G
GuestK00431
Guest
Every review I've read says the battery life is poor, so I'm guessing that it is and there's no defending it?
As far as i know, stamina halts the background processes, except for the neccessary and white-listed ones. and that's something you can't do. if you shut down a needed process (manually or via a task-killer), then the android-system tries to restart the process... the novelty is, that this is implemented into the os' kernel. and the processes are paused, not shut down (starting them again costs more time and energy than just resuming).And as far as Stamina mode goes, what does it do that I can't? Seems to shut everything down, which any user can do on their own.
it's not about defending, but about fairness and reliability.Every review I've read says the battery life is poor, so I'm guessing that it is and there's no defending it?
Dont get me wrong it is putting me off from the reviews but I still got it coming on Thursday and will judge for my self. If it does end up crap in the long run for my usage then i'll just sell its and get the S4 but time will tell. Willing to give Sony the chance.As far as i know, stamina halts the background processes, except for the neccessary and white-listed ones. and that's something you can't do. if you shut down a needed process (manually or via a task-killer), then the android-system tries to restart the process... the novelty is, that this is implemented into the os' kernel. and the processes are paused, not shut down (starting them again costs more time and energy than just resuming).
---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:57 PM ----------
it's not about defending, but about fairness and reliability.
when it's true that sony batteries do need a few charging cycles before having their full potential (as statet on various threads), then an early review isn't reliable in terms of statements about poor/good battery life.
when buying a new car, you have to run-in the engine. so you are not allowed to full throttle or to fully accelerate. then you cannot say the car/the engine is crap or poor just because on my first drive i couldn't get the promised acceleration from 0-100 in 6 seconds and couldn't drive the maximum speed of 200km/h?!
And also to remind everyone that in order to maintain the efficiency and the ability to hold a good charge, you need to keep the charge in the region of 20% to 80%. This prolongs the battery life (that ability to hold the charge) even more so.As the Z uses a lithium ion battery, priming the new battery over the first charge cycles shouldn't be required. The real issue here is that battery technology hasn't really progressed that far in the past 30 years or so. Phones are becoming more powerful and demanding more power in spite of efficiency savings in components. The battery life of any of the 2013 flagships won't be that spectacular when compared to, say the xperia arc, which can manage 2 days of moderately high usage. Just as the battery life on phones like the galaxy s3, galaxy s2 and one x are all relatively poor with their multi-core processors.
Even if a breakthrough technology was announced tomorrow, it would take years to be realised in a commercial setting. Realistically, if you want high usage out of a high-end phone then you'll have to make provision to charge it away from home - ie. a spare charger/dock that you can keep at work, an external battery pack that you can pop in your bag, a spare battery if you have the removable option. It's obviously not an ideal situation, but all phone manufacturers are restricted by the slow progress in battery technology improvement.
Interesting. What would be spectacular by your standard? ( it's a serious question, I'm not being a smart assAs the Z uses a lithium ion battery, priming the new battery over the first charge cycles shouldn't be required. The real issue here is that battery technology hasn't really progressed that far in the past 30 years or so. Phones are becoming more powerful and demanding more power in spite of efficiency savings in components. The battery life of any of the 2013 flagships won't be that spectacular when compared to, say the xperia arc, which can manage 2 days of moderately high usage. Just as the battery life on phones like the galaxy s3, galaxy s2 and one x are all relatively poor with their multi-core processors.
Even if a breakthrough technology was announced tomorrow, it would take years to be realised in a commercial setting. Realistically, if you want high usage out of a high-end phone then you'll have to make provision to charge it away from home - ie. a spare charger/dock that you can keep at work, an external battery pack that you can pop in your bag, a spare battery if you have the removable option. It's obviously not an ideal situation, but all phone manufacturers are restricted by the slow progress in battery technology improvement.
I think the only reason is weight en thickness.Interesting. What would be spectacular by your standard? ( it's a serious question, I'm not being a smart ass)
Id love some new battery technology on our new powerful phones as well, but I think right now that the software and hardware should be as efficient as possible. Also shipping a phone like the droid DNA for example, with a 2020mah battery is just ridiculous.
I think that battery life like Note 2 and razr maxx hd should be the new standard, if the razr maxx can have a 3300 mah, why can't HTC or Sony do it too? Especially with no options to replace the battery.
Sent from my 3rd Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Agreed, those both phones have set the standard imo, I'd rather have a slightly thicker phone so it has a bigger battery! Tbh 9.3mm (Mot Razr Maxx) is still pretty thin! My Note 2 is a beast for battery life and I know I'm going to struggle when I get the XZ but it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make!Interesting. What would be spectacular by your standard? ( it's a serious question, I'm not being a smart ass)
Id love some new battery technology on our new powerful phones as well, but I think right now that the software and hardware should be as efficient as possible. Also shipping a phone like the droid DNA for example, with a 2020mah battery is just ridiculous.
I think that battery life like Note 2 and razr maxx hd should be the new standard, if the razr maxx can have a 3300 mah, why can't HTC or Sony do it too? Especially with no options to replace the battery.
Sent from my 3rd Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
I understand that but something's gotta give. What's the point of shipping a killer looking phone with a killer design that is gonna spend 6-8 hours on charge (2 charges a day)?I think the only reason is weight en thickness.
"The battery survives well in standby mode, because of the handset’s power-saving facilities, with the display on juice drains quickly. We only got a tad over four hours when media streaming – insignificant when compared to the six hours from the HTC One X+."I understand that but something's gotta give. What's the point of shipping a killer looking phone with a killer design that is gonna spend 6-8 hours on charge (2 charges a day)?
Sent from my 3rd Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
You can't really tell that yet because the battery requires some powercycles to reach it's full potential, but there is a guy here, who speaks very good of the battery life."The battery survives well in standby mode, because of the handset’s power-saving facilities, with the display on juice drains quickly. We only got a tad over four hours when media streaming – insignificant when compared to the six hours from the HTC One X+."
Source:
http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/Feb2013...g-co-uk.html
This is even a worse look into battery performance! It would just mean that you need to plug this to charge whenever you can if you heavily use the XZ. Sony really needs to do better to increase WHILE the screen is on and not just when it's off.
Tell us honestly, actual users of this device: How much SCREEN-ON time do you actually get from a full charge? The above report says just over 4 hours. It's it the same?
SG Note II rooted with stock 4.1.1
Best current battery issue explanation ever.Even if a breakthrough technology was announced tomorrow, it would take years to be realised in a commercial setting. Realistically, if you want high usage out of a high-end phone then you'll have to make provision to charge it away from home - ie. a spare charger/dock that you can keep at work, an external battery pack that you can pop in your bag, a spare battery if you have the removable option. It's obviously not an ideal situation, but all phone manufacturers are restricted by the slow progress in battery technology improvement.
I think it's all about your usage pattern, and looking at the first user reports it could be enough for me. Perhaps I only have to charge extra when my day will be extra long. But than I am able to charge it at work. I guess if you have a very long commute and watch a movie or two during that time it is not sufficient. But there are only a couple of phones that are sufficient for very heavy use.I understand that but something's gotta give. What's the point of shipping a killer looking phone with a killer design that is gonna spend 6-8 hours on charge (2 charges a day)?
Sent from my 3rd Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
they have the device for 2 days, charge it three times and dare to judge the battery life?!More hate about the battery life now from Slash Gear. Hope I wont be sending this phone back cause it looks lovely.
Good point.they have the device for 2 days, charge it three times and dare to judge the battery life?!
There's only one explanation - the battery hasn't discharged yet!Still no gsmarena battery stats, I'm wondering what is taking so long.
LOL, yes that must be it!There's only one explanation - the battery hasn't discharged yet!
And how can a battery be beautiful?