[UnORom][3.4Kernel] CM-11 Android 4.4.4 [Stable v2.0][29 July][Final]

sjknight413

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2009
2,659
1,310
0
Brighton, England
The build is ready. http://xda.shantur.com/pyramid/roms/cm-flemmard/
It replaced the old build from tonight.


Ignore this for the moment, some issues.
I noticed a new build had just gone up after you posted this, when you posted this the builds time was 9:03, now it's 11:03.
Is this 11:03 build okay to use?

EDIT: no worries, you posted the answer at the same time :) haha
 

sjknight413

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2009
2,659
1,310
0
Brighton, England
Flashed the rom and tried the camera, don't know if it known or not but pictures with flash are colorless, and not autofocus, here is example from pictures with and without flash in med-low ligh room... :)
hmmm how strange...
this also happens with the team sennyc2 builds, i thought this camera was meant to be better?
does it autofocus correctly without flash? as in the cursor turns green once it finds focus? also is the camera generally faster?
 

shantur

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2010
1,094
3,073
0
Flashed the rom and tried the camera, don't know if it known or not but pictures with flash are colorless, and not autofocus, here is example from pictures with and without flash in med-low ligh room... :)

Have you tried same stuff on any sense rom?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Mile_zdr

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2013
931
289
0
Bitola
hmmm how strange...
this also happens with the team sennyc2 builds, i thought this camera was meant to be better?
does it autofocus correctly without flash? as in the cursor turns green once it finds focus? also is the camera generally faster?
No, It doesn't have autofocus at all ,touch to focus works great , and yeah i think the camera is faster and i think in good light pictures are better , also noticed that pictures with flash from a distance (not to close like the apple picture) are good not colorless :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sjknight413

sjknight413

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2009
2,659
1,310
0
Brighton, England
No, It doesn't have autofocus at all ,touch to focus works great , and yeah i think the camera is faster and i think in good light pictures are better , also noticed that pictures with flash from a distance (not to close like the apple picture) are good not colorless :)
Ah, doesn't sound all bad then :) thanks for the info!
i'll report with my results once i've flashed tonight.
 

Mile_zdr

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2013
931
289
0
Bitola
Have you tried same stuff on any sense rom?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you are talking about close pictures with flash (like the apple) i have and the colors are more alive

Edit: other report that i forget to mention is , that sometimes when trying to focus display flickers for very short time (mili second) in something like yellow-orange color..
 
Last edited:

lovendsuicide

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
406
179
0
Porto
Touch to focus turns green but most of the time pictures are out of focus... During the focus period image is clear but when it finishes focusing its blurry...

For close objects with flash on seems that switching focus mode from auto to infinity gets better pictures, example attached.

Also camera seems to be a bit faster but can't make a good comparison because I rarely take photos with my phone.

Sent from my Sensation using Tapatalk
 

Attachments

denis111

Senior Member
Aug 6, 2008
165
26
48
Barcelona
www.keygenmusic.net
Great rom!
2 more bugs:
USB OTG seems not working, at least without external power supply (i've connected a keyboard and can't type). Maybe it's just not enabled?

2. HDMI doesn't work (obviously :) ), but this rom does react when connecting hdmi:
Code:
03-24 19:23:14.753 E/qdexternal(166): openFrameBuffer: /dev/graphics/fb-1 is not available
03-24 19:23:14.753 E/qdexternal(166): configure: Failed to open FB: -1
03-24 19:23:14.763 E/BufferQueue(166): [FramebufferSurface] setDefaultBufferSize: dimensions cannot be 0 (w=0, h=0)
03-24 19:23:14.873 E/qdoverlay(166): Failed to call ioctl MSMFB_DISPLAY_COMMIT err=Bad file number
03-24 19:23:14.873 E/qdoverlay(166): static bool overlay::eek:verlay::displayCommit(const int&, uint32_t): commit failed
03-24 19:23:14.873 E/qdhwcomposer(166): hwc_set_external: display commit fail for 1 dpy!
03-24 19:23:14.893 E/qdoverlay(166): Failed to call ioctl MSMFB_DISPLAY_COMMIT err=Bad file number
03-24 19:23:14.893 E/qdoverlay(166): static bool overlay::eek:verlay::displayCommit(const int&, uint32_t): commit failed
03-24 19:23:14.893 E/qdhwcomposer(166): hwc_set_external: display commit fail for 1 dpy!\
...
So there's no /dev/graphics/fb-1 device. I've created a symlink named fb-1 pointing to fb1 and here's what happens:
Code:
03-24 19:45:57.813 E/qdexternal(166): readResolution: edid_modes file '/sys/devices/virtual/graphics/fb-1/edid_modes' not found
blahblahbah...
As i don't know how to create a link under sysfs i don't know how to continue but all we need is just have /sys/devices/virtual/graphics/fb-1/ directory the same as fb1 one to continue testing. Or how do i create a link in /sys ?
 

69gm

Senior Member
Jun 27, 2011
1,384
574
0
Honolulu, Hawaii
I am getting mixed results with camera. Sometimes it focuses fine. Other times it doesn't seem to know what focus is! The indicator turns green and takes a picture...but it's a blurry picture. It thinks "blurry" is in focus! Notice when switching from taking close ups to taking far pictures, everything stays blurry even though the indicator goes green. Something about it's depth of field is funny...

It's "almost" there! Hope someone can make it perfect!

---------- Post added at 10:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 AM ----------

I am getting mixed results with camera. Sometimes it focuses fine. Other times it doesn't seem to know what focus is! The indicator turns green and takes a picture...but it's a blurry picture. It thinks "blurry" is in focus! Notice when switching from taking close ups to taking far pictures, everything stays blurry even though the indicator goes green. Something about it's depth of field is funny...

It's "almost" there! Hope someone can make it perfect!
Oops, also wanted to report that for some reason, on of my shortcuts (specifically Yelp) keeps disappearing from a folder on my dock. All the other ones are fine. Does this ROM not like Yelp? LOL!
 

sjknight413

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2009
2,659
1,310
0
Brighton, England
Just finished flashing and setting up!

- the camera is definitely a lot better than team sennyc2's cm11, not to demean their work in any way though! The focus is a tiny bit hit and miss, but I'm in a poorly lit room so I'm sure in daylight it's just fine. Quality is a lot better too! Better even than 3.0 kernel based Kitkat roms

- the rom itself definitely seems more stable than other KitKat roms, only marginally though

- multitasking seems a bit better than team sennyc2's build too, though the minfrees are the same so I don't know how. Better optimised I guess?

All in all this is brilliant :) if nightlies keep going I will be sticking to this for the foreseeable future. Good job Flemmard and Shantur!

EDIT: Also, now we have a near perfect 3.4 kernel that is based on AOSP and not derived from sense I guess we can start being more optimistic about getting the next major version of android on the sensation? ;)
 
Last edited:

denis111

Senior Member
Aug 6, 2008
165
26
48
Barcelona
www.keygenmusic.net
I got some progress on HDMI. Well, i just hex-edited quickly liboverlay.so to change the line "int Overlay::sDpyFbMap[DPY_MAX] = {0, -1,-1};" to "int Overlay::sDpyFbMap[DPY_MAX] = {0, 1,-1};" to make the device be fb1 by default and not fb-1 (I don't know how to properly fix it, it should be fixable without changing overlay.cpp). And i got hdmi semi-working, it's very buggy, sometimes the phone hangs completely. When i connect it first i can see the upper part of an image and the bottom part is blue. When i reconnect the cable i can see the whole image fine but the screen flickers every second or so so it's not usable. Attaching a patched liboverlay.so in a flashable zip if someone else wants to test and 2 fotos showing what i get.

Also I'm suggesting to Flemmard to add this line into init.pyramid.rc:
chown system system /sys/devices/virtual/graphics/fb1/hpd

Without this it gives more errors in logcat :)
 

Attachments

JanSpatschek

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2012
315
54
0
Waidhofen
www.rlbrt.de
Deleted

---------- Post added at 01:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:13 AM ----------

Clean flashed this ROM today through 4ext and got a random reboot EVERY single time the display went dark after screen timeout. Like e.g. the screen went off and 10 seconds later the HTC splash screen showed up again. I will include a last_kmsg: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5xpEXQcSQncTmxGOGJNQk5iSk0/edit?usp=sharing
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sjknight413

spuri78

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2007
2,112
1,560
0
Bris Vegas
Just finished flashing and setting up!

- the camera is definitely a lot better than team sennyc2's cm11, not to demean their work in any way though! The focus is a tiny bit hit and miss, but I'm in a poorly lit room so I'm sure in daylight it's just fine. Quality is a lot better too! Better even than 3.0 kernel based Kitkat roms

- the rom itself definitely seems more stable than other KitKat roms, only marginally though

- multitasking seems a bit better than team sennyc2's build too, though the minfrees are the same so I don't know how. Better optimised I guess?

All in all this is brilliant :) if nightlies keep going I will be sticking to this for the foreseeable future. Good job Flemmard and Shantur!

EDIT: Also, now we have a near perfect 3.4 kernel that is based on AOSP and not derived from sense I guess we can start being more optimistic about getting the next major version of android on the sensation? ;)
What about the audio? Have you set up Viper4Audio with this rom? How is it?

Thanks,
Sam