Photo quality

Search This thread

XDA_RealLifeReview

RealLifeReview Dude
Nov 2, 2015
680
2,227
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).

Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
 

SeekerofLight.iz

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2013
64
33
Texas, US
I don't have very many samples but here's a few. Coming from a cheap $140 Umidigi Power with a blurry mess of a camera and slow specs, this seems like an absolutely insane jump in quality for the $200 I paid for this phone. It's not a Pixel by any means, but on a good day under the right conditions I feel this could compete with a few flagships. Excellent for a midrange phone, at least.

Full Album
(Some of the photos take a moment to load in full resolution.)

Pet Subjects
Cat 1
Cat 2
Cat 3 (GCAM)
Dog (64MP)

GCAM vs Stock (& Macro)
Flower (Stock Camera)
Flower (GCAM)
Flower (Stock Macro Camera)

Regular vs 64 Megapixel
Detailed Plate (Regular)
Detailed Plate (64MP)

Miscellaneous
Semi Low-light Candles
Moving Fan Set to Medium Speed
Small Star Fairy Light

My Takeaway
The Good:
The main shooter is actually very, very nice. This will honestly get the job done in most situations imo. When something is bad, you'll notice it every time. But when something is good, you'll forget about it and it will fade into the background. This is the kind of camera you'll forget about when you're looking back at family photos and videos. :good:
It's reasonably fast with a quick shutter speed (see the photo of the moving fan). With GCAM vs Stock, I really haven't done enough testing to tell, but GCAM tends to have more natural colors and probably has better performance in a few low-lighting situations (?). However, the stock camera actually has a crazy amount of utility, options, and flexibility though with things like raw photos, exposure peaking, focus peaking, and a pro mode to where I honestly think I might prefer it over GCAM. Xiaomi did well with it.

The Bad:
The macro camera is pretty bad. You're much better off shooting with the main camera and then just cropping in if you really want macro shots. The macro's really just there for the spec sheet. I haven't tested the ultrawide much, but it seems good. Not as good as the main obviously, but certainly good enough for me to want to use it. As for regular photos vs 64MP photos, I honestly don't notice very much of a difference other than the resolution literally just being bigger numerically. It's as if they took the regular photos and just stretched them up to 64MP size. Don't get me wrong, they're still good photos, but the two look the same to me in terms of how much detail is actually captured when you zoom in to them.

Otherwise, I'm blown away by this phone. As a relentlessly frugal person, I feel like I cheated with this phone lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: missytoby2000

yandoo

Member
Feb 15, 2016
47
3
What do you all think of autofocus? I switched from a Nokia 8 to this phone and the camera quality is great but the autofocus is pretty bad compared to my previous phone. Most of the times I have to take a second photo
 

Hablmet

Member
Feb 3, 2016
23
8
Šumperk
What do you all think of autofocus? I switched from a Nokia 8 to this phone and the camera quality is great but the autofocus is pretty bad compared to my previous phone. Most of the times I have to take a second photo

I've tested the phone for a few days now and the autofocus is all kinds of strange. Sometimes on closeups it does a great job, and in distant photos it works well too. But when I need to take a closeup of a 3D print it usually fails pretty hard.
Wonder if that can be fixed a little but since I've upgraded from a Redmi 4X, I am happy about the camera anyway.

My opinion on the camera?
The main cam is great in most circumstances. The aforementioned autofocus is a bit weird but nothing you can't fight through. With decent lighting, it's gonna do an outstanding job for the price, but the details are a bit worse off. That's usually not that big a deal. The AI feature is a nice touch, I use it to fix up the sky later in the gallery app.
Haven't tested the ultrawide properly yet, but it's rather competent in the pictures I've had so far. Colors and detail are a bit worse than the main, of course, but that's a given.
The camera app is also chock-full of details and options, so I really like it.
Portrait pictures using the depth sensor are sweet. They have a convincing blur to my eyes, and while the files are huge (a portrait of my brother was around 41MB), you can always fix a bit of that. The selfie cam is also pretty competent, but struggles in less than ideal lighting. Don't even try using it in a dim room.
Night photos are great! They have less detail than the standard daylight pictures, but they are decently bright, highlights are brought back up again and I've gotten some pretty good results in the countryside at night, which is where I live.

The bad parts? The depth sensor and macro cam are only there for the spec sheet so Xiaomi can say it's a quad camera array. Technically it is, but the macro cam is disastrously bad. The 2MP sensor just can't get enough detail in. I've seen some great 5MP sensor, so it's a bit of a shame one isn't here, but what can you do, this is a 230 dollar phone.

This would have been a flawless camera array for the price weren't it for the macro. I'm personally very happy, it does the photos I need with aplomb, and 90% of them are great.

Personally I'm gonna give it an 8/10.
 

Sarath69Kumar

Member
Sep 17, 2017
31
1
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).

Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

So for satisfied. Good at day and night mode is not much as I expected. I tried some Gcam and Arnova cam, NgCam, burial and other cams, but the stock cam did better compared to those. The problem is night mode doesn't seems good as expected. I dont want to compare with poco f1. I hope the update may change.
 

wahaj sheikh

Senior Member
May 8, 2016
99
15
Lahore
CG-Hgw2jx5z

test image using gcam normal mode
 
Last edited:

PurpleDarko

Member
Jul 28, 2015
5
0
Between the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro which has the best final camera, the measurements show the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. But in the many times I have seen on the internet sometimes it looks like the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is good and other times the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. What is the truth after all?
 

SkaboXD

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2017
1,132
445
Ganja
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Between the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro which has the best final camera, the measurements show the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. But in the many times I have seen on the internet sometimes it looks like the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is good and other times the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. What is the truth after all?

If you're looking sensor-wise,

Poco X3 NFC:
- more details in and around the center of the image (64MP + better tuned sensor)
- bit less noise (better tuned sensor)

Poco X3 Pro:
- better light sensitivity aka more light in photos (larger aperture)
- a bit better dynamic range (larger aperture)
- more details in corner of the photo (better optics)

Photo-wise, it's similar If you are using same Google Camera on both devices which means that there is no differentiation in photo processing.

Here is the example of center & corner details which I mentioned. This is the Poco X3 NFC vs Poco X3 Pro comparison using the same BSG Google Camera with SlibP lib on both phones. Poco X3 NFC on the left, Poco X3 Pro on the right.

Photo comparison (thanks to some user on 4pda). Also using the same BSG Gcam with SlibP.

1st photo:

POCO X3 NFC:

POCO X3 Pro:

2nd photo:

POCO X3 NFC:

POCO X3 Pro:

3rd photo:

POCO X3 NFC:

POCO X3 Pro:

Conclusion: Both sensors are great, it just depends on what you prefer more. More details or better dynamic range/night photos. Poco X3 Pro is in my opinion better all around as it still offers enough amount of details but with better quality optics which really matters, especially at night as Poco X3 NFC is terrible with lens flare effect.
 

Attachments

  • Center of the photo.png
    Center of the photo.png
    2.9 MB · Views: 71
  • Corner of the photo.png
    Corner of the photo.png
    3 MB · Views: 68
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MariferC and pnin

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 2
    Between the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro which has the best final camera, the measurements show the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. But in the many times I have seen on the internet sometimes it looks like the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is good and other times the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. What is the truth after all?

    If you're looking sensor-wise,

    Poco X3 NFC:
    - more details in and around the center of the image (64MP + better tuned sensor)
    - bit less noise (better tuned sensor)

    Poco X3 Pro:
    - better light sensitivity aka more light in photos (larger aperture)
    - a bit better dynamic range (larger aperture)
    - more details in corner of the photo (better optics)

    Photo-wise, it's similar If you are using same Google Camera on both devices which means that there is no differentiation in photo processing.

    Here is the example of center & corner details which I mentioned. This is the Poco X3 NFC vs Poco X3 Pro comparison using the same BSG Google Camera with SlibP lib on both phones. Poco X3 NFC on the left, Poco X3 Pro on the right.

    Photo comparison (thanks to some user on 4pda). Also using the same BSG Gcam with SlibP.

    1st photo:

    POCO X3 NFC:

    POCO X3 Pro:

    2nd photo:

    POCO X3 NFC:

    POCO X3 Pro:

    3rd photo:

    POCO X3 NFC:

    POCO X3 Pro:

    Conclusion: Both sensors are great, it just depends on what you prefer more. More details or better dynamic range/night photos. Poco X3 Pro is in my opinion better all around as it still offers enough amount of details but with better quality optics which really matters, especially at night as Poco X3 NFC is terrible with lens flare effect.
    1
    I don't have very many samples but here's a few. Coming from a cheap $140 Umidigi Power with a blurry mess of a camera and slow specs, this seems like an absolutely insane jump in quality for the $200 I paid for this phone. It's not a Pixel by any means, but on a good day under the right conditions I feel this could compete with a few flagships. Excellent for a midrange phone, at least.

    Full Album
    (Some of the photos take a moment to load in full resolution.)

    Pet Subjects
    Cat 1
    Cat 2
    Cat 3 (GCAM)
    Dog (64MP)

    GCAM vs Stock (& Macro)
    Flower (Stock Camera)
    Flower (GCAM)
    Flower (Stock Macro Camera)

    Regular vs 64 Megapixel
    Detailed Plate (Regular)
    Detailed Plate (64MP)

    Miscellaneous
    Semi Low-light Candles
    Moving Fan Set to Medium Speed
    Small Star Fairy Light

    My Takeaway
    The Good:
    The main shooter is actually very, very nice. This will honestly get the job done in most situations imo. When something is bad, you'll notice it every time. But when something is good, you'll forget about it and it will fade into the background. This is the kind of camera you'll forget about when you're looking back at family photos and videos. :good:
    It's reasonably fast with a quick shutter speed (see the photo of the moving fan). With GCAM vs Stock, I really haven't done enough testing to tell, but GCAM tends to have more natural colors and probably has better performance in a few low-lighting situations (?). However, the stock camera actually has a crazy amount of utility, options, and flexibility though with things like raw photos, exposure peaking, focus peaking, and a pro mode to where I honestly think I might prefer it over GCAM. Xiaomi did well with it.

    The Bad:
    The macro camera is pretty bad. You're much better off shooting with the main camera and then just cropping in if you really want macro shots. The macro's really just there for the spec sheet. I haven't tested the ultrawide much, but it seems good. Not as good as the main obviously, but certainly good enough for me to want to use it. As for regular photos vs 64MP photos, I honestly don't notice very much of a difference other than the resolution literally just being bigger numerically. It's as if they took the regular photos and just stretched them up to 64MP size. Don't get me wrong, they're still good photos, but the two look the same to me in terms of how much detail is actually captured when you zoom in to them.

    Otherwise, I'm blown away by this phone. As a relentlessly frugal person, I feel like I cheated with this phone lol
    1
    Autumn sunset, from Brazil