AT&T 4G LTE in the firmware...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1162330
and the phone coming thru FCC
http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/01/...f-at-the-fcc-confesses-its-atandt-lte-secret/
I'm guessing it will be similar in specs to the Rogers LTE Galaxy S2. They share the same model number http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1731269-Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-LTE-coming-to-RogersJust posted by DG in the captivate section. The FCC just sent through ANOTHER ATT phone, the i727 SGS2 with LTE. Looks like the i727 passed FCC 2 weeks ago on Sept. 1st. I am SO CONFUSED...
Last time I checked, 727 is different than 777.......I'm guessing it will be similar in specs to the Rogers LTE Galaxy S2. They share the same model number http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1731269-Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-LTE-coming-to-Rogers
That page has been up since like a day after the announcement...
Actually this page was just updated from general announcement to the actual feature page. Before the actual tech specs were not listed and it was in the announcement format as opposed to the current format, which is what they use when selling devices.That page has been up since like a day after the announcement...
Even wikipedia has that page referenced on Sep 1st:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II#References
^ a b "Samsung Galaxy S™ II, available at AT&T". Samsung Mobile. Retrieved 1 September 2011.
Well according to this picture the model number is I727Last time I checked, 727 is different than 777.......
Sent from my GT-I9100M
Sorry, but I'll take the Samsung website's I777 over anything else.Well according to this picture the model number is I727
[/IMG]![]()
Oh, I was talking about the Rogers Lte version and the possible At&t Lte version that someone mentioned earlier.Sorry, but I'll take the Samsung website's I777 over anything else.
Sent from my GT-I9100M
Oh, I gotcha. I just re-read it. My bad....Oh, I was talking about the Rogers Lte version and the possible At&t Lte version that someone mentioned earlier.
No... whats really injustice is how Americans are going to get the SGSII 6 months late just because Att wants to milk their current old tech phones (Atrix, Infuse) for an extra 6 monthsThats injustice how are those phones getting 2.3.5 and we are still struggling with some beta 2.3.4 versions.
no worries, I was all confused lolOh, I gotcha. I just re-read it. My bad....
Sent from my GT-I9100M
Actually it will be the last couple of weeks in october AT&T is pushing there currewnt stock of atrix hard and hitting people with a $35 restocking fee so they cant return for the GS2 when its released in october.No... whats really injustice is how Americans are going to get the SGSII 6 months late just because Att wants to milk their current old tech phones (Atrix, Infuse) for an extra 6 months![]()
You are angry at the wrong group. The FCC did not even approve the SGSII until the end of July. All of the carriers were waiting on the government. Then they have to get their marketing, packaging, stock, etc.No... whats really injustice is how Americans are going to get the SGSII 6 months late just because Att wants to milk their current old tech phones (Atrix, Infuse) for an extra 6 months![]()
Not really true. The SGS II the US is getting is substantially different from the inter national version (see NFC and button layout change). If the i727 was approved in July, AT&T has been sitting on it since then. We could've had it in May like the rest of the world if AT&T hadn't requested changes.You are angry at the wrong group. The FCC did not even approve the SGSII until the end of July. All of the carriers were waiting on the government. Then they have to get their marketing, packaging, stock, etc.