Look forward to your work.FYI: I'll have a complete update for this later, I.E you will be able to flash from any rom / kernel, as long as you have updated to 3.1
Look forward to your work.FYI: I'll have a complete update for this later, I.E you will be able to flash from any rom / kernel, as long as you have updated to 3.1
Just fastboot flash boot boot.img from the link u linked.[IMAGES] HMJ37 (USA WiFi 3.1)
Can someone point to a link where i can get a flashable stock kernel? Getting the same update aborted, I am running stock 3.1 but with a custom kernel.
Thanks.
But will that delete my data?Just fastboot flash boot boot.img from the link u linked.
No boot is just the kernel.But will that delete my data?
su isn't in /system/bin?just got done flashing no super user with v04
You sure? Mine came with v2.3.6.1 installed.just got done flashing no super user with v04
assert failed: apply_patch_check("/system/etc/vold.fstab")
yeah preaty sure I'll try to redo itYou sure? Mine came with v2.3.6.1 installed.
I'll be uploading v05 in the next hour, which skips all the checks and flashes system. Stand by for that, instead.I'm getting:
Do I need to flash 3.1 boot.img to fix?Code:assert failed: apply_patch_check("/system/etc/vold.fstab")
Great, thanks!I'll be uploading v05 in the next hour, which skips all the checks and flashes system. Stand by for that, instead.
Won't this open it for vulnerability? I mean, if the checks fail there must be something wrong, no?I'll be uploading v05 in the next hour, which skips all the checks and flashes system. Stand by for that, instead.
You can manually remove the two files and symlink:How about updating the Superuser.apk and su to the new bacon that ChainsDD has out there? Because I'm trying to update to it and just can't. Have tried uninstalling Superuser using Titanium to install the new one and that's a no-go.
/system/app/Superuser.apk
/system/bin/su
/system/xbin/su
I added one check in system.prop to verify that the ro.product.model is set to "Xoom".Won't this open it for vulnerability? I mean, if the checks fail there must be something wrong, no?