[ROM] LG V10 H901-10c Debranded, Debloated, Deodexed ROM - Clean & Stable

Apache0c

Senior Member
Aug 3, 2010
648
140
0
SoCal
The notification went away but the phone will still/has already downloaded the update and you're wasting 1GB of internal storage on it. That's why the correct way is to disable the OTA service.
Well I'm guessing that 1Gb won't be needed within the next few months anyway and I'm flashing your M build as soon as you make it available [emoji4] [emoji1] [emoji2] [emoji3]

Sent from my LG-H901 using XDA-Developers mobile app
 

siraltus

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,997
1,733
133
Well I'm guessing that 1Gb won't be needed within the next few months anyway and I'm flashing your M build as soon as you make it available [emoji4] [emoji1] [emoji2] [emoji3]
I'm just saying... it's your phone. :) I just posted how to actually disable the entire OTA checking mechanism, not just hide the notification.
 

siraltus

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,997
1,733
133
Last edited:

scloutkst

Senior Member
Mar 26, 2011
525
331
93
31
Chicago
I would appreciate if you didn't quote old versions of my posts; they are not what I originally intended to say, which is why I edited the post.

I'll look into this and see how viable it is for my ROM.
It was quoted before it was changed. I didn't mean for anything like that. I'll just erase it.

Sent from my LG-H901 using XDA-Developers mobile app

---------- Post added at 05:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:03 AM ----------

I would appreciate if you didn't quote old versions of my posts; they are not what I originally intended to say, which is why I edited the post.

I'll look into this and see how viable it is for my ROM.
Also i wasn't trying to say any one here is better than another. All I was doing was pointing out what I thought was a break through. I stumbled on it, and couldn't believe that it wasn't being talked about more. I didn't mean to stir anything up in your thread. I probably should have sent you a message. I apologize. I have enjoyed your work since the day I got my phone, wouldn't have kept it otherwise. Thanks again.

Sent from my LG-H901 using XDA-Developers mobile app
 
  • Like
Reactions: loganfarrell

siraltus

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,997
1,733
133
It was quoted before it was changed. I didn't mean for anything like that. I'll just erase it.

Also i wasn't trying to say any one here is better than another. All I was doing was pointing out what I thought was a break through. I stumbled on it, and couldn't believe that it wasn't being talked about more. I didn't mean to stir anything up in your thread. I probably should have sent you a message. I apologize. I have enjoyed your work since the day I got my phone, wouldn't have kept it otherwise. Thanks again.
I wasn't saying you're trying to stir up anything, I said it looks promising and I'll test it, I appreciate you pointing it out. :)
 

siraltus

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,997
1,733
133
I read the other thread and I think I'll wait a while to see what you have to say about all this.. :)
I'm not holding my breath, but who knows. Usually, anything that has to be seriously hacked/modified to work will likely cause problems and not be 100% stable for long-term use, but there are the rare exceptions. I might try it out of curiosity, but only after I verify I can revert back to 100% Lollipop. If I can't, I don't want to risk bricking my phone because I went through FOUR exchanges to get a perfect V10 (no light bleed, good colors, good speaker).

My current official strategy for my ROM is to wait until there is a 100% reliable method of flashing TWRP on the stock Marshmallow bootloader so that people don't have to install another ROM (the one hacked for LP bootloader) before they install mine and then run into potential problems or have to wipe their phones and start over when we do get a working MM TWRP installation method. I want to keep things as simple as possible.
 

SkindogOne

Senior Member
Feb 7, 2016
82
73
0
Santa Clarita
My current official strategy for my ROM is to wait until there is a 100% reliable method of flashing TWRP on the stock Marshmallow bootloader so that people don't have to install another ROM (the one hacked for LP bootloader) before they install mine and then run into potential problems or have to wipe their phones and start over when we do get a working MM TWRP installation method. I want to keep things as simple as possible. :)
Take your time pimp were not going anywhere :)

- Skindog on a LG-H901 and SM-P600

Indifference is a choice!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: siraltus

NYLimited

Inactive Recognized Contributor
Jan 5, 2008
3,815
2,285
253
40.75659° N 73.98626° W
I'm not holding my breath, but who knows. Usually, anything that has to be seriously hacked/modified to work will likely cause problems and not be 100% stable for long-term use, but there are the rare exceptions. I might try it out of curiosity, but only after I verify I can revert back to 100% Lollipop. If I can't, I don't want to risk bricking my phone because I went through FOUR exchanges to get a perfect V10 (no light bleed, good colors, good speaker).

My current official strategy for my ROM is to wait until there is a 100% reliable method of flashing TWRP on the stock Marshmallow bootloader so that people don't have to install another ROM (the one hacked for LP bootloader) before they install mine and then run into potential problems or have to wipe their phones and start over when we do get a working MM TWRP installation method. I want to keep things as simple as possible.
Have you tried Flashfire at all? It backs up ALL the partitions on the device, including boitloaders. I have done restores from/to 5.1.1 without issues and the latest version can create backups one can flash through fastboot (I have not played with this). I wonder if it could bring one back to 5.1.1 from a 6.x attempt...
 
  • Like
Reactions: siraltus

thisisjason

Senior Member
Nov 13, 2014
129
56
0
I'm not holding my breath, but who knows. Usually, anything that has to be seriously hacked/modified to work will likely cause problems and not be 100% stable for long-term use, but there are the rare exceptions. I might try it out of curiosity, but only after I verify I can revert back to 100% Lollipop. If I can't, I don't want to risk bricking my phone because I went through FOUR exchanges to get a perfect V10 (no light bleed, good colors, good speaker).

My current official strategy for my ROM is to wait until there is a 100% reliable method of flashing TWRP on the stock Marshmallow bootloader so that people don't have to install another ROM (the one hacked for LP bootloader) before they install mine and then run into potential problems or have to wipe their phones and start over when we do get a working MM TWRP installation method. I want to keep things as simple as possible.
That sounds like a good strategy. I'm very happy to stay on this current ROM for however much time that takes, as it's been extremely stable for me. I trust your work :good:
 
  • Like
Reactions: siraltus

alphahere

Senior Member
Nov 6, 2010
657
176
63
I have been following the MM thread and once you switch to MM you can't go back. Anyway this really sucks but I guess this is like samsung. You can mess up your device if the flash is not done correctly. LG pulled a fast one. I have not had a device before that was completely unlocked then the company switch the update to locked. I mean bootloader unlocked. Really LG did not lock the bootloader it looks like they removed the fastboot commands. I could be wrong but that is how I read it. Sucks.

By the way this rom in the OP was super stable for me and can understand why folks would want to hang tight.

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: siraltus