I have to say I find the speck case to hit every important point.
* Thin as possible in all directions. Ok really, I would like it even thinner. I'd love something that just protects the screen and nothing on the back or sides. The glowlight film is ridiculously easy to damage. That's the only reason I would even use any case at all. I'd rather scratches and character than any extra junk at all. But I tried that and I got glowlight film damage inside a week. If I had a regular nst instead of nstg I wouldn't use any case.
* Flat. No buckles or anything sticking out. That makes it unstackable, and the buckle poses a damage risk to the nook and anything else it is packed/stacked with, ie your laptop screen etc.
* Protects the screen. See above.
* Convenient. No need to remove for reading or charging. Loose parts? Well, it would be nice to read while holding only the unadorned device itself, and a sleeve does allow for the possibility of a pocket to keep a charger & cable always with the device. But then again staying charged is not a problem with this device and all in all I'd just rather not have separate parts to futz with.
* Light weight. I like nice materials like leather and brass, but they are heavy, and this is a portable device. Plastic and pleather are practically weightless, and bonus, impervious to beer, wine, rain, snow, etc... All things that anything I will carry with me at all times, will see often. Save the leather for for the car and nice books that you don't carry around everywhere every day
* Cheaper than the thing it's protecting. Protect a $70 to $130 device with $70 case? No. I mean it would be nice but really only in such calm and controlled environments that you wouldn't actually need any case at all in the first place.
Just wanted to point out that there is really a lot going on with that Speck case that might not seem obvious at first glance. I haven't found anything better yet without giving up one or more of the properties above.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium