[Xposed] Fingerface - FaceID backward compatible

Search This thread

jljtgr

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
132
35
Google Pixel 4 XL
I had already tested this, it also doesn't work. I will reinstall the system and redo the entire root procedure ...
The funny thing is that I have the EnablerSoli module in magisk and it works well, it looks like edXposed that doesn't work
The very first time I used FingerFace, almost a year ago, it didn't work the first time. I switched from SandHook to a little known YAHFA version and it worked. I thought that was the fix until people claimed that SandHook worked fine. As superstition, I still use YAHFA and it still works... but I imagine that it's more complex than that. I don't think you need to wipe your phone... I think you might just need to experiment more with EdXposed and the associated Riru packages in Magisk.
 
Jun 27, 2013
18
6
São Paulo
The very first time I used FingerFace, almost a year ago, it didn't work the first time. I switched from SandHook to a little known YAHFA version and it worked. I thought that was the fix until people claimed that SandHook worked fine. As superstition, I still use YAHFA and it still works... but I imagine that it's more complex than that. I don't think you need to wipe your phone... I think you might just need to experiment more with EdXposed and the associated Riru packages in Magisk.

Got it!
I removed EdXposed, Magisk and restored the boot.img.


That done:

Installed:
Magisk (Canary 21101)
** restarted the device
MagiskHide Props Config (Latest version)
Systemless Hosts (Latest version)
** restarted the device
Riru (Riru - Core) (21.2)
** restarted the device
Riru - EdXposed (0.5.0.6-android_r (4561) (YAHFA)
** restarted the device
HiddenCore Module (Latest version)
Fingerface (1.1.1)

In MagiskHide I selected, all the way around, Google apps, searching for "google" in the search field
In EdXposed I enabled App List Mode and Pass SafetyNet

At the moment Fingerface works perfectly and SafetyNet has passed!

@jljtgr, thank you for your attention!

Video
 
Last edited:

mattwheat

Senior Member
Oct 25, 2012
1,143
581
BIRMINGHAM
I bought your .apk and Im not even rooted, don't have xposed, and don't plan on installing xposed. Just bought it to show some appreciation for your hard work and to give a big middle finger to those ridiculous pricks that ran their mouth about not posting paid apps on here cuz that's not what the community is about. And to those wanting refunds for a freaking dollar. It's just a dollar people. If you can't read instructions before you buy and you end up spending a dollar on something you can't use because you didn't read then sorry you should lose that dollar. Keep up the good work buddy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beyond246

CyberpodS2

Senior Member
Mar 27, 2012
2,809
1,236
NE Pennsylvania Boonies
I bought your .apk and Im not even rooted, don't have xposed, and don't plan on installing xposed. Just bought it to show some appreciation for your hard work and to give a big middle finger to those ridiculous pricks that ran their mouth about not posting paid apps on here cuz that's not what the community is about. And to those wanting refunds for a freaking dollar. It's just a dollar people. If you can't read instructions before you buy and you end up spending a dollar on something you can't use because you didn't read then sorry you should lose that dollar. Keep up the good work buddy.


Right on brother!! I donated to a half dozen devs in here whenever I can no matter if I use their stuff or not for the same reasons. This community supporting the 4xl has been pretty darn committed even when things were not looking very productive for a while. I've got nothing but respect for those keeping this scene going!
 

Suavie103

Senior Member
Jun 15, 2014
133
19
Google Pixel C
Google Pixel 4 XL
Got it!
I removed EdXposed, Magisk and restored the boot.img.


That done:

Installed:
Magisk (Canary 21101)
** restarted the device
MagiskHide Props Config (Latest version)
Systemless Hosts (Latest version)
** restarted the device
Riru (Riru - Core) (21.2)
** restarted the device
Riru - EdXposed (0.5.0.6-android_r (4561) (YAHFA)
** restarted the device
HiddenCore Module (Latest version)
Fingerface (1.1.1)

In MagiskHide I selected, all the way around, Google apps, searching for "google" in the search field
In EdXposed I enabled App List Mode and Pass SafetyNet

At the moment Fingerface works perfectly and SafetyNet has passed!

@jljtgr, thank you for your attention!

Video

Are you still using hidden core mod? And are you using it to pass safety net?
 

jljtgr

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
132
35
Google Pixel 4 XL
That depends on a combination of things. Similar to how you need a certain level/version of Magisk to work with A11, you need a certain level of Edxposed to say that it works properly. After that, it's mostly the modules that have issues with A11, not Edxposed itself. That said, FingerFace works just as well with A11 as it did with A10.

Look at the past couple pages and people have said what versions of everything they use. I personally had problems getting anything to work with the newest Riru Core module, but that might have been ironed out with specific versions of other things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gotty91

davide91100

New member
Jan 26, 2021
1
0
Hi all guys, is there anyone currently using this xposed module? I tried to install it and it works fine, but with the module activated, safetynet does not pass. When I deactivate it, it comes back to pass.
I am using the safetynet-fix-v1.1.1 module; I have hidden most of the google apps with magiskhide and I have hidden the magiskmanager. what am I doing wrong?
 

jljtgr

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
132
35
Google Pixel 4 XL
Works on galaxy A70?
You might have to find out the hard way... but if this device uses a face unlock that the A10 biometric API deems secure, it should work. TBH, if there is another secure biometric unlock method, it should work as well. The module re-routes old fingerprint API calls to new biometric API calls. But if Samsung cooked up their own face unlock not based on the biometric API, then it won't work.
 

Kris Chen

Senior Member
Jan 10, 2013
685
291
Taoyuan
Have you upgraded your edxposed and edxposed manager ?
How do you setup your applist ? blacklist or whitelist ?
In safetynet test, both items fail or just ctsprofile check fails ?
Have you tried to install magisk module of MagiskHideProps to resetup your fingerprint ?

To myself, I changed applist from blacklist mode to whitelist mode and didn't setup anything further in edxposed except for necessary setup for making GravityBox working.

Hi all guys, is there anyone currently using this xposed module? I tried to install it and it works fine, but with the module activated, safetynet does not pass. When I deactivate it, it comes back to pass.
I am using the safetynet-fix-v1.1.1 module; I have hidden most of the google apps with magiskhide and I have hidden the magiskmanager. what am I doing wrong?
 

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 33
    Hi, Everyone,

    Pixel 4 remove fingerprint sensor, but most of app did not update to newest biometrics api yet.

    I build this module to proxy old fingerprint api to biometrics api .

    You can use FaceID just like fingerprint.

    Here is github link,

    You should build apk by your self, it much safer.

    but if you want buy me a coffee, here is google play link.

    Hope you guys like it.

    QA

    Q. Is this module safely?

    A. First, this app didn't have network permission. It can not send anything out.

    Fingerprint api and biometrics api just receive authenticate request from app and tell app is authenticate success or not.

    App will not sent any your data to those api.

    Q. Magisk module
    A. Use pure magisk to implement this feature need much work. I will working on it but it won't release soon.
    11
    Wait, what? So the only way it can be published here is if he offers a free version as well? That's fukd up. I thought the idea of this site was to help users, which i believe he did. #f*ckxda and their ****ty rules
    Excuse me? Do you not even understand the reasoning behind this? It's to prevent people from using this site to advertise their paid apps, using XDA to make money off of THEIR userbase.
    How would you like it if every rom was paid? If every root method was paid? This community is about giving to each other, not for profit.
    I do believe in donating to those who deserve it don't get me wrong, but that's not what this community was founded upon.
    If you don't like the rules then you're welcome to leave.



    Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
    4
    This is against XDA rules unless you post a free version for us to use BTW
    Wait, what? So the only way it can be published here is if he offers a free version as well? That's fukd up. I thought the idea of this site was to help users, which i believe he did. #f*ckxda and their ****ty rules
    4
    Excuse me? Do you not even understand the reasoning behind this? It's to prevent people from using this site to advertise their paid apps, using XDA to make money off of THEIR userbase.
    How would you like it if every rom was paid? If every root method was paid? This community is about giving to each other, not for profit.
    I do believe in donating to those who deserve it don't get me wrong, but that's not what this community was founded upon.
    If you don't like the rules then you're welcome to leave.
    Well then, that's up to the moderators to actually do their job and not to enforce an absolutist mentality. Personally, whether someone advertises their paid app here or somewhere else, the bottom line is to help the end user. So, by saying you need to post a free version actually inhibits quite a dew devs from sharing their work here, for that exact reason. Same goes for posting TG links. This site is supposed to help people as a whole, not dictate what they determine to be viable outlets. Leave that to the users to decide. I cant tell you how many well known devs are sick and tired of xda and their antiquated rules. Which is a shame, cuz they are actually pushing good devs away.
    4
    Wait, what? So the only way it can be published here is if he offers a free version as well? That's fukd up. I thought the idea of this site was to help users, which i believe he did. #f*ckxda and their ****ty rules
    You're looking for xda-users.com
Our Apps
Get our official app!
The best way to access XDA on your phone
Nav Gestures
Add swipe gestures to any Android
One Handed Mode
Eases uses one hand with your phone