Post your ICS Quadrant & Bencemark screenshots results

[simms22]

the very latest cm9 kang by @gearheadcustoms with trinity s144 1.44ghz kernel. looks like cm is starting to pick up in performance.

 

[radianter]

higher than my marks...

 

[barendvl]

Hi all, this is actually my first post on this forum so don't shoot me dead yet - I already am happy to have found a relevant thread addressing my issue (using search!).

I installed stock 4.0.3 ics from OTA, and did a factory reset after the initial flash.

My Quadrant standard score is 1086, which seems very low.
In the system information section, it says my CPU speed is just 400MHz whereas 1GHz should be the maximum possible.

Are the 3000-6000+ scores only possible with root+custom rom e.g. CM?
Or is it too early to compare with ICS yet?

Thank you for your reply.

 

[mrgv]

barendvl: Same here. Also pretty new at this.

Wiped everything, installed drewgaren ics 3.1 rom, wiped dalvik, installed matr1x 12.5 but had problems with video, wiped dalvik, installed glados2.2.

All three kernels have given me similar quadrant scores ranging about 1100-1400 which are much lower than the 2000'ish scores I was almost seeing with 2.3.6 and netarchy's kernel...

That said, the system is A WHOLE LOT faster and more responsive with both matr1x and glados... Feels like the quadrant score should be twice as high!

Any ideas why so low?

 

[stkiswr]

Quadrant isn't updated for ics.

 

[semprom]

i9023 4.0.3 STOCK Everything

Avarage score?
I think i will flash CM9 when is avalable.

 

[Sevchenko]

Rom: NexusBeam 4.1.0 IML74K
Kern: stock 3.0.8

Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

 

[dzerveviktory]

around 1200 here was 1000 before i forced hardware gpu

ROM info would help...

Crespo Peter Alfonso 12.20 Nightly GLaDOS 2.2 Ondemand Forced GPU

 

[wchrisyu]

So my Schwartz is slightly bigger or slightly longer, depending on stat, than others.

 

[wchrisyu]

I ran quadrant standard just to get a baseline against any future quadrant release.
It doesn't really mean anything, like benching my z400 work machine with gaming benchmarks.

 

[antibox]

Benchmarks are just that. You can use them to see if tweaks make improvements or not. If the UI is smooth and it functions how you would expect then don't worry about benches.

But it is fun to see how far we can push these little devices.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk

 

[Nedzadk]

Here is mine score, btw. i use stock ICS, so no custom kernel or any modifications (no root no nothing):
Score: 1139

[EDIT] also i did not turned on "force gpu" [/EDIT]

 

[seriosbrad]

I got like 2300, 1.2 GHz and the phone specs in my sig.

I got about 60 less when i turned on forced GPU

 

[brendan802]

I'm getting 2500-3000 on quadrant with aosp's v41 and glados 2.2

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

 

[nodstuff]

Matr1x v13.0
Nexusbeam 4.0.1
Smartassv2
1300/200
Liveoc 105%

Quadrant scores:
3434 Max
2876 min

I have a screenshot but I'm on my phone now and can't attach it. I'll do it later.

 

[KrisMurdrum]

Quadrant isn't updated for ics.

I don't think AnTuTu is either. I performed an AnTuTu, a Quadrant, and a SD Speed Test and there is a discrepancy in the SD scores

I'm running unlocked and rooted Nexus S with ota ICS and stock kernel.

Carved into runes with my ICS powered Magic Rune Stone

 

[phone_user]

by leejunha32

GLaDOS v2.0

NexusBeam 4.1.0

Live OC 113%

arm_volt = 1475mV

int_volt = 1250mV

Performance


※ GB

T144-NS-16112011 / NSCollab 1.0.50 / LiveOC 112 / performance / arm_volt 1475mV, int_volt 1250mV

 

[demo23019]

LMFAO at those I/O hacks/"tweaks" to manipulate IO scores. When are you people going to learn?
Ill say it again, this time becasue it IC...IO is pointless and should be taken out of benchmark (And on others test) the SD card bench ....On a nexus s standpoint CPU and GPU ":hardware"is were you will see performance enhancements not filesystem....look at PCs. end user tweaking filesystem has no drastic nothing at least to the extent of what these quadrant graphs are showing they make it look faster than CPU lol
anyways quadrant is crap not becasue its like 3 -4 years old but becasue of the fact it can be manipulated...this was the case with GB result becasue everyone incorporated some sort of filesystem tweak (purposely and unwillingly)becasue they came with most custom kernels.
Also just because one score i higher doesn't mean you phone is faster...unless you OC CPU or GPU or have more RAM
and does have these higher io mean you phone is faster or quicker in anyway over stock LOL no


try using a real benchmark that has been updated and cant be manipulated

Anyways results with stock rom with glados [email protected] 1.2 after 3 runs no manipulation....note this is stock IO

y7es yes its fun to use quadrant but not a proper test and now acurate so why use it? lots of other one out there

 

[hr_kaleu]

just for interest - mine is 1169

pure stock rom ICS, no modifications

cheers

 

[info[]box1]

Just a little something. Running a non-public ICS ROM with Ezekeel v2.9 Ltd test kernel size14mb) smh lol.

Screen#1

Gov: lazy
Min: 400
Max: 1200
LiceOC: n/a
Score: 2113

Sent from my SPH-D720 using xda app premium

sign up to stop censorship... http://blacklists.eff.org