Why is wild child jb rom locked?

Crisisx1

Senior Member
May 8, 2011
2,248
348
0
Orlando, FL
Just noticed its been locked for ever... The one with jb aroma... What's wrong with it?

I haven't seen any of his work lately, just curious...

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
 

xManMythLegend

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2008
1,500
134
0
NYC
Give credit where credit is due. Should be xda motto lol

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
He should have just added some credits. His roms were better than those he "borrowed" from. He also updated far more frequently and was always responding to questions.
What a shame.
 

shahkam

Senior Member
Jan 22, 2011
5,002
472
0
28
Canada
He should have just added some credits. His roms were better than those he "borrowed" from. He also updated far more frequently and was always responding to questions.
What a shame.
He knew how things work around xda rules are rules its not because hes a dev he could do what pleased him..

B4NN3D.

Not to be a **** or anything i loved his rom but still ...

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
 

xManMythLegend

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2008
1,500
134
0
NYC
He knew how things work around xda rules are rules its not because hes a dev he could do what pleased him..

B4NN3D.

Not to be a **** or anything i loved his rom but still ...

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Im not against the rules or anything else Im sure they are helpful for the bigger picture.:cyclops: I am however stating its ironic that he did better with there stuff than they did. IMO when a dev does that its usually buggy or simply not as good , his roms were always up to date and he had stuff out much quicker than others.
At the end of the day everyone here is modding someone elses work to begin with so getting banned for using a modification to an open source or Samsung based software is just weird to me.
Isnt that why theres two dev forums to begin with ?
 

Woody

Retired Admin - Vacationing in Nanda Parbat, neck
Nov 18, 2010
8,846
16,531
0
Immersed in Dark Matter
Just so that we are all clear on this subject. He is not Banned.

Like someone above said, he still has a ROM in one of the Note sections (can't remember if NI or NII atm). I am one of the Mods over those sections as well so I have seen his threads and activity.

Now I don't know what exactly went down and why the thread was locked and even if I did, I'm not sure I can speak freely. I was called away on a family emergency that weekend and when I got back it was locked and the other thread about this was in full swing. It seemed like a kang job, but as I said, I do not know the particulars. I am only posting in this thread to let you know that he was not banned and chose to host his S3 ROM elsewhere.

Please don't make this thread into a pissing contest about who's was better and random speculation about what happened. Plus, if he is not here to defend himself, he shouldn't be attacked (not saying that any of the ones that posted attacked him in any way *more for future posters, if this thread stays open).
 
  • Like
Reactions: sswb27 and shahkam

xManMythLegend

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2008
1,500
134
0
NYC
He "borrowed" from me! And alot of other people, he wasnt a dev he was a kang artist! And got caught! You have no idea buddy
Seems like you're arguing semantics. Only thing I see wrong is not giving credit. (ill surrender the end point that it's xdas way of managing things and that's fine.)
However you and everyone else are working off Google and to a lesser extent Samsungs work to begin with he only borrowed what you tweaked in someone else's code to begin with ;don't know why devs feel they should have special treatment. Having followed android *devs* since the early G1 days I find the current state rather egotistical and counter productive at times.
Again I say... I understand about not giving credit but alluding to him being a thief is ironic considering what is actually being done.

You say I have no idea, that's fine perhaps I don't . But proclaiming thievery with exclamation points doesn't exactly educate or inform anyone of anything let alone show that I'm in the dark on the matter.
 

jjlean

Senior Member
May 9, 2009
1,092
104
0
Colorado Springs, CO
Seems like you're arguing semantics. Only thing I see wrong is not giving credit. (ill surrender the end point that it's xdas way of managing things and that's fine.)
However you and everyone else are working off Google and to a lesser extent Samsungs work to begin with he only borrowed what you tweaked in someone else's code to begin with ;don't know why devs feel they should have special treatment. Having followed android *devs* since the early G1 days I find the current state rather egotistical and counter productive at times.
Again I say... I understand about not giving credit but alluding to him being a thief is ironic considering what is actually being done.

You say I have no idea, that's fine perhaps I don't . But proclaiming thievery with exclamation points doesn't exactly educate or inform anyone of anything let alone show that I'm in the dark on the matter.
Doesn't matter. You don't give credit you get banned. Thievery!!!!!!!:thumbup:

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
 

circuit.007

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2012
764
65
0
Credit is the least he can ask. Do you know or even have an idea how long it takes to make a rom? De compiling recompiling apks tweaking smali. **** I tried to theme a couple pngs and 15 toggles and it took me a couple days just reading to figure out what to do! They have to edit a lot of files. It's long tedious work and they do it all for free!!

Regardless if it was based off Google code. They edited and made it unique. It is now theirs. For example for school you have to write a paper about Lincoln. You research about Lincoln and final write your paper. What your saying is that the paper you wrote is not yours because you pretty much just reworded facts you read online. (provided you didn't copy paste) the paper is now your own paper that you can claim rights too.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
 

kelnhofer

Member
Feb 2, 2012
46
2
0
Pahrump, NV
not banned

WC has personal health issues and chose to close his public site for a bit. He has not been Banned and has some awesome new stuff for both the Htc Vivid and the new Htc One. He has been going through a lot and hopefully will be back up and running soon. Gary

S
Just so that we are all clear on this subject. He is not Banned.

Like someone above said, he still has a ROM in one of the Note sections (can't remember if NI or NII atm). I am one of the Mods over those sections as well so I have seen his threads and activity.

Now I don't know what exactly went down and why the thread was locked and even if I did, I'm not sure I can speak freely. I was called away on a family emergency that weekend and when I got back it was locked and the other thread about this was in full swing. It seemed like a kang job, but as I said, I do not know the particulars. I am only posting in this thread to let you know that he was not banned and chose to host his S3 ROM elsewhere.

Please don't make this thread into a pissing contest about who's was better and random speculation about what happened. Plus, if he is not here to defend himself, he shouldn't be attacked (not saying that any of the ones that posted attacked him in any way *more for future posters, if this thread stays open).