Installed on op5 with havoc 2.4. For the moment everything is fine.
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5000 mediante Tapatalk
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5000 mediante Tapatalk
Damn...oh wellBeta r151 is up! ( Just waiting on next CAF tag for release at this point, almost the same as SDM660 but I don't want to merge QCACLD changes from SDM660 tag so I'll just wait for the MSM8998 tag)
Changelog since r66:
- sched improvements [ from caf 4.14 by me, kuran; 4.9 by kuran, and some minor stuff ]
- some power saving improvements by kerneltoast
- Dsiabled CPU_BOOST
- Removed DYNAMIC_STUNE_BOOST
- Properly fake sched_boost to do nothing
- Hardcode ( still changeable by userspace ) as much as possible in the kernel as possible. Only cpusets remain.
- 1036 min frequency for the small cluster [ I've seen battery and performance improvements with this change ]
- disabled IPC logging
- some memory leaks fixed
- some mm patches thanks to okhttp backported from 4.9
- All variants now use qcacld as inline but separate variants remain
- some fixups to some ufs related modifications by kerneltoast by kerneltoast ( yes this is right grammatically )
- Merged SDM660 tag LA.UM.7.2.r1-06900-sdm660.0 ( No qcacld )
- Merged Android Security Bulletin — May 2019 tag.
Please lemme know if there are any stability issues. I'll remove the ASB merge, there were too many conflicts but I think I resolved them correctly.
Downloads: OOS // Custom // Omni
should've waited XD
Why do you want io schedulers that perform worse?Working fine here - the latest beta. No issues with wifi. Maybe you can add Zen & Maple I/O schedulers if you get time? Also, an option for users to stick to 300-300/500-816 Mhz as minimum Cpu frequency, would that be possible?
I was using BluSpark for a long time, and loving the smoothness of this kernel. Thanks for your work.
Most likely I'll just revert to modules.Still no wifi after dirty flashing stock oos first. What magisk are people using? I'm using 19.1 stable in a decrypted op5...
I self compiled the kernel (with just led control added), could this be it? It shouldn't make any difference.
Sent from my OnePlus 5 using XDA Labs
Beta r151 is up! ( Just waiting on next CAF tag for release at this point, almost the same as SDM660 but I don't want to merge QCACLD changes from SDM660 tag so I'll just wait for the MSM8998 tag)
Changelog since r66:
- sched improvements [ from caf 4.14 by me, kuran; 4.9 by kuran, and some minor stuff ]
- some power saving improvements by kerneltoast
- Dsiabled CPU_BOOST
- Removed DYNAMIC_STUNE_BOOST
- Properly fake sched_boost to do nothing
- Hardcode ( still changeable by userspace ) as much as possible in the kernel as possible. Only cpusets remain.
- 1036 min frequency for the small cluster [ I've seen battery and performance improvements with this change ]
- disabled IPC logging
- some memory leaks fixed
- some mm patches thanks to okhttp backported from 4.9
- All variants now use qcacld as inline but separate variants remain
- some fixups to some ufs related modifications by kerneltoast by kerneltoast ( yes this is right grammatically )
- Merged SDM660 tag LA.UM.7.2.r1-06900-sdm660.0 ( No qcacld )
- Merged Android Security Bulletin — May 2019 tag.
Please lemme know if there are any stability issues. I'll remove the ASB merge, there were too many conflicts but I think I resolved them correctly.
Downloads: OOS // Custom // Omni
should've waited XD
Well in my previous phone, Z5 Premium, mostly every dev suggested these I/O schedulers including even TripNDroid. Anyway, I'll take your word for it about CFQ.Why do you want io schedulers that perform worse?
I'll think about 518/806 but I'm not going to support frequencies lower than that including 300/300 as they're detrimental to performance and battery life. I might test again though before deciding.
I'll be honest, anyone that includes every single cpu, iosched governor out there doesn't really know what they're doing lol [ Not that I'm a pro dev or anything, I'm very new to this stuff ]Well in my previous phone, Z5 Premium, mostly every dev suggested these I/O schedulers including even TripNDroid. Anyway, I'll take your word for it about CFQ.
Thanks for considering the lower frequency ranges.
Yay wifi working again in my setup. Thank you.Build r185 is up!
Changelog since r151:
- Dropped ASB and sdm660 tags
- Merged latest msm8998 tag "LA.UM.7.4.r1-05100-8x98.0".
- Merged several stuff from Q (p2,3,3a)
- Fixed dt2w issue some might've had
- suntan ricing
- Went back to modules for OOS and omni builds
Please lemme know about stability. If all is good, I'll push as stable.
Downloads: OOS // Custom // Omni
I can have a look at it later AFTER this stable release. As far as I can remember, it caused some issue on custom ROMs, but I don't remember what it was.Yay wifi working again in my setup. Thank you.
BTW, any reason to not add led customization? Stock oneplus notification led rate is stupidly slow, it's asinine. Not a complaint as I build the kernel myself with that added, but to be able to customize led fading rate is so damn useful and doesn't affect performance or security in any way.
I'm rejecting all frequencies below 1036/806, that's why.Is there a reason I can't change minimum CPU? Has option for down to 300 but won't take
Hopefully. 4.4.180 is already pushed for review ( see https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=linux-4.4.y ) so I'll wait for that and for a few more days to ensure everything is fine then push.Is stable release coming soon?