[QUERY] Does your TRUESMART really have a 1.3GHz CPU??? Post your results here...

[mghtymse007]

A growing number of people are claiming that their OMATE TRUESMART's maximum CPU speed
is being reported by some popular HW apps to be 1.0GHz
....not the 1.3GHz as noted in the specs.​

At the time if this post, a relatively small number of TS's have reported this discrepancy. BUT, in comparison to the number of TS's currently in circulation...this needs to be addressed in order to determine if it's a possible defect, or issues in the source code.

To scan your TS, you can use:

CPU-z
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cpuid.cpu_z

CPUspy
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bvalosek.cpuspy

Hardware Info
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dama.hardwareinfo

To get a SCREENSHOT of the report:
Hold BOTH top and bottom buttons simultaneously for 1 sec.

POST YOUR RESULTS HERE​

XDA Members & Identified 1.0GHz TRUESMART's

FEB 16 2014
Xda member: mghtymse007
Screenshot: yes
Max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: stock 20140120 w/patch

xda member: BurnQc
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: Imperium_Operative_v1.1.0_V2.0,

xda member: kiesman0
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)

xda member: jhax01
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)

xda member: Quension
screenshotL no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)

xda member: trent999
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)

xda member: Neosolidus
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120

xda member: robowald
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)

xda member: fg
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)

Update 2/18/2014
xda member: pkshr
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1
Firmware: 20140120

xda member: rawr
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120 and Imperium 1.1.0

xda member: mety333
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1
Firmware: 20140120

xda member: x86cpu
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120

xda member: jonpaul
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120

xda member: vagelis
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120

xda member: jcfitz
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20131207

xda member: jwheeler73
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: Imperium 1.1.0

xda member: bucho54
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120

 

[kiesman0]

NA 1900 1/8
20140120.15 4604_V2.0
stock/pre patch

 

[jhax01]

Mine shows 1ghz as well, but honestly, I could care less. It works and I'm sure I could overclock it if I really felt the need...

Model - N/A 1/8 - (Nov Dev)
ROM - Imperium Operative v1.1.0 v2
App - Cpu Z
Max clock - 1 ghz

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

[trent999]

Mine shows 1gHz too. You don't care, OK, but the device was promoted as 1.3gHz on KickStarter and is being sold to pre-orders as 1.3gHz dual core.
It is wrong to advertise as a 1.3gHz devise but deliver a 1.0 GHz device. Imagine if Samsung did that...

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Lokifish Marz]

Mine shows 1gHz too. You don't care, OK, but the device was promoted as 1.3gHz on KickStarter and is being sold to pre-orders as 1.3gHz dual core.
It is wrong to advertise as a 1.3gHz devise but deliver a 1.0 GHz device. Imagine if Samsung did that...

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

I think you are looking at it the wrong way. There are many others that do not have this issue. If the majority of x201 users are running at 1.3GHz then those running at 1.0GHz are problematic units that needs to be brought to the attention of whom ever you got them through.

 

[mghtymse007]

@trent999 Can you post a screenshot? PM if you're having trouble.

I'm with you on this one...1366MHz is quite different than 1001MHz...its one of the reasons I held off getting a SimValley.

BUT..AT THIS TIME, we know very little....IF and ONLY IF, this was a PROVEN, deliberate action taken by Omate, can we begin to sling mud.

Lets keep this thread to the facts, for now. Once we have more information, a more educated conclusion will be drawn.

 

[jhax01]

Mine shows 1gHz too. You don't care, OK, but the device was promoted as 1.3gHz on KickStarter and is being sold to pre-orders as 1.3gHz dual core.
It is wrong to advertise as a 1.3gHz devise but deliver a 1.0 GHz device. Imagine if Samsung did that...

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Fair enough. I added my data point for the benefit of others, my opinion was not requested but a freebie. At this point, I have no confidence Omate would do anything about it that I would consider timely or convenient so I'm simply saying that I'm willing to accept the discrepancy for a KS project. Omate is not Samsung, nor do I expect them to be any time soon. I don't get mad at kids running a lemonade stand that promises fresh organic lemons, but provides a concentrate and tap water either. I just accept it and move on. Clearly that's not right for everyone, but it is for me and that's all I was trying to convey. Peace...

---------- Post added at 01:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 PM ----------

I'd also like to point out that my device is not in a stock condition. It is running loki's rom. That may have nothing to do with anything, but if I were a manufacturer, I would ask what modifications have been made. Just something to consider when data collecting. On the flip side, does anyone have a screen shot of one running at 1.3??

 

[Lokifish Marz]

I'd also like to point out that my device is not in a stock condition. It is running loki's rom. That may have nothing to do with anything, but if I were a manufacturer, I would ask what modifications have been made. Just something to consider when data collecting. On the flip side, does anyone have a screen shot of one running at 1.3??

Omate is well aware of the changes made as we have discussed all the changes. LLP himself runs my work as well as others at Omate. And even though I do not list every individual file change in the ROM or Patch thread, the list is fairly detailed. As far as the Patch vs the ROM, there is very little core difference between the two.

On a further note, the 1GHz unit I did get my hands on was running at 1GHZ without any modifications at all.

 

[robrowald]

Omate is well aware of the changes made as we have discussed all the changes. LLP himself runs my work as well as others at Omate. And even though I do not list every individual file change in the ROM or Patch thread, the list is fairly detailed. As far as the Patch vs the ROM, there is very little core difference between the two.

On a further note, the 1GHz unit I did get my hands on was running at 1GHZ without any modifications at all.

So if my device reports 1gHz It's a problem? Damn it, mine says 1gHz and always has. I just figured it was a firmware issue.

 

[Neosolidus]

Well we are in a pickle!

My paper weight also reports 1ghz on stock 20140120.

I noticed the 1ghz as soon as i got it but assumed Omate did some ninja changes to the stock firmware to improve battery(limiting the CPU is the quickest and laziest way to improve battery life).

I lent my device to a friend to check it out so i can't test this but anyone with the 1GHZ device willing to flash an older firmware to rule out hardware issues?

 

[jhax01]

Omate is well aware of the changes made as we have discussed all the changes. LLP himself runs my work as well as others at Omate. And even though I do not list every individual file change in the ROM or Patch thread, the list is fairly detailed. As far as the Patch vs the ROM, there is very little core difference between the two.

On a further note, the 1GHz unit I did get my hands on was running at 1GHZ without any modifications at all.

I was in no way suggesting that it was somehow attributable to your ROM, but I have been around the block a few times and have seen very strange behavior and results from the simple act of flashing in and of itself with all other things being equal. In my particular case, my gut tells me that the chip was not up to spec and was downgraded by the manufacturer, yet installed anyway even though it couldn't meet minimum spec. It happens, and I've seen it happen with the big guys too, HTC in my own experience, but I'm sure there are others. Most people never know...

 

[jhax01]

Well we are in a pickle!

My paper weight also reports 1ghz.

Like I said, I'm still waiting for a screenshot showing 1.3!! Lol...maybe it is firmware, an attempt at extending battery life...

 

[Lokifish Marz]

Like I said, I'm still waiting for a screenshot showing 1.3!! Lol...maybe it is firmware, an attempt at extending battery life...

Currently on a test build for the fixed official firmware by me but flashing back to full stock Jan20 firmware to pull a 1.3GHz screencap right now.


Update
Stock Jan20 firmware screencap now attached. I'll hold off doing any firmware work in case somebody needs more info from stock firmware.

Model- PR 512/4 2100
Firmware/ROM- Stock 20140120
App used- Z-Device Test (also show 1.3GHz five other apps as well)
Max clock listed by app- 1.3GHz

 

[robrowald]

using cpu-z I get 1 core at 598 Mhz (clock speed 598Mhz- 1.00GHz) and 1 core stopped

November Dev unit 1g/8g
US Bands
Stock with Patch
App Used: CPU-Z
Max Core Speed: 1GHz

 

[kuronosan]

Fair enough. I added my data point for the benefit of others, my opinion was not requested but a freebie. At this point, I have no confidence Omate would do anything about it that I would consider timely or convenient so I'm simply saying that I'm willing to accept the discrepancy for a KS project. Omate is not Samsung, nor do I expect them to be any time soon. I don't get mad at kids running a lemonade stand that promises fresh organic lemons, but provides a concentrate and tap water either. I just accept it and move on. Clearly that's not right for everyone, but it is for me and that's all I was trying to convey. Peace...

---------- Post added at 01:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 PM ----------

I'd also like to point out that my device is not in a stock condition. It is running loki's rom. That may have nothing to do with anything, but if I were a manufacturer, I would ask what modifications have been made. Just something to consider when data collecting. On the flip side, does anyone have a screen shot of one running at 1.3??

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[kuronosan]

I'm also running stock, by the way.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[Lokifish Marz]

In case this becomes a long thread and to keep data accurate I'd like to request the following;

Reporting device uses the following template

Model- (PR 512/4, EU 512/4, NA 1/8, EU 1/8)
Firmware/ROM- (located in Settings/System/About at the very bottom)
App used-
Max clock listed by app-
Attach a screenshot

Also like to request that the OP keep a tally of this info update (with a date attached) in the OP.

 

[fg]

just checked, count another NA1900 1/8 model with 1ghz max cpu. stock omate jan2014 firmware.

 

[mghtymse007]

In case this becomes a long thread and to keep data accurate I'd like to request the following;

Reporting device uses the following template

Model- (PR 512/4, EU 512/4, NA 1/8, EU 1/8)
Firmware/ROM- (located in Settings/System/About at the very bottom)
App used-
Max clock listed by app-
Attach a screenshot

Also like to request that the OP keep a tally of this info update (with a date attached) in the OP.

will do...

ANYONE WHO HAS ALREADY POSTED THEIR RESULTS, PLEASE POST WHICH TS YOU HAVE. THANKS​

 

[Neosolidus]

Model- ( NA 1/8 KS Dec "Dev"edition )
Firmware/ROM- (20140120 Firmware)
App used- CPU-Z
Max clock listed by app- 1001(598-1001)
Attach a screenshot(lent the device to a friend to check it out so won't have access to the SS for a while)