Here some quick 'n dirty through a window test videos without any interesting content :silly:Any 4k and 1080p video samples from this?
But you have to give up the slomo function, I see?

There can only fit 4 video options on the screen at once because...But in the OP there is another Screenshot?
...yup! :good:Is the menu scrolling now?
First of all thanks for the great MOD.Was amazed the G4 wouldn't record video's at 60fps so decided to alter some files to make it work.
I also increased the bitrate and the photo quality is upped to 100% percent as well. Note: both will increase the file sizes by a large amount! Decreased the threshold where you can still take flash shots from 15% to 5% battery.
There's also a version with a much higher bitrate (from 30Mb/sec to 64Mb/sec) when using the UHD camera. Do note, this increases the filesize when making movies by a *large* amount![]()
File for 1080p 60fps at 30Mbps, UHD at 40Mbps, photo's untouched here :good:First of all thanks for the great MOD.
But I tried JPG at 100% in the past and that creates such a high file size that I'd love for the MOD to be able to set this by hand, or maybe you could make a version that doesn't touch pictures (at all). Hope you could think about it (see you at GoT!)
No.Supports all handsets in about 240 dpi?
There were three values in the xml: 95, 80, 70.@Pfeffernuss
Before settings the JPEG quality to 100, did you noticed what was the LG's value?
Thanks
whaooo 70% was used for the highest photo definition that's it? :cyclops:There were three values in the xml: 95, 80, 70.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lysbwt7fd4hg68s/Screenshot_2015-06-15-00-46-45.png?dl=0
To be honest I have no idea what those three individual numbers meanwhaooo 70% was used for the highest photo definition that's it? :cyclops:
That was kind of heavy compression. Thanks we now have 100% quality.
I guess thoose 3 numbers are the JPG quality for different picture size (in pixel).To be honest I have no idea what those three individual numbers meanIn the zip there all set to 100, indeed. Whether that makes a lot of difference: again, no idea, haven't made a scientific test (yet)
![]()