well actually f2fs is an improvement but not an absolute solution
pros :
-improved write rates
- very improved random 4k read/writing ( ext4=7000 iops read 4000 write ; f2fs: 10000read/8000write)
- excellent filesystem for small files reading
-SQLite operation rate improved (ext4: 2000-2500 op/s ; f2fs: 2500-3500 op/s)
cons :
- slightly decreased sequential read (big files);
- #only on this device , noticed higher latency on opening apps (opening 10 apps on disco mark ; ext4: 4-6seconds ; f2fs: 7-8seconds)
- need modification in the rom's ramdisk to allow mounting f2fs partitions
-need f2fs compatible kernel
these are the results of my observation and benchmarking during a few months on f2fs , I finally came back to ext4 because of the latencies )