Clearing up the display issue of the Xperia Z

Search This thread

Riyal

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2011
3,038
1,770
Iloilo City
Plastic tend to flex while glass is fragile. Sure glass could survive a drop on a material where it is harder but I highly doubt it if it were to be dropped on a metal/concrete surface. Impact would create a deep shock on it's body and I don't think any glass could survive that. Since glasses are pretty solid and doesn't really have any shock absorbent property on it.

Maybe we would have to wait for a drop test video of gizmoslip for the Xperia Z/ZL :D
 

stefanve

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2005
1,028
188

ethan3686

Senior Member
Aug 19, 2009
1,168
135
India

craftycarper1

Senior Member
Feb 1, 2011
1,043
293
Northampton
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Hi! If you don't mind could you try installing this software on your Xperia Z?

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.netmanslab.sa&hl=en

And see if you can fix the saturation like they say.

If you can then I can confirm that the issue is within the ROM it is using and not in the display nor the gamma values defined on the kernel.

This will be the deal breaker for me......patiently waiting some feedback about this, i like the screen, but for 2 years?....not so sure......i got my One X on a 12 month contract and was hoping to do the same with the Z.........but none about.

If this app makes no difference whatsoever then i will probably be pre ordering the M7/One when details come out about contracts.
 

stefanve

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2005
1,028
188
This will be the deal breaker for me......patiently waiting some feedback about this, i like the screen, but for 2 years?....not so sure......i got my One X on a 12 month contract and was hoping to do the same with the Z.........but none about.

If this app makes no difference whatsoever then i will probably be pre ordering the M7/One when details come out about contracts.

Indeed, although I'm kinda worried about the battery life of the M7 since everyone says the One X has a rubbish battery life. It could be a trade off i'm willing to make as the display is as step up from what I have now, would be far more difficult if it was a step down :)
 

craftycarper1

Senior Member
Feb 1, 2011
1,043
293
Northampton
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Indeed, although I'm kinda worried about the battery life of the M7 since everyone says the One X has a rubbish battery life. It could be a trade off i'm willing to make as the display is as step up from what I have now, would be far more difficult if it was a step down :)

One X running custom ROMs give good battery life.....i regularly get 2+ days out of mine, light to medium usage.....in fact i have had over 4 days from my battery, only 2hrs screen on time, but still, good battery stats can easily be achieved. I am not a heavy gamer, but once i initially got over the "new phone" period with my One X, the battery became easily more manageable, and i would expect the same to be true for the M7.

Also the battery should be quite easy to change for one of a higher capacity, as many are now doing with the One X, changing the battery for the higher output one from the X+.
 

Ambroos

Senior Member
Aug 11, 2010
1,397
914
Dublin / Belgium
Hi! If you don't mind could you try installing this software on your Xperia Z?

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.netmanslab.sa&hl=en

And see if you can fix the saturation like they say.

If you can then I can confirm that the issue is within the ROM it is using and not in the display nor the gamma values defined on the kernel.

Tried, but the best way by far is default (without the app). Changing any value just decreases the contrast or throws off the colour balance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stefanve

stefanve

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2005
1,028
188
Tried, but the best way by far is default (without the app). Changing any value just decreases the contrast or throws off the colour balance.

Thanks, in the end it would still be possible since the bravia engine manage to get more vibrant colors from the display. sure would have been nice to get that without lo level trickery
 

Ambroos

Senior Member
Aug 11, 2010
1,397
914
Dublin / Belgium
Thanks, in the end it would still be possible since the bravia engine manage to get more vibrant colors from the display. sure would have been nice to get that without lo level trickery

Bravia Engine just increases the saturation of images.

This actually is a good thing. It means that the Xperia Z is a nuanced display that doesn't do a cutoff but actually is capable of displaying all the colour gradations properly. The display is fine, I don't know how many times I have to keep repeating it. The only 'problem' with the Xperia Z is that the UI uses a lot of greys, causing everything to look a bit dull, especially with higher brightness settings. Colours are pretty deep and accurate.
 

stefanve

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2005
1,028
188
Bravia Engine just increases the saturation of images.

This actually is a good thing. It means that the Xperia Z is a nuanced display that doesn't do a cutoff but actually is capable of displaying all the colour gradations properly. The display is fine, I don't know how many times I have to keep repeating it. The only 'problem' with the Xperia Z is that the UI uses a lot of greys, causing everything to look a bit dull, especially with higher brightness settings. Colours are pretty deep and accurate.

Yeah I have to see it my self, some people think that my TV looks dull while it is near perfectly calibrated but these days some people are used to highly over saturated un natural color palettes. It's just like with food, eat enough highly salty or sweet food and every thing else seems tasteless :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stedus and Ambroos

Ambroos

Senior Member
Aug 11, 2010
1,397
914
Dublin / Belgium
Yeah I have to see it my self, some people think that my TV looks dull while it is near perfectly calibrated but these days some people are used to highly over saturated un natural color palettes. It's just like with food, eat enough highly salty or sweet food and every thing else seems tasteless :)

Exactly. I work on a Vaio Z with a very accurate colour reproduction myself, a display that has been praised numerous times for being very high quality and I hardly notice any difference in reproduction with my Xperia Z (without Bravia Engine), unlike all other phones I've seen before. I'm very pleased!
 

Shasarak

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2009
1,351
127
London
Exactly. I work on a Vaio Z with a very accurate colour reproduction myself, a display that has been praised numerous times for being very high quality and I hardly notice any difference in reproduction with my Xperia Z (without Bravia Engine), unlike all other phones I've seen before. I'm very pleased!
Really? The only detailed colorimeter analysis of the XZ screen that I've seen wasn't exactly flattering. See slides 5-12, here: http://www.phonearena.com/news/Scre...ows-almost-perfect-calibration-by-HTC_id39893 The colour temperature swings all over the place as you move across the grey-scale (and is, on average, too blue); and red and green primaries are decidedly over-saturated (the Butterfly does a far better job of both, but is a bit weaker in terms of gamma accuracy).

Reviews consistently point to a poor black-level, too; for example: http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z-review-887p3.php or here (third photo): http://www.frandroid.com/test/128142_sony-xperia-z-test-smartphone-android/3/
 

stefanve

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2005
1,028
188
Really? The only detailed colorimeter analysis of the XZ screen that I've seen wasn't exactly flattering. See slides 5-12, here: http://www.phonearena.com/news/Scre...ows-almost-perfect-calibration-by-HTC_id39893 The colour temperature swings all over the place as you move across the grey-scale (and is, on average, too blue); and red and green primaries are decidedly over-saturated (the Butterfly does a far better job of both, but is a bit weaker in terms of gamma accuracy).

Reviews consistently point to a poor black-level, too; for example: http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z-review-887p3.php or here (third photo): http://www.frandroid.com/test/128142_sony-xperia-z-test-smartphone-android/3/

I think it is clear that the z uses the lesser screen tech, but perhaps also less power hungry.
For me the question is how much worse is it, if it is a a big a difference with the xt I would be disappointed. But than again if the leaked specs are true of the m7 it would be a very power hungry device with a relatively weak battery and that could be the deciding factor for me.
 

dibdin

Senior Member
Mar 6, 2012
428
48
Kent
I think it is clear that the z uses the lesser screen tech, but perhaps also less power hungry.
For me the question is how much worse is it, if it is a a big a difference with the xt I would be disappointed. But than again if the leaked specs are true of the m7 it would be a very power hungry device with a relatively weak battery and that could be the deciding factor for me.

It was mentioned by a member on this forum who has the T that he/she could see little to no difference when comparing both devices. Have to say I was somewhat disappointed in hearing that.
 

z.o.cc

Member
Mar 17, 2011
5
1
lecce
ZL does use the same screen as Xperia Z and what's economical IPS? If you're talking about e-IPS it's Enhanced-IPS not Economical-IPS. There's no such thing.

Also isn't e-IPS made by LG? And the display here isn't from LG but from sharp.

As you can see in the document it is a LTPS type of panel.

Panel Low-temperature poly-silicon (LTPS) TFT

LTPS is a description of a manufacturing process, not a display technology. Low-temperature polycrystalline silicon can be used to make different types of screens – AMOLED as well as standard LCDs. It’s a way of creating tiny silicon crystals that go into making the pixels of a display.
I guess samsung use LTPS to make the flexible amoled display.
the LCD family are TN, VA and IPS and the Xperia Z/ZL probably is a kind of e-IPS display because pro and cons are typialc of this display family.
 

stefanve

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2005
1,028
188
Really? The only detailed colorimeter analysis of the XZ screen that I've seen wasn't exactly flattering. See slides 5-12, here: http://www.phonearena.com/news/Scre...ows-almost-perfect-calibration-by-HTC_id39893 The colour temperature swings all over the place as you move across the grey-scale (and is, on average, too blue); and red and green primaries are decidedly over-saturated (the Butterfly does a far better job of both, but is a bit weaker in terms of gamma accuracy).

Reviews consistently point to a poor black-level, too; for example: http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z-review-887p3.php or here (third photo): http://www.frandroid.com/test/128142_sony-xperia-z-test-smartphone-android/3/

http://hi-tech.mail.ru/review/misc/Sony_Xperia_Z-rev.html

this one has even more detail, it's in Russian but readable with translate.google.com

I should note that they report a contrast ratio of 570:1 nearly the same as gsmarena first reported than changed it to 700:1.
Also they say that the screen of the HTC butterfly is miles better than the Z, but again they would choose the Z over the butterfly. Almost every review says it's the best on the market so it must do allot of things right to get that label in spite of it's sub par screen.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: xchasa

Kurowsk1

Member
Feb 11, 2013
11
1
Newcastle upon Tyne
this one has even more detail, it's in Russian but readable with translate.google.com

I should note that they report a contrast ratio of 570:1 nearly the same as gsmarena first reported than changed it to 700:1.
Also they say that the screen of the HTC butterfly is miles better than the Z, but again they would choose the Z over the butterfly. Almost every review says it's the best on the market so it must do allot of things right to get that label in spite of it's sub par screen.

Screen looks just as good in every photo apart from the extreme viewing angle on that site though?

f9EYcSn.jpg
 

samxool

Senior Member
Aug 24, 2012
157
27
Bravia Engine just increases the saturation of images.

This actually is a good thing. It means that the Xperia Z is a nuanced display that doesn't do a cutoff but actually is capable of displaying all the colour gradations properly. The display is fine, I don't know how many times I have to keep repeating it. The only 'problem' with the Xperia Z is that the UI uses a lot of greys, causing everything to look a bit dull, especially with higher brightness settings. Colours are pretty deep and accurate.

EXPLAIN why in chrome, whites don't look white until you turn the brightness way up.
But by turning the brightness way up, blacks no longer black, but all washed out.
and vice versa when you decrease birghtness.
The display is washed out, I don't know how many times I have to keep repeating it.
 

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 62
    Hello guys! I am making this thread in order to solve the confusion about the display of the Xperia Z. I was a bit surprised today when I saw my rss flooding with the discussion of how crap the display was on the retail models.


    To start of I would like to tell you all that both the Docomo variant and international variant of Xperia Z display are the same! They both are using the Renesas R63311 variant of LCDs. Which is using actually Sharp technology for the displays. Yeah it's not made by sony.

    http://www.rsp.renesas.com/en/news/2012/news20120418.htm

    So the issue of the color saturation between the international model and docomo model is suppose to be the calibration of the values of the display(a configuration in the kernel level).

    In short the issue is within the software side and not the hardware so NO it's not true that sony did put cheaper displays on the international version compared to the docomo versions. Cause there's no cheap and premium edition of the Renesas R63311 model.

    Now most of you would probably doubt me now on how I was able to tell you this and what are my sources.


    Now being a kernel developer and have very solid knowledge with hardwares I would like to show you here concrete proofs of what I am talking about (Kernel developers are welcome to prove my point here)

    Here is the kernel config file of the docomo version of Xperia Z

    https://bitbucket.org/Don2x/so-02e-.../configs/fusion3_yuga_dcm_defconfig?at=master

    The boolean configs for the display drivers is located in line 398 and 399.
    Code:
    CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY70=y
    CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_SHARP_LS050T3SX01=y


    Looking at the Makefile
    https://bitbucket.org/Don2x/so-02e-...7/kernel/drivers/video/msm/Makefile?at=master

    the display drivers of those configs basically call out the files
    Code:
    obj-$(CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY70) += mipi_dsi_panel_r63311_jdc_mdy70.o
    obj-$(CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY80) += mipi_dsi_panel_r63311_jdc_mdy80.o
    obj-$(CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_SHARP_LS050T3SX01) += mipi_dsi_panel_r63311_sharp_ls050t3sx01.o


    Now how can I tell that it is the one used by Xperia Z?

    If you view the board files of the Xperia Z the display if defined here.

    https://bitbucket.org/Don2x/so-02e-...ch-msm/board-sony_fusion3-display.c?at=master

    Code:
    #ifdef CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY70
    	&jdc_mdy70_panel_id_dlogo_02,
    	&jdc_mdy70_panel_id_dlogo_2a,
    	&jdc_mdy70_panel_id_dlogo,
    	&jdc_mdy70_panel_id_1a,
    	&jdc_mdy70_panel_id_1a_02,
    	&jdc_mdy70_panel_id,
    #endif /* CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY70 */
    #ifdef CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY80
    	&jdc_mdy80_black_panel_id,
    	&jdc_mdy80_white_panel_id,
    #endif /* CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY80 */
    #ifdef CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_SHARP_LS050T3SX01
    	&sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_dlogo_01,
    	&sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_dlogo,
    	&sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_1a,
    	&sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_1a_02,
    	&sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id,
    #endif /* CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_SHARP_LS050T3SX01 */

    Now this alone proves that Docomo version indeed uses the display I mentioned. Now how do I prove that it is the same as with the international version? Of course by providing the kernel sources of the international version also.


    Now here's the config file for the

    International version of Xperia Z:
    https://bitbucket.org/Don2x/intl.-y.../arm/configs/fusion3_yuga_defconfig?at=master

    on line 391 & 392:

    CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY70=y
    CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_SHARP_LS050T3SX01=y


    Defconfig of Xperia ZL for reference here

    International version of Xperia ZL:

    https://bitbucket.org/Don2x/intl.-y.../arm/configs/fusion3_odin_defconfig?at=master

    And board files of the international version of Xperia Z.

    https://bitbucket.org/Don2x/intl.-y...ch-msm/board-sony_fusion3-display.c?at=master

    Code:
    #ifdef CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY70
            &jdc_mdy70_panel_id_dlogo_02,
            &jdc_mdy70_panel_id_dlogo_2a,
            &jdc_mdy70_panel_id_dlogo,
            &jdc_mdy70_panel_id_1a,
            &jdc_mdy70_panel_id_1a_02,
            &jdc_mdy70_panel_id,
    #endif /* CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY70 */
    #ifdef CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY80
            &jdc_mdy80_black_panel_id,
            &jdc_mdy80_white_panel_id,
    #endif /* CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_JDC_MDY80 */
    #ifdef CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_SHARP_LS050T3SX01
            &sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_dlogo_01,
            &sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_dlogo,
            &sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_1a,
            &sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id_1a_02,
            &sharp_ls050t3sx01_panel_id,
    #endif /* CONFIG_FB_MSM_MIPI_R63311_SHARP_LS050T3SX01 */


    You can see the similar display drivers being used by the international version & docomo version here.


    So my point here is demo model or not. Docomo variant or not they all use the same LCD technology! There's no difference!


    Now how do I prove to all of you that they're not the same kernel sources and I didn't just made duplicates and remove some files?

    Compare these yourself.

    Docomo version:
    http://developer.sonymobile.com/dow...s/open-source-archive-for-build-10-1-d-0-317/

    International version:
    http://developer.sonymobile.com/dow...s/open-source-archive-for-build-10-1-a-1-350/


    All in all the very basic logic here is that you can't use a single display driver on different types of hardware which should make a point that if two different sources uses the same driver only leads to having the same hardware.
    8
    :D found a decent description of the 3

    AH-IPS
    This display technology has been invented by LG. It is an abbreviation for Advanced High performing - In-Plane Switching LCD. It is being touted as the actual competitor to Samsung's 'Super AMOLED' display. In a competition held by 'Intertek', LG's AH-IPS display actually defeated Samsung's Super AMOLED in 2 parameters: Color-Accuracy and Power-Efficiency. You can find this display in the recently released LG Nitro HD.

    LTPS
    This is an abbreviation for 'Low Temperature Poly Silicon' LCD. One of the important characteristics of such displays is that, the drive circuits are directly integrated onto the glass surface which contributes to reducing the number of component parts designed on the outside substrate. This leads to the display's durability being enhanced. The reduced size of the TFT section leads to a crisper display and also leads to lower power consumption. You can find this display in the Lenovo LePad S2005.

    ASV
    This is an abbreviation for Advanced Super View display. The important characteristic of this display is that it offers excellent viewing angles and competes with the In-Plane Switching (IPS) LCDs. You can find this display in theMeizu MX.
    5
    I would argue that this is the Xperia Z forum, so as long as we are talking about the XZ, whats the problem?
    You have every right to praise the XZ, and we have every right to slate it for not being good enough.

    That's the text book definition of trolling.

    The people who are actually 'praising' or are excited about the device are actually enamored with the device and intend to buy it - they are hence in pursuit of talking about every aspect of their future purchase amongst themselves.

    The other party will have nothing to do with the device - and so are just continously slating it for no apparent reason and, by doing so, just annoy everyone else by repeatedly bringing up 'bad' things about the device WE ALREADY KNOW.

    Classic trolling, if you ask me.
    5
    According to this staff member the displays are the same on all Sony Xperia Z handsets.

    chat2.jpg
    5
    No, unfortunately Sony is late to the game again, just like every other time they have released a phone to the market.

    Had the Xperia Z been released when the DNA was... sure.

    But not now. Not a chance in hell.

    So why spend every moment of time on this forum slating it? If there is another device you like, then go to that forum and enjoy your phone and stop trying to make all of us out as if we're imbeciles.

    Just a kind request to leave us in peace :) not just you but everyone else who is making it a mission to slate this phone with every ounce of breadth.

    ITS A GOOD PHONE AND I LIKE IT....SO WHAT'S ALL OF YOUR PROBLEM? :D

    Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium