This makes no sense but it is what I am being told.
The note 8 which is advertised everywhere as water and dust proof/resistant loses that aspect as soon as any official warranty work is carried out on the device (by Samsung themselves)? This is the official Samsung stance?
How can you sell and market a phone as water and dust proof/resistance and when its faulty and needs repairs under warranty and through no fault of my own, claim that it can no longer be guaranteed/warranted against water/dust? The phone should be what I paid for ie Note 8 water and dust proof/resistant. It is not my fault that it needs warranty repairs so why should I then be given an inferior product and not what I had paid and bought in the first place?
Never heard of this kind of bait and switch tactic. Is this even legal?
The note 8 which is advertised everywhere as water and dust proof/resistant loses that aspect as soon as any official warranty work is carried out on the device (by Samsung themselves)? This is the official Samsung stance?
How can you sell and market a phone as water and dust proof/resistance and when its faulty and needs repairs under warranty and through no fault of my own, claim that it can no longer be guaranteed/warranted against water/dust? The phone should be what I paid for ie Note 8 water and dust proof/resistant. It is not my fault that it needs warranty repairs so why should I then be given an inferior product and not what I had paid and bought in the first place?
Never heard of this kind of bait and switch tactic. Is this even legal?