Well you do make some good points. I agree that a lot of people want to run blindly into tinkering with their phone without really understanding any of the process or motivations that should be for it. But there are also a lot of dev topics that are way above the heads of some of us. There needs to be a middle ground, and regardless of what that middle ground is, we need to keep it *civil*. XDA has a great reputation for keeping things civil compared to other forums, that's my point. Let's keep it like that
Now, as far as I can tell, the problem IS carrier-related, as other OTA's aren't having this issue. Should root cause this? No, you'd think. But... AT&T is one of the meanest when it comes to nutjob ways of shafting customizers. So this doesn't surprise me one bit. Either it's just poorly executed as some have suggested, or downright intended. Either way, it does feel like a carrier blame scenario from what I've been reading (and I've read every page closely).
You make valid points to have your opinion, and I respect it.
And this is where a lot of people will disagree with me completely about things...Sure, you can be irked that AT&T or Verizon or whoever locked down their variant harder than the other guy. But I also think that a lot of people don't play devil's advocate enough and look at it from their end. And when you do, you realize that they aren't doing it to be the bad guy and punish you, they have very valid reasons for doing what they do.
First of all, it's a support nightmare for both Samsung and AT&T. With how easy it is to mess something up, even on the most "open" carrier devices, it takes a lot of time and money to provide provide customer service and technical support to people who mess their devices up doing something that was not intended to be done. ATT/Samsung are businesses looking at profit margins, and they certainly don't want to spend what they don't have to providing support for modified devices. Yes, there should be an understanding that if you do something to mess it up, the fault is your own and you can't go looking to ATT/Sammy for a claim. But yet, how many people in this thread alone just said, "Screw it, I'm calling ATT, I'm going to Best Buy, I'm going to get them to reflash official software." Now imagine how many more people would be doing this if it were "easy" to exploit this device? How much time do you think you're taking away from the 55 year old mother who has legit issues with her cellphone that she didn't cause?
Secondly, it's a security nightmare. Rooting your phone is a very insecure, risky thing to do. So is leaving the bootloader unlocked (in fact, Google's own documentation for the Nexus devices implores you to never leave your bootloader in an unlocked state). Maybe this didn't matter much in the era of the G1 and the first Galaxy S. But as the smartphone market grew to the size it is now, and as people rely more and more on their devices to be secure and private places to store information, that stuff is super important. And the more people that come in here not knowing the real risks of having root access, flashing ROMs that contain unofficial or hacked software, or exploits for bootloaders and Knox, and trying to circumvent it, the more the nasty stuff has a chance at ruining someone's life. Banking information, tax information, credit cards, phone numbers, addresses, etc.
I've posted all of this before, and I was immediately called out for being a shill for the carriers. It seems that if you don't have the theory that ATT is purposefully harming us, you're against the community. I'm not. I love this community. But they have very valid, very important reasons for doing what they do. And you know, if it's not for you, if you want to be able to do all of this stuff without huge risks to your device being bricked....you know, get the Note on T-Mobile. Buy the unlocked version from Samsung. Or get a Nexus device. There are so many options out there for people who like to tinker and don't want the burden of possibly destroying their device. In the days of the G1 and the Vibrant, we didn't have such choices (aside from the N1, of course).