make it harder to use your years old presets and to (try) monetize DDC profiles etc...monetize what was once free...and put analytics in there. Pox on that.

Will be reverting to the Ichigo one thanks
 
Last edited:

zgfg

Senior Member
Oct 10, 2016
10,766
9,398
Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T
Xiaomi Mi 11
Well now im confused, because the module im working on had as one of its "clean up" goals to remove the duplication of sepolicy.rule AND post-fs-data.sh

Adding to the mix is Johns last changelog for Magisk 23 including:

[General] Several sepolicy.rule copy/installation fixes

I would assume by that it was fucntioning properly to apply any sepolicy.rule files in a modules folder...but maybe not?

So i guess Ichigo was hedging his bets with having both (sepolicy.rule & post-fs-data.sh), but maybe that was trying to account for different magisk versions. Think its safe to say choosing one way would be best going forwards as most should be on 23 at least by now, one would hope. So we think post-fs-data is preferable, from the sound of it...

fwiw, riru-momohider does the same thing - doubles down with sepolicy.rule & post-fs-data....

Maybe i need to reevaluate messing with viper :)
According to my post I quoted, I started with that procedure at the times of Magisk 21.6 (?)
It was a game changer for me at that point (simple weekly ROM updates)

If processing of SEPolicy rules changed with v23, I didn't care - I continued with the same simple ROM update procedures and did not play with the V4A sh script anymore

Anyway, I still don't understand why do you insist on the older V4A 2.7.1.6 (time ago I thought that going to an older V4A version would void the need for Legacy mode, but apparently you still need the Legacy driver mode)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 73sydney

pndwal

Senior Member
Maybe (translation) what we called 'rapid fire' (day after day updates).
But then I don't understand where was the 'sow' problem with 29 🤓
Seriously guys and gals, the issue is self evident:

What with so many Alpha sprouts sown (or propagated) from one Magic branch, we need to fork the ground or the sows will mistake the root for breakfast and the problem is xposed. What's more, the solution is burried in the code!

But we have help to decipher it! "Indeed, the sow turned"... Yes! "Sudden sowization"! ...

To crush this a little, the inference has got to be that a sow could easily uproot the problem and reproduce it!... With 29. other. sows... And pigs might fly! ... just like Canaries?!

It's so obvious! "Magisk alpha discussion group:
The above is the problem", even if the problem is above me! 🤪

Really hope nothing is lost in translation. 😜
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: J.Michael

Top Liked Posts

  • 1
    UPDATE: I got it to work by extracting and flashing the stock boot.img and recovery.img via odin. I guess that's a dirty fix and IDK why this worked and flashing the whole stock rom didn't
    If you flashed a stock ROM, you effectively uninstalled Magisk, except for the /data/adb directory.
    Ii'll check that folder (if I can install TWRP or something) in order to clean up, but my goal now is to reroot it.
    Did the flashing of the stock ROM involve doing a "factory reset / wipe data"?
    No, but, I did one factory reset from Android's configuration menu in order to clean up, set up the phone and debloat it (I bought it used). It worked afterwards but I screwed up when debloating so then I did the stock rom flash.
    If you have a problem after trying to reinstall Magisk, the things to check are:
    • did you patch and flash the right file?
    • did you change the version of Magisk?
    • did you change the version of Android?
    I'll keep that in mind when I try to reroot.
    Thanks for your response!
    1
    UPDATE: I got it to work by extracting and flashing the stock boot.img and recovery.img via odin. I guess that's a dirty fix and IDK why this worked and flashing the whole stock rom didn't
    Keep in mind that official instructions still state:

    Important Notes​

    • Never, ever try to restore either boot, init_boot, recovery, or vbmeta partitions back to stock! You can brick your device by doing so, and the only way to recover from this is to do a full Odin restore with data wipe.
    • To upgrade your device with a new firmware, NEVER directly use the stock AP tar file with reasons mentioned above. Always patch AP in the Magisk app and use that instead.
    although I know many Sammy users have been able to recover from this mistake without wiping data... Seems you've put your finger on the working method for your device... Not sure if trick would work for any Samsung device however, but may be useful for others...

    Take care with upgrades in future! 😉

    Ii'll check that folder (if I can install TWRP or something) in order to clean up, but my goal now is to reroot it.
    If goal is to reroot, you can leave configuration as-is... Only modules that become incompatible with later Android versions may cause bootloop, but normally the previous Magisk configuration files are OK... If you want to force a configuration rebuild (restore clean Magisk, no modules, superuser list, DenyList etc) after installation, just delete everything in /data/adb after rooted with a root explorer and reboot; configuration files will then be rebuilt.

    🤠 PW
  • 5
    I'm now having a problem hiding the TJW Magisk 27002 app ...

    I finally was able to resurrect my old Pixel 5. It's running stock A11 and was running TJW Magisk 26004 with no problem.

    The Magisk manager was showing that the upgrade to 27002 was ready for installation, and so I did the following:

    (1) Unhide Magisk
    (2) Update Magisk (27002 was listed)
    (3) After Magisk manager restarted, I did Direct Update to 27002, including reboot
    (4) Magisk 27002 indeed came up properly after reboot.
    (5) Tried to perform Hide The Magisk App.

    I entered the arbitrary name for hiding, and I clicked "OK". But the hiding never took place.

    I rebooted again, to see if perhaps that's necessary, and I repeated the hiding attempt by adding the same arbitrary name, and I again clicked "OK". But the hiding still didn't take place.

    I searched my device, and there is no app nor shortcut with that arbitrary name. I also tried other, different arbitrary names, but after clicking "OK", the hiding still didn't take place for any name I chose.

    What am I missing?
    Known issue. A fix has been merged. You can use the Debug app, revert back to 27001 or wait until 27003 is released.

    EDIT: Ninja'd 🙃
    4
    Is the Magisk 27001 APK/zip still available anywhere? I'd like to downgrade, but I can only find 27000 on Github and 27002 via update. I don't want to go to Canary in case the mounting changes break anything, or Debug as I hear the extra logging etc. causes performance issues (correct me if I'm wrong).
    Only v27000 is Stable. (and Beta). v27001 and v27002 are Canary or Debug

    Set your Update Channel to Stable and you will see (just like you can see also on GitHub) that latest Stable is v27000, there was never Stable v27001 or v27002

    Generally, Stable is always Nx100

    So, you cannot downgrade to Stable v27001 but Canary v27001 should be just like Stable v27000 (same codebase). That's also the general policy, whenever Nx100 Stable is released, then immediately comes Canary Nx100 +1, on the same code-base

    Therefore, downgrade to Stable v27000 instead
    4
    I'm now having a problem hiding the TJW Magisk 27002 app ...

    I finally was able to resurrect my old Pixel 5. It's running stock A11 and was running TJW Magisk 26004 with no problem.

    The Magisk manager was showing that the upgrade to 27002 was ready for installation, and so I did the following:

    (1) Unhide Magisk
    (2) Update Magisk (27002 was listed)
    (3) After Magisk manager restarted, I did Direct Update to 27002, including reboot
    (4) Magisk 27002 indeed came up properly after reboot.
    (5) Tried to perform Hide The Magisk App.

    I entered the arbitrary name for hiding, and I clicked "OK". But the hiding never took place.

    I rebooted again, to see if perhaps that's necessary, and I repeated the hiding attempt by adding the same arbitrary name, and I again clicked "OK". But the hiding still didn't take place.

    I searched my device, and there is no app nor shortcut with that arbitrary name. I also tried other, different arbitrary names, but after clicking "OK", the hiding still didn't take place for any name I chose.

    What am I missing?
    Known problem with 27002, the debug version doesn't have the problem with hiding, read back to see the discussion about it
    4
    Direct Install with recovery mode checked worked for me. You were right.

    After I flashed wrong CSC firmware my baseband and EMEIs disappeared. Now I have updated bootloader and I cant to flash original CSC firmware anymore. Any ideas how to restore baseband, EMEIs or it is too late?
    Yep, I told you several times that you need Recovery mode (selected) for your Ramdisk=No device; instructions for this are also clear in official Installation Instruction page too, but apparently you have not been trying to follow official instructions, so it's no real surprise you've messed up firmware too... Please take *extra* care when modding as there are simply so many variables and pitfalls! 😬

    Are you flashing patched AP (Application Processor binary) along with all the other package binaries (X4?) for your S10+ (also in Magisk Installation page, Samsung section)??

    CP is Cellular Processor (Nb. Oft repeated references to CP as 'core processor' may be misleading) binary package (also referred to as Baseband Modem) so that should have fixed mismatched baseband etc... correct CSC (Consumer Software Customization; region, APN and carrier specific software packages/settings) and even BL (Bootloader) are most likely also important...

    Nb. BL doesn't always update bootloader version, but if later firmware has been flashed be aware that these can also cause anti-roll back version for bootloader to be incremented (in the event that an update patches serious vulns) so you original firmware may be blocked and you may need to use later packages only...

    If flashing latest complete firmware package via Odin doesn't fix your IMEI / baseband issues it may be that you've messed with partitions that contain unique device values in the past... You may need to ask in Galaxy, S10 or S10+ XDA forums for that. 🤠 PW
    3
    Sorry to bother with maybe a stupid question.

    I am using Magisk and root for a long time on my Poco F2 Pro with latest xiaomi.eu ROM and XiamiEUModule App for NFC payment.

    Everything was working fine with Magisk 26.4
    A few days ago I updatet to Magisk 27.0 since then my normal banking app of an Austrian bank gives me a warning, but is still working. No problem witih NFC payment.
    Would be nice to get rid of this warning again, have you any idea how to do so, or how to find out the reason.

    *******************

    On my new phone, Xiaomi 14 Ultra Global Edition FW 1.0.4 I applied for unlocking bootloader, did the unlock yesterday, which caused factory reset.

    I patched init_boot.img after installing Magisk 27.0, enabled Zygisk, hide Magisk, installed PlayIntegrityFix_v15.9.6, Enforced Deny List, Added necessary services to deny list, in Developer Options of Google Play I meet Basic and Device Integrity. Banking App Works, but also the warning about root detected.

    So I flashed FW 1.0.2 via Fastboot with Clean_All Option, made update to 1.0.4 with the updater app (flashing 1.0.4. with fastboot failed, so I made safe bet with flashing 1.0.2. what I have already done successful this morning).
    Then agan the same procedure but with Magisk 26.4, enabled Zygisk, hide Magisk, installed PlayIntegrityFix_v15.9.6, Enforced Deny List, Added necessary services to deny list, in Developer Options of Google Play I meet Basic and Device Integrity. Banking App works without any warning.

    Can you tell me why this behaviour with older Magisk or how to find out?

    **************

    Bonus info- NFC Payment with the app of my bank (not Google Wallet) does not work on Xiami 14 Ultra, but it did also not work as long bootloader was locked. Hoping for xiaomi.eu ROM for Aurora, and working NFC...
    Difference may be related to new "atomic mount" I mentioned above, not sure, but be aware that DenyList is NOT designed for (proper) root hiding... I'd be trying with Shamiko which just hijacks list from DenyList but runs in hidelist mode. Nb. The same Devs responsible for most recent major refactoring in Magisk also maintain Shamiko.

    Also, Hide the Magisk app (ie. Magisk in stub) is broken in 27.0... You may need that. 🤠 PW
  • 1103
    This is the place for general support and discussion regarding "Public Releases", which includes both stable and beta releases.
    All information, including troubleshoot guides and notes, are in the Announcement Thread
    156
    Hello, I haven't given much support on XDA lately. It can be resulted from
    • University started and I have limited free time. In fact, I mostly develop during midnight
    • I live in Taiwan, which has large time zone differences between my European/American contributors/testers, which usually forces me to stay up late at night to discuss/test stuffs.
    • The new version is about to come, I don't want to spend effort on supporting old releases
    The planned update is delayed again and again, to some point I think I'll shed some light about what has been happening lately, also along with some announcements.

    New Forum!
    As you might have already discovered, Magisk got its own subforum on XDA! Many thanks to all the support you gave me, and much more information/features/support is about to come!
    **For developers supporting all the devices that are not using standard Android boot format, feel free to create threads in this section (actually, PLEASE do so) for your favorite devices after v7 is out. As I currently know, Asus devices require signing the boot image before flashing, and is model dependant; Sony devices seems to use ELF kernel that is unpatchable, or some has two ramdisks (inner + outer), both requires different workarounds; LG bootloader locked devices has to manually "BUMP" the boot image after flashing Magisk..... and there may be lots of other crazy boot image formats that haven't come up to my attention yet.
    It is impossible for me to support all these non-standard boot images, and I hope the community can collaborate to make Magisk running across all the devices. Overall, community collaboration is what XDA about :D

    The Pixel Phone
    Some of you might already know this news, that the next Pixel Phone right around the corner seems like it does not have ramdisk in boot image, which pretty much wrecked Magisk in all ways. However, it pretty much doomed root itself too. Kernel modifications is inevitable IMO, so I'll try to migrate my scripts to C programs that could possibly be included into the kernel itself. Note that I'm not familiar with linux kernel, I'm not even sure if my idea and concept is correct or not. But once the device is available, I think developers will find a way to bypass all the difficulties, and I'll do my best to learn things ;)

    Current Progress
    In the past month, I've spent quite some time learning SELinux, so that I can avoid using SuperSU's sepolicy patches. Thanks to the helps and tips from @phhusson and @Chainfire, I finally have a much clearer understanding of how SELinux works. The Magisk core parts (the scripts, boot image patches, new features, more supports) are actually done some time ago. What is causing all the delays is the Magisk Manager.
    To be completely honest, although I can code in Java without much issues, Magisk Manager is actually my first Android application, I had to reach out for assistance, and fortunately awesome developers like @DVDandroid and @digitalhigh contributed a lot, which makes the current Manager awesome.
    After the repo system and module management is mostly done, I was about to do some adjustments and release, but what we really done is decided to add another feature: auto-unroot with per-app settings. I decided to wait for it to be finished, and then do my adjustments. Due to reasons that'll be mentioned later, this feature will likely not be available for the next release (should come in future updates)

    Safety Net Disaster
    Those who are using Magisk for Safety Net bypass purposes must have known that Google recently updated the detection method of my Systemless Xposed. I still have no idea what Safety Net is detecting, so currently I cannot fix it on my side (also because I'm busy working on the next update). However, suhide developed by @Chainfire is able to hide Xposed and worked fine.
    However, only my Systemless Xposed v86.2, which is based on SuperSU's su.d, is supported using that method. v86.2 and v86.5 (latest, Magisk based) have nearly identical binaries, and the only difference is the path where the binaries are stored.
    I'm still not sure what's the real issue for it not being supported, I just hope it is not done intentionally.

    Conclusion
    Due to the fact that my Safety Net bypass is not 100% perfect now, I do not want to spend any more time waiting for auto-unroot to be polished. What I'm doing now is finishing up all the things I'd like to change in Magisk Manager (it has been a while since I last contributed to Manager, my fellow developers are doing all the heavy job), which might take a little more time, after that, packed with tons of information to be announced in Magisk Section, I'll release the long awaited update.

    Hope this lengthy post gives you the idea of the whole situation, and again thanks for all your support!!
    121
    Ah, some Chainfire bashing, I hope it is not too late for me to exercise additional villainy.

    First, let me make clear I have nothing against @topjohnwu, nor against Magisk. Magisk is an interesting project and it certainly displays @topjohnwu ingenuity and persistence. I don't doubt we will see more interesting things from his hands.

    -------------------------

    What has happened here is not all that dark and complicated, from either end. I returned from holidays, and someone pointed me at Magisk. My first thought: interesting!

    Among other things, the thread lists some issues with SuperSU, which in combination with the phrase The developer also requests users to not bug Chainfire with compatibility requests for SuperSU with Magisk from the portal article, raised my left eyebrow by nigh half an inch. The popular systemless xposed mod is apparently now based on it, and apparently it now no longer works with SuperSU, and apparently I'm not supposed to fix that, nor any of the other found issues. I found that a bit weird. So yes, I have told @topjohnwu that I was a bit surprised he was posting about issues with SuperSU without notifying me about them (I can't fix or help fix issues I'm not aware of, after all).

    He's also spreading a modified version of the SuperSU package, which is not all that uncommon, nor necessarily a problem. I have not looked into what he modified, I only ran a few quick tests on one of my devices, and found some commonly used commands run as root to be broken. I have informed him of this as well.

    It appears the tool of choice for Magisk is phh's Superuser, because of some of the mentioned issues with SuperSU. That's fine by itself, but fixing issues in that superuser by incorporating SuperSU's binaries into it is a somewhat questionable practise. After all, SuperSU is a commercial closed-source package that helps pay for my dinner, and superuser is a direct competitor. I have informed him that I was surprised he did this without asking for permission. I have expressed similar surprise on him spreading a modified version of LiveBoot (which helps pay for a snack now and then).
    @topjohnwu has also stated that Magisk's scripts are largely influenced by mine (I have not checked). Scripts based on mine are used all over the place on XDA, some people have crafted amazing things based on them, I have never made an issue of this (otherwise I would have just made them binaries). But yes, I have also stated to him that I don't think it's very nice to base something on one program, and then using that to (almost exclusively) push something directly competing with that program.

    tl;dr Towards @topjohnwu, I have:
    - expressed surprise he has issues getting Magisk to work with SuperSU, and has chosen not to inform me about those
    - expressed surprise he is using SuperSU binaries in a competing superuser without permission
    - expressed surprise he is posting a modified LiveBoot without permission
    - informed him of issues with the modified SuperSU he has posted
    - let him know I thought it wasn't very nice to be applying my scripts to benefit seemingly exclusively that same competing superuser

    To be crystal clear:
    - I have not asked for an apology
    - I have not asked for Magisk to be abandoned, neither the root hiding nor systemless module parts, and certainly not systemless xposed
    - I have not made an issue of any of this anywhere, until this post
    - I have not even specifically asked for anything to be taken down (though obviously in my opinion the other superuser package mixed with SuperSU's binaries, as well as the LiveBoot package, should go)
    - I have not reported this thread to XDA moderators for copyright violations or otherwise

    While my conversation with @topjohnwu may not win any awards for being friendly (though it may win some for brevity), I think all things considered my response has been rather mild. To be perfectly honest, until the apology post, I thought this was over with already. I think the apology post was triggered because I haven't replied to his last PM for a while - I was in the zone, it happens.

    To emphasize again, I have nothing against @topjohnwu, Magisk, or systemless xposed, and it is certainly not my goal to see any of them go. If it can be made to work together with SuperSU, great.

    I get it though: you think of something, you want to see if you can make it work, you finally get it to work, you publish it, it takes off - enthusiasm gets the better of you. Maybe in the rush some mistakes are made. That doesn't mean you have to just drop it and run. None of my stuff would make it past 0.1 if I stopped at the first big mistake :)

    Aside from said being in the zone coding, I usually regret actually responding to these sort of things the day after, which has made me hesitant to reply. Surprise me.
    76
    Thread temporarily closed so everyone sees this.

    The flood of "SafetyNet isn't working for me either!" posts are not helpful, at all. Please refrain from posting further, it will be looked into. Please do not forget that not passing SafetyNet is 100% NORMAL AND INTENDED when you have an unlocked booloader or running custom firmware. These are workarounds and they will be worked around in turn.

    The Flash
    Forum Moderator

    EDIT: Thread is reopened... I will be cleaning any SafetyNet posts for a while to keep the thread clean for real issues.
    75
    Hello everyone!

    I am aware that Google has updated Safety Net that makes Magisk itself a no go for Android Pay. In fact, I witnessed the change live while I am developing the new magiskhide, which should hide all Magisk modules and Magisk installed root.

    Google is serious about Safety Net now, clearly hunting down all possibility to run Xposed with Safety Net passed. I spend quite some time examining the new security measures last midnight, and fortunately it seems that it is possible to run Magisk and root along with Safety Net if no Xposed is running. I'm glad I removed the old root toggle at the right time lol, that is no longer feasible with the latest detection.

    So stay tuned for the next update, it will come with bug fixes, along with the new magiskhide to bypass that Safety Net.

    Google, how will a few systemless mods do any harm :p:p