I mean the phones by Sony. I don't know. They are so common for me. There is no Sony mobile that has impressed me.
I mean the phones by Sony. I don't know. They are so common for me. There is no Sony mobile that has impressed me.
And what the flying f*ck does your opinion on Sony phones have anything to do with this thread? This is a discussion regarding camera quality between different software versions, nobody cares about your offtopic.
@linuxct - I presume those pics of the olive tree are not in the same day or same time of day, because the lighting looks different. Am i right ?
@linuxct - I presume those pics of the olive tree are not in the same day or same time of day, because the lighting looks different. Am i right ?
Last edited:
Yes, they're from the same day. The time difference was of about 15-20 minutes, the time I needed to make a TWRP backup of current ROM, restore my old TWRP backup with old camera blobs and take the shot. The color difference you notice is the blob itself. You can have a look too on the EXIF data
D2303 5.1.1 with root,no recovery (Italy)
hi, I have a D2303 with lollipop 5.1.1 ( 1.75 ) with root , no recovery , will come OTA with the root ?
hi, I have a D2303 with lollipop 5.1.1 ( 1.75 ) with root , no recovery , will come OTA with the root ?
Yes, they're from the same day. The time difference was of about 15-20 minutes, the time I needed to make a TWRP backup of current ROM, restore my old TWRP backup with old camera blobs and take the shot. The color difference you notice is the blob itself. You can have a look too on the EXIF data
I just checked the daylight pictures. Was it so grainy? I don't use the camera much (and there was not point on using it with the crappy .175 quality either), but in the few tests I did my pictures were heavily smeared, never grainy.
Anyway, I did a couple of tests myself. It's not worth to post the pictures, one is just a stupid water bottle and I don't have steady hands either.
The small text on the bottle is quite clear, now, no trace of smearing. And in the pictures or the cars I took from my window now the license plates are readable (well, they would be if there wasn't some motion blur!!). Same ugly weather in both (miserable gray). It seems ok by me.
I just checked the daylight pictures. Was it so grainy? I don't use the camera much (and there was not point on using it with the crappy .175 quality either), but in the few tests I did my pictures were heavily smeared, never grainy.
Anyway, I did a couple of tests myself. It's not worth to post the pictures, one is just a stupid water bottle and I don't have steady hands either.
The small text on the bottle is quite clear, now, no trace of smearing. And in the pictures or the cars I took from my window now the license plates are readable (well, they would be if there wasn't some motion blur!!). Same ugly weather in both (miserable gray). It seems ok by me.
Maybe because of the camera config: I always shot them using Automatic Superior mode, in 8mpx, using Z5 v2 camera, maybe that can be related.
After update quality is much better
Sample with defocus :http://www12.zippyshare.com/v/Ys1JOLt3/file.html
Sample with defocus :http://www12.zippyshare.com/v/Ys1JOLt3/file.html
Last edited:
Sounds crazy to some
I want to flash the Kitkat camera. 182 update is still not as good. How can a noob do this?
I want to flash the Kitkat camera. 182 update is still not as good. How can a noob do this?
You can't, have you tried clearing the data from the camera apps. Or try doing a factory reset after Updating Camera is fine now
Similar threads
Top Liked Posts
-
There are no posts matching your filters.
-
12I think it's pretty much self explanatory. Before you ask, yeah, it has improved waaaay much. Please check here if you want to patch your current rom (Stock .175, deodexed, or Z5 STYLE) with Sony's Camera Fixes.
Near object:
Not-so-near object:
Computer Screen (very near)
My Raspberry
_______________________________________
Added 31/12/2015 - Daylight pictures. Note that 'After' (NOW) images have less grain, but they look more purplish I'd say (and way crispier).
My olive:
My garden:
I'll update tomorrow with daylight pics (my garden for example)4Ah, ok. But where did that TWRP backup come from? Who/which Country has got the update? Plus wasn't the OTA 280MB or something? Your zip is less than 2MB? This feels like the wait for Lollipop all over (with much less hype, sure!).
The backup came from a D2306, Generic Latam device, from @FalleN_lMaster (as you can see inside it, Chargemon is pointing to MultiRecovery, and there are some traces of Kingroot in system, so when I first downloaded it I deleted them).
And yes, update was 280MB, but take into account ALL .odex, plus some APKs, and ALL LIBS were new (as WinMerge reported), so, maybe that's the thing... And, instead of replacing all of them when making the zip (which returns a bootloop, by the way), I only replaced camera-related libs (all libchromatix, libcameraoem, camera.msm8226.so, Morpho Settings, etc).
I hope now all works for everyone as intended, and there're no more complains in the forum (but we all know that's impossible hah)3
Well, I've tried it but, except from the noise...
[BTW, those are some headphones, with red LEDs, bouncing...]
