[ROM] [6.0.1] Official CyanogenMod 13

[Grarak]

Am I the only one who thinks that the color profile on stock was better? Just asking for opinion. As @Grarak said, the battery performance is not as good but who cares, we have dash charging.

I love cm.

You can tune color profiles as you want. Dash charge will not work in future releases, since OnePlus refuses to release its sources in kernel.

 

[sir-harlekin]

Well that is a nice trick of Oneplus with the dash sources...

 

[VVMM]

Isn't dash charge a hardware feature? Why does the installed ROM matter to enable or disable dash charge?

 

[Grarak]

Isn't dash charge a hardware feature? Why does the installed ROM matter to enable or disable dash charge?

Because software is required to use dash charger?
Software is required for anything your device does.

 

[brajesh.sharma87]

You can tune color profiles as you want. Dash charge will not work in future releases, since OnePlus refuses to release its sources in kernel.

Then how does it work now? It's disappointing from oneplus. Any source where they said so.

Sent from my ONE A3003 using Tapatalk

 

[Grarak]

Then how does it work now? It's disappointing from oneplus. Any source where they said so.

Sent from my ONE A3003 using Tapatalk

I don't think it will work at all right now. I don't have the dash charger. I bugged them about the missing sources. They said they are working on it.

 

[SmashTime1904]

Just wondering will this device get COS or will it stay unofficial?

 

[brajesh.sharma87]

I don't think it will work at all right now. I don't have the dash charger. I bugged them about the missing sources. They said they are working on it.

In my opinion its working as my phone charged from 21% to 61% in 18 minutes. Took around 60 minutes for full charge from 21%. Charging is slow from 90% onwards but that was also the case in stock.

 

[Grarak]

In my opinion its working as my phone charged from 21% to 61% in 18 minutes. Took around 60 minutes for full charge from 21%.

This build has dash charging working, I used private kernel sources from OnePlus which has everything included. I didn't expect that they will just remove it for OSS.

 

[brajesh.sharma87]

This build has dash charging working, I used private kernel sources from OnePlus which has everything included. I didn't expect that they will just remove it for OSS.

Its gonna be a setback if this happens. The battery life is not so good and if the dash charging will not work in future, many people will stick to stock rather than using cm. is this what they want?

Bdw, thank you for the efforts that you have put in.

 

[amolpingle]

Screenshots please!

Sent from my HM NOTE 1W using XDA-Developers mobile app

 

[brajesh.sharma87]

I guess many people are not aware that the op3 comes with a feature called 'rapid discharge'

Seriously disappointed with the battery performance. Don't know if it's a problem with the rom.

Sent from my ONE A3003 using Tapatalk

 

[brajesh.sharma87]

Really !? Are u F serious bro ?! Device is like few days 'old', these early custom builds are just for testing, and already complaining ? Xda should start noob friendly guide for noobs ...

Noob... Right? I don't know how come you came to this conclusion. Prior to this device, I have used plenty of development friendly devices which includes nexus 4,oneplus one. I posted my observations based on the same configuration I used to have on my previous phone. This can also be taken as feedback.

I guess, neither you own this device nor you are using this cm13 build at the moment. Otherwise you wud'nt have come here for preaching.

Furthermore if you want to discuss on this, kindly come on PM so that we can stay on topic here.

 

[Grarak]

Updated.

Changelog is in OP. Dash charge won't work for now.

 

[Tia_93_]

I don't get why it worked in the first release and doesn't in the second. Why couldn't you keep the part that makes it work? I'm just curios and very ignorant, don't want to be rude or something.

 

[Grarak]

I don't get why it worked in the first release and doesn't in the second. Why couldn't you keep the part that makes it work? I'm just curios and very ignorant, don't want to be rude or something.

How about read the thread?

 

[Tia_93_]

How about read the thread?

I did. Probably it's my bad, but how comes that the "private kernel source" were usable before and now not anymore?

 

[Grarak]

I did. Probably it's my bad, but how comes that the "private kernel source" were usable before and now not anymore?

Because it's private?

 

[brajesh.sharma87]

Because it's private?

But you had access to it.

Please don't get me wrong. I was also about to ask it when the last time you replied to me.

Sent from my ONE A3003 using Tapatalk

 

[Lodberg]

But you had access to it.

Please don't get me wrong. I was also about to ask it when the last time you replied to me.

Sent from my ONE A3003 using Tapatalk

I don't get why it worked in the first release and doesn't in the second. Why couldn't you keep the part that makes it work? I'm just curios and very ignorant, don't want to be rude or something.

If the two of you don't have any advice for solutions or positive feedback then please don't post here. It's a developer thread for developers.


Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk