[MOD][P905] selinux permissive on stock kernel LTE QUALCOMM ONLY!

[mame82]

Hi esgie,

I'm using a SM-P605 with rooted Stock KK-Rom. To get rid of "Enforcing" I first tried to modify the default.prop and init.rc of the ramdisk
as stated http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2487089&page=10 by akshizzle. After reading yout Posts, I commented out the "/dev/mem" and "/dev/kmem" lines from "/file_contexts". After repacking and flashing the boot.img the changes are visible in "/file_contexts", but after running your kmem-script selinux stays on "enforce". I'm not sure if it has to do with the permission-problem on "/dev/kmem", because I don't see any errors (I'm no Linux geek).

The problem I have is mainly the same as on P905, there's no valid kernel-source published for the stock KK rom (P605XXUCNE2 by the way).

Maybe it's a problem with the other ramdisk-changes to init.rc / default.prop, which I didn't revert when editing /file_contexts. Or has there more to be done than commenting out the 2 lines.

With best regards

MaMe82

 

[ziotom2]

Hi esgie,

I'm using a SM-P605 with rooted Stock KK-Rom. To get rid of "Enforcing" I first tried to modify the default.prop and init.rc of the ramdisk
as stated http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2487089&page=10 by akshizzle. After reading yout Posts, I commented out the "/dev/mem" and "/dev/kmem" lines from "/file_contexts". After repacking and flashing the boot.img the changes are visible in "/file_contexts", but after running your kmem-script selinux stays on "enforce". I'm not sure if it has to do with the permission-problem on "/dev/kmem", because I don't see any errors (I'm no Linux geek).

The problem I have is mainly the same as on P905, there's no valid kernel-source published for the stock KK rom (P605XXUCNE2 by the way).

Maybe it's a problem with the other ramdisk-changes to init.rc / default.prop, which I didn't revert when editing /file_contexts. Or has there more to be done than commenting out the 2 lines.

With best regards

MaMe82

now is published on samsung open sources.

Inviato dal mio SM-P605 utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[mame82]

Permissive SM-P605 Kernel

now is published on samsung open sources.

Inviato dal mio SM-P605 utilizzando Tapatalk

I managed to recompile a permissive Version, but don't know where to upload the img.

Picture here: h t t p : / / up.picr.de/18685970sw.jpg

 

[ziotom2]

I managed to recompile a permissive Version, but don't know where to upload the img.

Picture here: h t t p : / / up.picr.de/18685970sw.jpg

mega o dropbox could be a good choice

Inviato dal mio SM-N9005 utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[mame82]

Stock P605XXUCNE2 Kernel, SELinux switchable ("setenforce 0" from Terminal or "SELinuxModeChanger" from play), NTFS enabled.

Set ro.securestorage.support from true to false in /system/build.prop and reboot,if wifi passwords don't get rembered.

Link: odin flashable tar only for sm-p605 on p605xxucne2

 

[ziotom2]

Stock P605XXUCNE2 Kernel, SELinux switchable ("setenforce 0" from Terminal or "SELinuxModeChanger" from play), NTFS enabled.

Set ro.securestorage.support from true to false in /system/build.prop and reboot,if wifi passwords don't get rembered.

Link: odin flashable tar only for sm-p605 on p605xxucne2

confirm permissive. it works perfectly compliments. I linked your thread from the note 10.1 stream.

 

[shardsx]

First of all, a big thank you goes out to Mame82 for compiling his SELinux permissive kernel.

I've tried to use esgie's SELinux permissive kernel before, and while I do confirm that kernel is SELinux permissive with that particular kernel, I was not able to install Linux using the "Linux Deploy" app from Google Play. The first step of the installation is updating the environment for Linux and it fails right away.

Can someone using Mame82's SELinux permissive kernel also try to install Linux through the "Linux Deploy" app and let me know how it goes? The reason for using Linux Deploy and not the other alternative Linux installers is that I want to try and use Linux in framebuffer mode.

Thanks.

 

[mame82]

First of all, a big thank you goes out to Mame82 for compiling his SELinux permissive kernel.

I've tried to use esgie's SELinux permissive kernel before, and while I do confirm that kernel is SELinux permissive with that particular kernel, I was not able to install Linux using the "Linux Deploy" app from Google Play. The first step of the installation is updating the environment for Linux and it fails right away.

Can someone using Mame82's SELinux permissive kernel also try to install Linux through the "Linux Deploy" app and let me know how it goes? The reason for using Linux Deploy and not the other alternative Linux installers is that I want to try and use Linux in framebuffer mode.

Thanks.

Hi shardsx,

please be careful with the kernel cause its a build for p605 and a bit misplaced in this thread. Anyway I gave Linux Deploy a try and ubuntu runs with success. The problem is, that I'm forced to use vnc, framebuffer is not working. Although /dev/graphics/fb0 is present, "cat /dev/graphics/fb0" gives no such device. I checked the compile options and fb support is checked, msm fb support (snapdragon), too. So anybody who could give a hint what to do here is welcome.

Thanks in advance

 

[shardsx]

Deleted! I answered my own question by reading. Oops.

 

[alexander1995]

Stock P605XXUCNE2 Kernel, SELinux switchable ("setenforce 0" from Terminal or "SELinuxModeChanger" from play), NTFS enabled.

Set ro.securestorage.support from true to false in /system/build.prop and reboot,if wifi passwords don't get rembered.

Link: odin flashable tar only for sm-p605 on p605xxucne2

Thanks. Would you mind making one for P605 NE3 version?

 

[nadrojcote]

Will this work on note4 n910w8? I am wanting to disable selinux without using a custom kernel.

Thanks

 

[dragunbayne]

Would it hurt anything if I tried this on my P907A? Anything I couldn't take care of with ODIN?

 

[epic4grooted]

Will this work on 905v

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

[Demid65]

Seems like link for that file got corrupted. If anyone has a copy of it, can you please send it?