I have two questions and one of them I'm hoping someone can either point the flaw in my logic or try it out
So firstly, has Motorola released sources for the boot loader as they should in accordance with the GPL? If so could we not do the same as I am suggesting with next question,
Seen as we have kernel sources and we can compile it could we not compile the same kernel as we have, ie compile the 179 group kernel ourselves, (it would have to be am exact duplicate to a kernel we have already), take our compiled kernel and a moto compiled kernel, look at them at a binary level and reverse engineer the signing key from the differences between them?
I know there must be a part I'm missing but still its just a thought
teamwork makes the dream work
So firstly, has Motorola released sources for the boot loader as they should in accordance with the GPL? If so could we not do the same as I am suggesting with next question,
Seen as we have kernel sources and we can compile it could we not compile the same kernel as we have, ie compile the 179 group kernel ourselves, (it would have to be am exact duplicate to a kernel we have already), take our compiled kernel and a moto compiled kernel, look at them at a binary level and reverse engineer the signing key from the differences between them?
I know there must be a part I'm missing but still its just a thought
teamwork makes the dream work
