[ROM][4.3 JSS15Q][UNOFFICIAL] NLNP AOKP [BUILD #1][jflteatt]

[sky_fox]

So had actively ran this and tested? It looks really cool and nolinuxnoparty didn't play. He has some cool stuff he's posted like a script that completely downloads and sets up all the things needed to get an android building environment up and running . Its a pretty damn good script too , I must say. I used it when my PC crashed and didn't want to re-install the while build environment manually .

Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 4

 

[CPA Poke]

So had actively ran this and tested? It looks really cool and nolinuxnoparty didn't play. He has some cool stuff he's posted like a script that completely downloads and sets up all the things needed to get an android building environment up and running . Its a pretty damn good script too , I must say. I used it when my PC crashed and didn't want to re-install the while build environment manually .

Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 4

I couldn't even get the zip to flash...got a binary error in TWRP. Was going to try the international version, but never got around to it.

 

[sky_fox]

I couldn't even get the zip to flash...got a binary error in TWRP. Was going to try the international version, but never got around to it.

Thanks for the heads up . Almost flashed this glad and now I'm glad I didn't.

Sent from my GT-I9505G using Tapatalk 4

 

[thewierdone]

looking forward to this

Hey really looking forward to this. I tried to flash and it got and error status 0 I'm on philz touch and don't know if I did something wrong. I flashed the att build on my at&t galaxy s4. Sorry for noib question

 

[CPA Poke]

Hey really looking forward to this. I tried to flash and it got and error status 0 I'm on philz touch and don't know if I did something wrong. I flashed the att build on my at&t galaxy s4. Sorry for noib question

Literally look two posts above yours mane.

 

[dligon]

is there a later build than the 9/14 cause I don't see it.

 

[CPA Poke]

is there a later build than the 9/14 cause I don't see it.

Nope. Apparently the dev has "left the building" for one reason or another as someone said in another thread (click on his tag, you'll see that the account is disabled). Not sure why this thread is still alive, actually. Lol

 

[Ker~Man]

Nope. Apparently the dev has "left the building" for one reason or another as someone said in another thread (click on his tag, you'll see that the account is disabled). Not sure why this thread is still alive, actually. Lol

The Dev's account is enabled again, now, though. It doesn't have the "account disabled" tag below their avatar like it did before. Plus, this post was originally in the Non-Original a.k.a. regular Dev thread prior to today, if my memory serves me correctly... But, like you said, it seems as though there is still zero sign of the Dev for some time, now - as well as zero updates/recent support.

 

[nolinuxnoparty]

The Dev's account is enabled again, now, though. It doesn't have the "account disabled" tag below their avatar like it did before. Plus, this post was originally in the Non-Original a.k.a. regular Dev thread prior to today, if my memory serves me correctly... But, like you said, it seems as though there is still zero sign of the Dev for some time, now - as well as zero updates/recent support.

Well, The account disabled thingy was a mistake by one of the mods. I've talked to @svetius and he's looking into it!