[PhilZ-cwm6][n7000] Stock Kernel+CWM6+Root+exFAT+NTFS-LTA

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34537819&postcount=1182


  • Total voters
    265
  • Poll closed .

shoey63

Recognized Contributor
Jun 5, 2012
4,003
3,982
253
Somewhere in Oz...
Works on my note too. Backup goes to ext sd card and restores without issue (even old cwm backups) Touch interface works good and buttons also work (for the faint-hearted). Characters not too big - in fact I have to put glasses on to read them clearly (eyes arent as good as they used to be) Cant wait for it to be integrated into kernel!:thumbup:

Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
 

Phil3759

Inactive Recognized Developer
May 30, 2012
9,557
33,049
0
Works on my note too. Backup goes to ext sd card and restores without issue (even old cwm backups) Touch interface works good and buttons also work (for the faint-hearted). Characters not too big - in fact I have to put glasses on to read them clearly (eyes arent as good as they used to be) Cant wait for it to be integrated into kernel!:thumbup:

Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
I will try to increase fonts and raws for the note, but will need someone to test it so we find a sweet post
Can someone post a pic on how it looks for the Note, so that I can figure it better?
 

Tassos_i

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2012
322
84
0
Athens
I tried cwm6.0.1.4 touch on my Note and here are my remarks :
1. Unlike previous version , my pc sees external sd card (in "mount usb storage"). That is good news and that would be even better if it could see the internal card too.
2. The "touch" controls are too sensitive (and subsequently dangerous) and this is the reason G. Lewarne dropped those controls definitely from hydracore's cwm. Dear Phil, you are doing a fantastic job without a GN7000, but I'm afraid you have to feel physically the "touch" controls on a real Note, so as to make your own opinion. This cannot be done by sending you some screens!

Thanks again for all you've done till now!

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
 

Phil3759

Inactive Recognized Developer
May 30, 2012
9,557
33,049
0
I tried cwm6.0.1.4 touch on my Note and here are my remarks :
1. Unlike previous version , my pc sees external sd card (in "mount usb storage"). That is good news and that would be even better if it could see the internal card too.
2. The "touch" controls are too sensitive (and subsequently dangerous) and this is the reason G. Lewarne dropped those controls definitely from hydracore's cwm. Dear Phil, you are doing a fantastic job without a GN7000, but I'm afraid you have to feel physically the "touch" controls on a real Note, so as to make your own opinion. This cannot be done by sending you some screens!

Thanks again for all you've done till now!

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
I am looking to fix the usb mount issue. Fact it is broken in original CWM6 for the i9100...
About the touch sensitivity, I need more feedback. On the i9100, it works like the new Siyah recovery, not more sensitive. Maybe it is too sensitive on the Note because of screen, not sure without a device in my hands. In any case, you cannot select a menu with tap, so no risks like with the original CWM6 touch from Koush (see the 6.0.1.2 touch version I already released, nice GUI but major error risk). To select, you have to use the bottom touch keys or swipe right
By the way, the phone back button, vol up/down and power menu can work for people that prefer non touch

Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Thanks a lot for the pic, yeh, too way small. Expected since it is the i9100 smaller screen recovery
Will fix it later
 
  • Like
Reactions: praetorius

shoey63

Recognized Contributor
Jun 5, 2012
4,003
3,982
253
Somewhere in Oz...
I tried cwm6.0.1.4 touch on my Note and here are my remarks :
1. Unlike previous version , my pc sees external sd card (in "mount usb storage"). That is good news and that would be even better if it could see the internal card too.
2. The "touch" controls are too sensitive (and subsequently dangerous) and this is the reason G. Lewarne dropped those controls definitely from hydracore's cwm. Dear Phil, you are doing a fantastic job without a GN7000, but I'm afraid you have to feel physically the "touch" controls on a real Note, so as to make your own opinion. This cannot be done by sending you some screens!

Thanks again for all you've done till now!

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
If you are not comfortable with "touch", just use the buttons. Works the same as non-touch version that way. (As just quoted by Phil in post above mine) Personally I like to swipe and then just press "enter" button @ bottom right.
 

Phil3759

Inactive Recognized Developer
May 30, 2012
9,557
33,049
0
Well,
I tried to play a bit with width/hight and it affects in a big manner the sensitivity
After releasing it for the i9100, I will look at enhancing touch experience for the Note
 

shoey63

Recognized Contributor
Jun 5, 2012
4,003
3,982
253
Somewhere in Oz...
Well,
I tried to play a bit with width/hight and it affects in a big manner the sensitivity
After releasing it for the i9100, I will look at enhancing touch experience for the Note
If modifying it causes headaches, would you consider doing a "pre-release - as is"?

---------- Post added at 05:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:18 PM ----------

special thanks for Doc Ketan without whose consistent and substantial support this thread could not be
thanks for putting us in the right
each time we were in a hurry and faltered .....
PS: thanks to all who helped porting this to the Note...... mainly dr.ketan who offered a valuable support. I would have never released the Note if he did not offer to continue the support in this thread. I just would not have the time and possibility (without a phone) to maintain any support.....
Couldn't agree more:)
 

dr.ketan

Recognized Developer / Recognized Contributor
Apr 9, 2011
34,362
67,752
263
Gujarat, India
drketanrom.com
Originally Posted by rraaka

special thanks for Doc Ketan without whose consistent and substantial support this thread could not be
thanks for putting us in the right
each time we were in a hurry and faltered .....

Originally Posted by Phil3759


PS: thanks to all who helped porting this to the Note...... mainly dr.ketan who offered a valuable support. I would have never released the Note if he did not offer to continue the support in this thread. I just would not have the time and possibility (without a phone) to maintain any support.....
Couldn't agree more:)
+1
You are right, development can't be hamper, if single person is not there, may be one from thousands of XDA member helped out if it couldn't be me.
BTW, If we were in place of each others certainly i wud like to congratulate you for phill's word, b'coz i have CARDIOMEGALY :p..
Regards.
 
Last edited:

shoey63

Recognized Contributor
Jun 5, 2012
4,003
3,982
253
Somewhere in Oz...
+1
You are right, development can't be hamper, if single person is not there, may be one from thousands of XDA member helped out if it couldn't be me.
BTW, If we were in place of each others certainly i wud like to congratulate you for phill's word, b'coz i have CARDIOMEGALY :p..
Regards.
Good luck Doc! Hope all goes well:fingers-crossed: BTW. My partner also has "enlarged heart" :( (Off topic -sorry)
 

Phil3759

Inactive Recognized Developer
May 30, 2012
9,557
33,049
0
If modifying it causes headaches, would you consider doing a "pre-release - as is" ?
When the recovery will be built from source for the n7000, things should be fixed, let's wait
I need first to release the i9100 because I can test it. The n7000 is basically same phone, so it is very easy to port.

Touch recovery for me is done now. Things to do before release:
- play with menu font size (bigger menus = better readability for older eyes but less text to show in file names...)
- try to fix the usb mount
- release the i9100
- release same n7000 version so you can test it
- release n7000 final

Then:
- add more check routines to my builder script if a new kernel changes too much code (will take me some time)
- make some order in my files and play with github to release sources (a bit of time)

Later (if I have time)
- add open script support (opensource alternatives to CWMManager and ROM Manager)
- ...
 

shoey63

Recognized Contributor
Jun 5, 2012
4,003
3,982
253
Somewhere in Oz...
OK, back on topic. Ran some tests on Ubuntu:_
Tungstwenty script on zImage from PhilZ-cwm6-DDLR9-INU-2.5-signed.zip produced this:-
[email protected]:~/Desktop/mmc$ ./mmc.sh

###############################################
# #
# GT-I9100 Kernel MMC_CAP_ERASE bug detection #
# By Tungstwenty - forum.xda-developers.com #
# [email protected] #
# #
###############################################

Detecting safety of kernel: zImage
Kernel: Linux version 3.0.15-1094171 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.4.3 (GCC) ) #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Sep 8 14:37:12 KST 2012

0 ocurrences of the bad code signature
1 ocurrences of the good code signature


The kernel has been patched by this method to disable MMC_CAP_ERASE and should now be entirely safe

[email protected]:~/Desktop/mmc$

Entropy's strings command on "recovery" file in cwm-touch-philz-6.0.1.4-i9100.zip shows this:-
[email protected]:~/Desktop/binary$ strings recovery |grep MMC
warning: %s: Wipe via secure discard suppressed due to bug in EMMC firmware

And on "update-binary" in same file results in this message:-
[email protected]:~/Desktop/binary$ strings update-binary |grep MMC
warning: %s: Wipe via secure discard suppressed due to bug in EMMC firmware
EMMC
EMMC:

So, once compiled, Phil3759's new "touch" kernel for the Note will, in effect be TRIPLE SAFE!!!
 

simplelife

Senior Member
Jul 6, 2012
1,081
526
0
When the recovery will be built from source for the n7000, things should be fixed, let's wait
I need first to release the i9100 because I can test it. The n7000 is basically same phone, so it is very easy to port.

Touch recovery for me is done now. Things to do before release:
- play with menu font size (bigger menus = better readability for older eyes but less text to show in file names...)
- try to fix the usb mount
- release the i9100
- release same n7000 version so you can test it
- release n7000 final

Then:
- add more check routines to my builder script if a new kernel changes too much code (will take me some time)
- make some order in my files and play with github to release sources (a bit of time)

Later (if I have time)
- add open script support (opensource alternatives to CWMManager and ROM Manager)
- ...
Touch CWM so sensitive , if you don't pay attention what you do then mistouch the option.( somehow I format my ex card,which I didn't want)
Will be better with bigger menu font size..for older eyes .You got its :laugh:
Hope see you on note 2 too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shoey63

Phil3759

Inactive Recognized Developer
May 30, 2012
9,557
33,049
0
Touch CWM so sensitive , if you don't pay attention what you do then mistouch the option.( somehow I format my ex card,which I didn't want)
Will be better with bigger menu font size..for older eyes .You got its :laugh:
Hope see you on note 2 too.
As I said, the final version will be fixed after your testings. It is the i9100 version, so it is expected to be that small font + too high sensitivity

OK, back on topic. Ran some tests on Ubuntu:_
Tungstwenty script on zImage from PhilZ-cwm6-DDLR9-INU-2.5-signed.zip produced this:-
[email protected]:~/Desktop/mmc$ ./mmc.sh

###############################################
# #
# GT-I9100 Kernel MMC_CAP_ERASE bug detection #
# By Tungstwenty - forum.xda-developers.com #
# [email protected] #
# #
###############################################

Detecting safety of kernel: zImage
Kernel: Linux version 3.0.15-1094171 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.4.3 (GCC) ) #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Sep 8 14:37:12 KST 2012

0 ocurrences of the bad code signature
1 ocurrences of the good code signature


The kernel has been patched by this method to disable MMC_CAP_ERASE and should now be entirely safe

[email protected]:~/Desktop/mmc$

Entropy's strings command on "recovery" file in cwm-touch-philz-6.0.1.4-i9100.zip shows this:-
[email protected]:~/Desktop/binary$ strings recovery |grep MMC
warning: %s: Wipe via secure discard suppressed due to bug in EMMC firmware

And on "update-binary" in same file results in this message:-
[email protected]:~/Desktop/binary$ strings update-binary |grep MMC
warning: %s: Wipe via secure discard suppressed due to bug in EMMC firmware
EMMC
EMMC:

So, once compiled, Phil3759's new "touch" kernel for the Note will, in effect be TRIPLE SAFE!!!
Thanks a lot for having tested the binary-update. I did not have time to do it and it was pushed at bottom of my todo list
When done, I will update all my releases with that safe binary-update as Entropy suggested
Thank you
 
  • Like
Reactions: shoey63

zard

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,463
307
213
CWM 6.0.1.4 Touch version ready for release

Good news,
I managed, thanks to the great support from gweedo767 and talustus (credits will be written later), to port cwm6 touch to the i9100

This is the stock CWM 6.0.1.4 with only added the touch code from Siyah repository

I attach here a temporary pre-release, tagged with some ui_prints that I will remove in final build if it is ok

It should work on the i9100, i777 and the N7000, with maybe wired too big characters on the note that I will fix later when I release a specific version for the N7000

Please try all functions, except flashing update.zip files if you are not on a safe kernel. If you are on my PhilZ-cwm6 kernel or any other safe kernel, you can also flash zip files safely

Enough said, try it and report please, include nandroid backup.

I already tested it on my phone, of course

Download here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=32066383#post32066383
Tried LR1 and LRK with latest kernel, cannot boot pass boot animation. CWM 6.0.1.4 with only added the touch code works great. Using unofficial Miui 2.9.21.

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2