Question Why Mi Unlock show "Secret" in Product column ??

[MrEgg48]

So why is my Note 10S product show "Secret" ?? Also when I try to unlock the phone I get "Sorry Couldn't Unlock More Devices By This Account This Month" so I need to wait for 30 days or simply just wait till the end of this month to be able to unlock again ??

Thanks

 

[tutibreaker]

So why is my Note 10S product show "Secret" ?? Also when I try to unlock the phone I get "Sorry Couldn't Unlock More Devices By This Account This Month" so I need to wait for 30 days or simply just wait till the end of this month to be able to unlock again ??

Thanks

to unlock your device you need to use another miaccount

 

[MrEgg48]

to unlock your device you need to use another miaccount

Yeah I did that with another account and this time I get "wait for 168h" message. So 7 days later it is.

By the way why the Product column show "Secret" ??

 

[tutibreaker]

Yeah I did that with another account and this time I get "wait for 168h" message. So 7 days later it is.

By the way why the Product column show "Secret" ??

yup, that the code name of your variant, so there is 3 of them rosemary, maltose and secret, every variant is for an especific market

 

[MrEgg48]

yup, that the code name of your variant, so there is 3 of them rosemary, maltose and secret, every variant is for an especific market

So "rosemary_global_images_V13.0.12.0.SKLMIXM_20221208.0000.00_12.0_global_0da657f4af" fastboot ROM which I just download is not for my 10S ?? Where to download Secret ROM version ??

 

[tutibreaker]

So "rosemary_global_images_V13.0.12.0.SKLMIXM_20221208.0000.00_12.0_global_0da657f4af" fastboot ROM which I just download is not for my 10S ?? Where to download Secret ROM version ??

rosemary in the main code name, all variant works wit that, so no worry about that, the code name is only related to market, not firmware itself

 

[MrEgg48]

rosemary in the main code name, all variant works wit that, so no worry about that, the code name is only related to market, not firmware itself

That's confusing. Thanks anyway