Concratz!
---------- Post added at 04:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:56 PM ----------
Awhh why? ;(
I mean the phones by Sony. I don't know. They are so common for me. There is no Sony mobile that has impressed me.
Concratz!
---------- Post added at 04:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:56 PM ----------
Awhh why? ;(
@linuxct - I presume those pics of the olive tree are not in the same day or same time of day, because the lighting looks different. Am i right ?
Yes, they're from the same day. The time difference was of about 15-20 minutes, the time I needed to make a TWRP backup of current ROM, restore my old TWRP backup with old camera blobs and take the shot. The color difference you notice is the blob itself. You can have a look too on the EXIF data
I just checked the daylight pictures. Was it so grainy? I don't use the camera much (and there was not point on using it with the crappy .175 quality either), but in the few tests I did my pictures were heavily smeared, never grainy.
Anyway, I did a couple of tests myself. It's not worth to post the pictures, one is just a stupid water bottle and I don't have steady hands either.
The small text on the bottle is quite clear, now, no trace of smearing. And in the pictures or the cars I took from my window now the license plates are readable (well, they would be if there wasn't some motion blur!!). Same ugly weather in both (miserable gray). It seems ok by me.
I want to flash the Kitkat camera. 182 update is still not as good. How can a noob do this?
Ah, ok. But where did that TWRP backup come from? Who/which Country has got the update? Plus wasn't the OTA 280MB or something? Your zip is less than 2MB? This feels like the wait for Lollipop all over (with much less hype, sure! ).
Nicely lit stills are all well and good, but are there any comparsons of indoors low light motion to see how "motion blur" fares? Ie, something as simple as a person waving their hand or turning their head?