Cool mateYou (and everyone else) are granted full permission to use anything I have done with or without credit for anything at all. Go wild!![]()
Cool mateYou (and everyone else) are granted full permission to use anything I have done with or without credit for anything at all. Go wild!![]()
when you say adb shell, can i use Android Terminal Emulator from the Market?Cleaning cache is very easy... Just run adb shell and do the following:
rm -rf /data/dalvik-cache/*
Yup. But remember that it will remove all the cached dalvik files so rebooting and starting apps will take longer because it has to generate the cache again.when you say adb shell, can i use Android Terminal Emulator from the Market?
and do I type su first then
rm -rf /data/dalvik-cache/* ?
Cleaning cache is very easy... Just run adb shell and do the following:
rm -rf /data/dalvik-cache/*
it says rm failed for -rf, No such file or directoryYup. But remember that it will remove all the cached dalvik files so rebooting and starting apps will take longer because it has to generate the cache again.
Is there really a performance difference? I guess the OS has to look up the symlink each time? Good point, didn't really think about it!Cool matesame goes for my stuff! Btw. good work with the fix! I do however recommend using mount instead of symlink. Should be better performance, but a bit slower startup since it has to mount on every boot.
put a 'busybox' in front -- busybox rm -rf whateverit says rm failed for -rf, No such file or directory
.....
there is a space between -rf and /data...it says rm failed for -rf, No such file or directory
.....
You get the same if you do: su -c "rm -rf /data/dalvik-cache/*" ?it says rm failed for -rf, No such file or directory
.....
Well... I guess it does since I got 2813 with my fix. I think that's the highest anyone have got so farIs there really a performance difference? I guess the OS has to look up the symlink each time? Good point, didn't really think about it!
Woops! I guess that's my bad lolthere is a space between -rf and /data...
Well... I guess it does since I got 2813 with my fix. I think that's the highest anyone have got so far
I'm also thinking about doing a hybrid-fix with having some of the stuff on the external SD as well. Perhaps have system, app and app-private there? This would probably boost performance even more since you will be using two separate storage devices which would give you more bandwidth to work with... Also better for multitasking.
I'm also looking into that kernel with yaffs2 support that rasdeep released. Using yaffs2 instead of ext2 should boost it even more!
Ill take a look though your scriptsI want permission from RyanZA and Tayutama since I've used much of their work, and also need some people to test it out so I can squash some bugs.
i think this workedput a 'busybox' in front -- busybox rm -rf whatever
Woah.. huge difference for mount vs symlinks?!Well... I guess it does since I got 2813 with my fix. I think that's the highest anyone have got so far
I'm also thinking about doing a hybrid-fix with having some of the stuff on the external SD as well. Perhaps have system, app and app-private there? This would probably boost performance even more since you will be using two separate storage devices which would give you more bandwidth to work with... Also better for multitasking.
I'm also looking into that kernel with yaffs2 support that rasdeep released. Using yaffs2 instead of ext2 should boost it even more!
Sure go ahead! Well, I wanted to ask since I used your update.zip in my release to root and get the right busybox heheIll take a look though your scripts
Btw you don't really need to ask me for permissions as all i did was make an update.zip out of RyanZA's stuff (And ofc added root + right version of busybox)
If you want ill supply you with an update.zip that only includes su, superuser.apk and the right busybox version as the one you included atm also include ase and the scripts which i'm working on cleaning abit up atm.
I don't think that's the only difference. Since I reflashed (like 40x times harrrharr) from yesterday, I can't seem to replicate that scoreWoah.. huge difference for mount vs symlinks?!
yaffs2 native partition on the internal SD card would be awesome. Using yaffs2 instead of ext2 as a virtual drive probably won't help performance. Worth testing though!![]()
Remember he is using a OC'ed kernel so the score will be higher then none OC'ed kernel'sWoah.. huge difference for mount vs symlinks?!
Somehow your scripts look much beautiful than ever.I really hate leaving out people in credits.. but I guess you're right. I'll credit mimocan and ykk_five in the first post, as I think they're the ones most directly involved in this fix.![]()