Dfaq is NDA
National dating agency?
Or national acoustics association
Sent from my MB526 using xda app-developers app
Thank you for spoonfeeding me
I am now fed.
I was lazy to go off the XDA
Sent from my MB526 using xda app-developers app
Did you not see the warning posted by a Sneior Moderator? Now you're hearing it from a Moderator...Stay on topic, or suffer the consequences.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice"
Sent from my Galaxy Note (i717), using XDA Premium.
Don't mind Bob, he's XDAs resident grumpy old man.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.....
*reaches down and grabs shotgun next to me rocking chair
_______________________________________
"fat bottomed girls, you make this rocking world go round"
---------- Post added at 04:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:54 PM ----------
It's been maybe a year or so since I brought this up. Zelendel put a thread for most of the captivate roms in the the forum's q&a. Nowadays you see lots of discussion threads in general. Both those keep dev talk in dev.
I'm just requesting that the SMs pass word down to the FSMs under them to maybe suggest to devs and teams they have under them to make either a dedicated [email protected]/discussion thread for their rom. It's a trend I see that ought to be encouraged further.
Even the RCs can make one for a rom they use that doesn't already have one. It just keeps the place clean and points noobs to the correct place to post.
Also, a link to it in the OP of the rom, too. Then it doesn't get lost when it's a couple pages down in the forum.
_______________________________________
"fat bottomed girls, you make this rocking world go round"
Yea, if the dev wants that, but it's common practice the developer doesn't want that for various reasons.
1* monitoring 2 threads
2* he wants his main thread on top of the first page for lots of (rea$ons) etc
So it's not that easy![]()
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Then the only problem would be getting people to stop posting in the dev thread and post in the Q&A thread.Dev doesn't have to keep up with it. Most aren't done by the dev so far. It's users helping users. A Q&A thread would be best if the dev wants to keep discussion in the dev thread.
Dev doesn't have to keep up with it. Most aren't done by the dev so far. It's users helping users. A Q&A thread would be best if the dev wants to keep discussion in the dev thread.
Then the only problem would be getting people to stop posting in the dev thread and post in the Q&A thread.
Take the ParandoidAndroid ROM for example. For the bigger device forums it has a specific thread to ask any questions instead of asking them in the dev threads.
The PA Q&A threads I'll mention specifically are in the S2 & S3 forums respectively. Even though both of those threads have had quite a few people posting in them, it's nowhere near effective enough at stopping the questions in the development threads.
It could be argued that if some people have used the Q&A threads then it hasn't been a total waste of time. I don't agree with that, however. If someone asks their question in the Q&A thread and it hasn't been answered over a period of a few hours, yet someone else asks a similar question in the development thread and gets an answer instantly, what's the first person automatically going to think? "If I ask my question in the dev thread it'll get answered quicker"
The solution can't simply be putting a link to the Q&A thread in the OP because as we know, a ton of users apparently don't know that the OP exists.
I've been approved by Snowflake. Jealous?![]()
The bottom line is, people do not read, they expect to be spoonfed. We can have fancy flashing signs, read receipt rules etc etc etc, but it will not work. We need to change their mindset, i.e. that XDA is not a service/help forum, but a forum where you come to research, read, dev etc
You guys could give me free reign to flame the noobs. In my opinion, it's just as insulting to pop into a thread and ask a question without reading as it is to call someone a retard for not searching. I know not everyone agrees, but I've proven that it does actually work. Being nice seems to reinforce the bad behavior, while calling them names shows them a consequence for their actions. I know this won't catch on, but I figured I'd pop in and be grumpy this morning.
Dear admin/s, I take this opportunity to express my great resentment and disappointment in the attitude if one TheDeadCPU, who has chosen to close down kquicksalls thread in the inc s ROM development sub-forum. I realise the action has occured due to ruffling of the feathers of the above-named admin, who has taken umbrage to initiate such drastic action.....
Hey, I'm speaking plain English now, on behalf of all users of his thread; please re-instate kquicksall and tell the dead CPU to take anger management classes and vent his frustrations elsewhere.....
Thanks.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
Thats true when a good or bad relationship is made with a mod not specifically here but any forum it can make things very unfair to the user but there are plenty that do there job's as they should almost like a judge where no matter the situation your ruling is fair based not on who is involved but on the situation at hand. Things can go bad with mods though and be unfair, when I was at xbox-hq I formed a good relationship with all the admins and mods except one, I'm not going to give his name but I had proven he was giving out misinformation a number of times and banning the ones who called him out or got pissed cause he screwed up there xbox with what he was telling them to do, I was the one along with my buddy wes and a few others that was on there getting them all working again. One day he banned me for it so I emailed the site admin and since I had already been talking with them about what he was doing and the problems he was causing killing ppl's box's and banning ppl the way he was not for any site rules violation but because he wanted to for whatever lame reason he had. Anyways I emailed the site admin and since I was already in the running to be a mod he unbanned me banned the offending mod and gave me his position. After that no one had any problems. Over here I see no real problems with any of our mods, they all seem to have the site, its procedures, and rules in best interest and thats how it should be. I know mods do form friendships and sometimes problems with users but it should never be a part of a decision they make it makes things unfair to other users, just like trying to force mods to look into someone getting a position is unfair to the person trying and looks bad on them and the person they're trying to get it for. I've looked into nils work on here and he shouldn't have much trouble getting dev status but everyone but him really should stay out of it cause you're making him look bad and making this whole process harder on him and adding alot of stress he could do without as being a dev for any device/console etc... is already stressful. Anyways nils I hope things work out for you, and mods keep up the good work, I know with how large the site is you guys put in alot of hard work keeping things under control and your work and services are highly under appreciated. On the topic if requests I agree that a noob specific section would be great for ppl just coming to android wp7 etc. When coming here it puts alot if ppl in way over their head trying to find the right info to get started and it would hopefully cut down on repeat threads asking the same things, how do I start dev, how do I find this or do that. It'd also be great if in chef central we could get a sticky with links that are kind of burried in the threads in there that are helpful to beginning rom cooking as there are way too many how do I start rom cooking threads started in there that pushes the useful info further and further into the far reaches of chef central that could all be easily answered this way, I know cyanogen's topic over there is stickied but its really only a small part of the good info burried in CC.
Sent from my i897 w/Andromeda 3, Suckerpunch kernel, & 1.3Ghz OC using Tegrak.